TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

Too busy to work. Well peaked. Repealist & Realist. Proud swivel eyed loon.

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

I wrote a new poem "Why Do I Care?"

[TheRoadknight @RoadknightThe]

As a gay man, I say: you did this - you, the far-Left LGBTIAQ+ activists with your grotesque parades, your absurd 'pronouns', your men in women's spaces and your drag queen storytimes.

You did this. You pushed and pushed the boundaries of power to see what you could get away with, using the 'cause' as a testudo: criticise us and you're a 'homophobe', 'transphobe', etc.

You used us, the 'normie' gays as a cause, to radicalise and militarise, whilst weaponising speech, with what others can and cannot say - and now you're surprised that there's kick-back?

Oh, sure, you'll now use that as: "See? See? Look at all the homophobia and transphobia! We told you!" but it was you that caused the homophobia and transphobia with your ridiculous power moves for 5% of the population.

We asked for equality. We got that. We asked for Same-Sex Marriage. We got that. But you wouldn't stop there. Emboldened by the generosity of those who, in many countries, voted for or supported the latter, you wanted to see how much further you could go.

You poked the bear. The bear didn't react. But you kept poking and finally the bear reacted. And now we're in a position where the bear recognises you every time and will swipe back.

You did this.

[Caro Betts @BettsCaro]

In honour of @akuareindorf and @ForWomenScot who’ve been doing a sterling job of *explaining something quite straightforward to idiots*
I’ve made an easy-read version that, hopefully, MPs may find more digestible

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

"He took my brothers turban off". Apparently the worst thing that happened, requiring police rush to the scene. Meanwhile a young white man, erroneously accused of racism bleeds out in police custody 🙄

[Gill, Nebraskan Land Seal 🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 @Gillian_Philip]

“Safety is the main thing, for them [the police] and for you yourself.”

Says the call handler to the liar. While knowing there’s a young man on the ground, blood in his mouth.

If you thought you couldn’t be angrier, listen to Gurpreet Digwa’s 999 call.

[Lily Maynard @LilyLilyMaynard]

I hope the @cityoflondon & #HampsteadLadiesPond are proud of themselves. This is what you’re enabling- this is what you are cheering for. Blokes pissing in the women’s pond & showing off about it.
Fun times
#LetWomenSwim

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

📣🚨 New FSU Briefing: With Fear and Favour: Britain’s Policing Emergency

Since the Free Speech Union was founded six years ago, we have consistently raised the alarm about the ideological capture of policing.

Today, the FSU has published a new briefing by our Director of Policy and Research, @DavidRoseUK, examining what has gone wrong with British policing, with a foreword by Rick Prior, former Chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation.

Since the 1999 Macpherson Report, identity-based groups claiming to represent different minorities have acquired disproportionate influence over policing in this country. The ideological capture of the College of Policing and the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) accelerated in the wake of Black Lives Matter.

In an attempt to avoid appearing “institutionally racist”, the police have swung so far in the opposite direction that they now discriminate against white people, particularly white working-class men.

Correcting this over-correction is now a matter of critical national importance. Unless it is addressed, the British public will lose confidence in the police, and policing by consent will begin to break down. This is a national emergency.

There is no evidence that the police were institutionally racist in the first place. Yet a review of the training programmes and policies adopted by forces across the country, at the direction of the College of Policing and the NPCC, reveals anti-white racism in abundance.

This is a national emergency that must be addressed.

Read the briefing below 👇

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

Can anyone explain why Muslim men are so obsessed with sex? They apparently think about it non-stop; they claim they must cage their women in yards of cloth so as to be able to function without being overcome with sexual desire. Why are Muslim men so weak?

Western men don’t need to hide from the sight of women’s bodies; Western women lead normal, fulfilling lives, and this is part of why the West is technologically, scientifically, culturally, and morally superior to Islam.

What is the flaw in Muslim men that makes them so incapable of sexual self control? They have had to cripple their entire society because of this weakness, locking women away and preventing them from making any meaningful contribution outside the home. And we see the results. The less self-control that a group of Muslim men have, the more they restrict and abuse women — the worse their societies become.

Look at Afghanistan, for example. Women there are no better than slaves, and the country itself is a hellhole for everyone but the Taliban leadership — all because the men there are apparently such perverts that even the sound of a woman’s footsteps is enough to cause them to lose themselves in sin.

The lesson is obvious: the worse a society treats its women, the more likely that society is to fail.

So why, then, are Muslim men so slow to grasp this concept? What is it that makes them incapable of the self-control which Western men and boys exhibit every day without thinking twice? What is it about Islam that makes men so obsessed with sex that half of society has to hide itself away so that they can function?

