Independent researchers have published a technical analysis of the USD1 smart contract.
#USD1 solana:USD1ttGY1N17NEEHLmELoaybftRBUSErhqYiQzvEmuB @worldlibertyfi#WLFI
Everyone holding or considering USD1 should read it carefully.
To put it in the bluntest terms, per their findings:
USD1's highest-level permissions allow the issuer to move USD1 out of YOUR account into its own wallet — or anyone else's — without your consent. Cold wallet? Multisig? Doesn't matter. The authority operates at the token contract level. Nothing you do can stop it.
Let that sink in:
this is a "stablecoin" whose issuer holds the technical power to reach into any holder's wallet and take the funds.
And there's a second finding that, frankly, is even more disturbing.
Per the researchers' analysis, the USD1 source code published on World Liberty's official GitHub does NOT match the code actually deployed on-chain.
The published version contains no "drain" or "reallocate" functions. The deployed version — after an April 2026 upgrade — contains both.
Anyone in crypto knows exactly what that pattern is. Showing auditors and users a clean codebase while running different code on-chain is the signature technique of rug pulls.
It sits at the top of every blockchain security firm's fraud-detection checklist — because there is no innocent reason to publish one contract and deploy another. Its only function is to defeat scrutiny.
A company that is currently seeking a U.S. national trust bank charter is using a playbook straight out of the exit-scam manual.
And as I allege in my Complaint, this is not the first time. The same pattern — backdoor functions added after the fact, contrary to public representations — is exactly what happened with the $WLFI token itself. First $WLFI. Now USD1. Once is a design choice. Twice is a pattern.
Don't take my word for it. Don't take theirs. The contracts are on-chain — verify every claim yourself. That's what blockchains are for.
Probability: “1 in 7 quintillion”
Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, Larry Silverstein -through his company and World Trade Center Properties LLC-received a total of approximately $4.65 billion across multiple massive legal battles. He also missed work that day.
1. The Insurance Companies ($4.55 Billion)
Silverstein originally held a property insurance policy with a face value of $3.55 billion. He sued his group of primary insurers, arguing that the two airplane strikes into two separate towers constituted two distinct
"occurrences" under the contract language, which would entitle him to double the payout ($7.1 billion).
2. The Aviation Defendants ($95.2 Million)
In 2004, Silverstein filed a separate lawsuit against the aviation industry for alleged negligence regarding airport security protocols.
He initially sought $12.3
billion in damages.
3. Crucial Subrogation Nuance (The $1.2 Billion Dispute)
In a separate subrogation lawsuit, Silverstein's own property insurers sued the airlines to recoup the money they had previously paid to Silverstein.
The insurers won a $1.2 billion settlement from the aviation companies in 2010.
Tomorrow, the House will vote on the NDAA, which includes a provision to merge parts of our military with the IDF.
This amendment is an existential threat to American sovereignty and democracy.
Every member of Congress must vote NO.