It’s bizarre — and frankly, it’s pathetic that grown men cannot take responsibility for their own thoughts and actions.

It’s also beyond hypocrisy for Muslims to lecture Westerners on morality. Your morals are so weak that you use the sight of a woman’s face — the existence of women, and even little girls — as a justification for male sin. Shame on you. Be men. Take responsibility for your own thoughts, and stop acting like a bunch of pathetic children.

“And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee…”

[Sky News @SkyNews]

Sky's @TrevorPTweets, a former head of the Commission for Racial Equality, says he feel "rage" because the Henry Nowak case is one of many examples of "misjudgements about people based on their race leading to a young life being cut short."

He shares three other examples ⬇️

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

Lammy never fails to disappoint 🙄

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

This was brilliant. Trevor Phillips played a clip of what Keir Starmer said about George Floyd and displayed how Labour MPs expressed their “anger”.

David Lammy said it was fine because they were in opposition.

But not fine for Nigel Farage to use the term “rage” like they did.

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

"police officers who treated a dying young man like a lying nuisance in the name of being anti-racist are perhaps even worse – and calling him ‘mate’ as they did so was the chef’s kiss of utter and complete moral degradation on behalf of those who should have been helping him"

[spiked @spikedonline]

‘I don’t think you have mate’ are words that will go down in infamy. That officer’s casual cruelty to a dying Henry Nowak captured the stinking rot of our DEI-driven police force. The police are playing with fire, says Julie Burchill
https://t.co/U18HNul171

[Jim Hopper @AngloLombard]

An important aspect to this case that not many people are discussing is the predatory nature in which Digwa selected his victim.

From the footage I have seen of Henry and his family and the disturbing details in the post I'm sharing, it's clear that Henry was not a physically imposing person.

He was well dressed and not aggressive in any way. He was polite and even though he was dying he didn't swear at the police, he didn't make demands, he didn't protest against the lies that Digwa and his family were saying.

It's clear to me that Digwa had made a conscious decision to attack Henry because Henry clearly posed no threat to him or his saftey.

His callousness and indifference to Henry's suffering is indicative of the prevailing anti white narratives that saturate the media.

In my opinion Digwa enjoyed watching Henry die. He wanted to punish Henry because Henry represented something Digwa hated. He wanted to punish him, he wanted to have power over him.

This is a mindset shared by many non white people living in the UK.

[Tracy Edwards @TracyEdwardsMBE]

My charity raises funds for girls' toilets to be built in developing countries so girls can go to school for 4 weeks of the month instead of 3. This isn't rocket science. Why are girls in the UK not allowed as much dignity and privacy?

[FreeByTheSea @Free_ByTheSea]

‘The ultimate lesson of the Nowak case is (therefore) larger than one catastrophic police error.

It is that societies which train institutions to prioritise ideological sensitivities over objective reality risk disorientation and gradual civic fragmentation.

When authorities become more alert to possible verbal transgression than to visible human suffering, something fundamental has gone wrong.’
https://t.co/SU0O7ts6fD

[Cathy Larkman 💚🤍 💜🦢🏃‍♀️ @JackMerched]

A jaw-dropping level of dishonesty by @HantsPolice.

Because the only rationale to claim this horrific incident was 'racially aggravated' would be if they actually STILL believed the lying, murdering, Digwa and his brother.

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

"What is truly inhuman is to not feel rage when reading about this boy being taunted by his killer for 10 minutes before being disbelieved, dragged and arrested as he begged for his life." 💯

[spiked @spikedonline]

It isn’t Nigel Farage who is weaponising the Henry Nowak horror. It’s Keir Starmer. He is exploiting the family’s grief to silence public dissent on two-tier policing. It is repugnant, says Brendan O’Neill
https://t.co/admIZobKmS

[TheLadyMusicGeek 💚🤍💜🎶🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @LadyMusicGeek]

Apparently, this was not a silly 'comedy' sketch, it really happened... 🤪

[Jonny Bell @Jonnywsbell]

How anyone fell for this reality-denying nonsense is beyond me........it really is...😕

This is peak insanity...🥴

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Yes, period huts are back. Because girls just aren’t embarrassed and awkward enough about menstruation.

But what happens when the trans-identified boy feels excluded from the period hut? What if he feels less of a girl? Perhaps it would be easier just to tell girls to stay home.

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

This is almost funny coming from the Green Party deputy leader, pictured here with his wife.

[Aja ♀️🇬🇧 @AjaTheEmpress]

So now we've finally opened the box of Muslim homophobia (a box that was made entirely of glass, by the way), can we move on to some of the other issues that people have spent years pretending not to notice?

Can we talk about Sharia courts?

Can we talk about forced marriage?

Can we talk about child marriage?

Can we talk about honour-based abuse and violence?

Can we talk about the treatment of apostates and people who leave the faith?

Can we talk about blasphemy laws and the push to bring them to the UK?

Can we talk about the stabbings, bombings, beheading and diversity bollards?

Can we talk about the persecution of religious minorities?

Can you talka about their history of Islam colonisation?

Can we acknowledge that many many countries were colonised by islam?

Can we talk about slavery within muslim countries, past and present?

Can we talk about censorship and restrictions on free speech?

Can we talk about segregation between the sexes?

Can we talk about cousin marriage and the social issues that can arise from generations of it?

Can we talk about the intimidation faced by some ex-Muslims who speak publicly about their experiences?

And if we have time, perhaps we can discuss the cousin-fucking as well.

What amazes me is not that these conversations never happen. What amazes me is that so many people acted shocked when they finally do.

None of this was hidden.
The box wasn't locked.
It wasn't buried underground.
It wasn't even opaque.
The bloody thing was made of glass.

The information has been publicly available for decades.

The teachings, the laws, the polling data, the court cases, the news reports, the testimonies from ex-Muslims, women, and gay people from Muslim communities—none of it was secret.

Yet for years, anyone who pointed to these issues was told they were imagining things, or being Islamophobic.

Now that people are finally willing to acknowledge the homophobia, perhaps we can have a few more honest conversations.

I'll be here when you're ready.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Shabana Mahmood Called George Floyd's Death An Unspeakable Outrage. She Called Henry Nowak's A Political Grandstanding Opportunity.

On June 4th 2020, four days after George Floyd died in Minneapolis, Shabana Mahmood wrote to her constituents. She described his death as an unspeakable outrage. She shared the anger of the Black Lives Matter movement. She condemned Donald Trump in the strongest possible terms. She pledged to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She signed it with a Black Lives Matter hashtag.

This week Shabana Mahmood stood at the despatch box and told the House of Commons there must be no two tier policing. She said the police have a sacred duty to act without fear or favour. She warned that anyone using Henry Nowak's murder to stoke division should be rejected.

Henry Nowak died on December 3rd 2025. Mahmood said nothing for days. The Commons Speaker had to order the government to make a statement. When she finally spoke she described the national outcry as political grandstanding and accused those naming the problem of stoking division.

Four days after George Floyd died she had already written to her constituents. Four days after Henry Nowak's killer was convicted she had to be ordered to speak by the Speaker of the House.

The letter she wrote in 2020 is worth reading carefully because it is the most precise document available for understanding what happened this week. She writes that her work deeply reflects the cause for social and racial justice. She writes that she will carry on working to ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She writes that she wants her work to continue to be reflective of black and ethnic minority experiences in Birmingham.

Not all voices. Black voices. Not all experiences. Black and ethnic minority experiences. That is the Home Secretary who told Parliament this week there must be no two tier policing. Her own letter is a precise description of two tier political engagement. One standard applied to George Floyd. A different standard applied to Henry Nowak.

The progressive institutional machinery was operational within hours of Floyd's death. The hashtag was ready. The language was ready. The political network was ready. Mahmood's letter was part of that machinery. It was produced within four days because the machinery runs automatically when the case fits the framework. Black Lives Matter had been founded in 2013. By 2020 it had dozens of local chapters, a global network, corporate donors worth hundreds of millions of dollars and political allies embedded across every major Western government. When Floyd died every node of that network activated simultaneously. Mahmood's letter was one activation among millions.

Henry Nowak's case does not fit the framework. His killer used the progressive framework as the murder weapon. His case does not vindicate the ideology of anti-racism training. It exposes it. And the Home Secretary whose entire political career has been built around that ideology found herself at the despatch box this week condemning its most visible consequence while declining to name its cause.

She wrote in 2020 that she would ensure Black voices are heard at the heart of our democracy. She has kept that promise. The question Henry Nowak's family is entitled to ask is which voices were heard at the heart of the institutions that trained the officers who handcuffed their son. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. The NPCC guidance. The College of Policing practice bank. The Metropolitan Police neutrality myth. All of it built by the same political framework Mahmood has spent her career advancing.

There must be no two tier policing. She is right. The letter she wrote in 2020 explains precisely why there is.

[Terf_Rocks @Terf_Rocks]

Courtesy to @moleatthedoor 👏👏