๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป. ๐ฆ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐.
@Velvet_Capital just made that a lot easier on VelvetX
๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป
With the new real-time transaction feed, you can follow the moves happening across the platform instead of waiting to hear about them later.
And with 13M+ traders and KOLs already mapped, thereโs a lot more activity to keep an eye on.
You can:
โ Follow a trader whose strategy interests you
โ See their transactions in real time
โ Spot what theyโre buying or selling as it happens
โ Track your favourite traders without constantly searching for updates
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ: ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป, ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ.
You still have to do your own research, of course. But having visibility into what experienced traders are doing can give you another useful layer of context when navigating the trenches.
Thatโs a pretty interesting edge to have on VelvetX.
Check it out: https://t.co/A4TPXkJsSB
#VelvetX #SocialFAI
Swap cross-chain in a gasless way in seconds
Solana -> Base -> Robinhood -> BNB and more... all in a frictionless environment with VelvetX
Full demo of @degen_mike14 onboarding @theartofwarren to VelvetX droping later this week
this is the kind of conviction trade I respect. Iโve been trading BTC perps on @Velvet_Capital and the execution quality is genuinely different. Intent-based routing, gasless swaps and Velvet Unicorn AI to analyze the setup before I touch it. If you are going to size into this move, the terminal matters.
@LennaertSnyder For anyone trying to execute a setup like this, I have been using @Velvet_Capital for BTC perps. TP and SL orders, gasless execution and Velvet Unicorn AI right there when I need to read the market quickly. Makes trading a tight range a lot less stressful.
@TedPillows Iโve been executing on @Velvet_Capital where I can trade BTC perps, set my TP and SL in advance and let Velvet Unicorn AI help me read what is happening before I enter. Less guessing, better entries.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป. ๐ฆ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐.
@Velvet_Capital just made that a lot easier on VelvetX
๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป
With the new real-time transaction feed, you can follow the moves happening across the platform instead of waiting to hear about them later.
And with 13M+ traders and KOLs already mapped, thereโs a lot more activity to keep an eye on.
You can:
โ Follow a trader whose strategy interests you
โ See their transactions in real time
โ Spot what theyโre buying or selling as it happens
โ Track your favourite traders without constantly searching for updates
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ: ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป, ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ.
You still have to do your own research, of course. But having visibility into what experienced traders are doing can give you another useful layer of context when navigating the trenches.
Thatโs a pretty interesting edge to have on VelvetX.
Check it out: https://t.co/A4TPXkJsSB
#VelvetX #SocialFAI
Price drops hurt, but Iโm reminded why I respect Ethereum Classic.
Itโs not chasing every new narrative. Itโs staying committed to immutability and the original rules.
That conviction matters to me.
@ETCGrantsDao#ETC#CodeIsLaw
Iโve been in enough creator campaigns to notice this:
The biggest frustration usually isnโt losing. Itโs not knowing why you lost.
You create. You submit. A score appears. The campaign ends.
Was it the content? The reach? The track record?
Without visible rules, improvement is guesswork.
Thatโs why I pay attention to @swaymarkapp.
Quality 50%
Performance 30%
Reputation 20%
Published before you post.
๐งต
Analysis Thread
Most creator campaigns claim to reward the โbestโ content.
Nobody knows what โbestโ actually means.
Thatโs the part I like about @swaymarkapp.
Content Quality: 50%
Performance: 30%
Reputation: 20%
Quality asks: was it useful?
Performance asks: did people see it?
Reputation asks: have you been consistent?
Same campaign. Different questions. No black-box score.
๐งต
Another day, another opportunity to scout the markets.
Iโve been watching $BTC closely, and with price hovering around $79Kโ$80K, Iโm setting up a long position with a $100K target before the end of 2026.
But Iโm taking it a step further today: Iโm putting that prediction to the test on @pots_market.
For me, itโs more than making predictions. Every outcome gives me another data point to study, learn from, and sharpen my trading decisions.
$BTC to $100K. Letโs see how this plays out.
What markets are you watching on POTS this week?
@pots_money
Smart contract testing is about to level up.
@contractdotdev is launching a new observation and simulation platform this week and needs ~200 devs to stress-test it before mainnet.
Private testnets that actually replay real mainnet conditions. No experience barrier......just show up ready to break things.
Comment or DM me if you want early access
Almost 50% in under a week, and the market may only be starting to price in the bigger picture. ๐
The Elysium blueprint + HyperEVM latency improvements + 50% of sequencer revenue flowing into $KNTQ buybacks & burns makes the tokenomics thesis seriously interesting.
Is $KNTQ still just an app token, or is it becoming a value-accretive execution layer for #Hyperliquid?
As a social miner in the #DAOVERSE I watch every move closely.
#SocialMining
The client pays well. That number is doing a lot of talking, and it usually talks louder than it should.
Ask most AI tools "should we take this contract" and you get a clean answer built around the revenue. The fee is big, the logo is good, the case study writes itself. Take it.
The problem is what that answer leaves out.
A big contract is not just a fee. It carries a shape. Endless revision cycles. Unclear ownership over deliverables. Approval chains that stall for two weeks per round. The capacity you burn serving one demanding client is capacity you can't spend on three easier ones. None of that shows up when a single model anchors on the payout.
This is where one answer gets dangerous for content and marketing teams. A confident recommendation feels like a decision. But you didn't see the tradeoff. You saw one lens.
Run the same question through Truth and different models pull in different directions. One weighs the revenue and says go. Another surfaces the revision risk, the slow approvals, the opportunity cost of tying up your team. The disagreement is the useful part. It shows you the exact factors you need to pressure-test before signing.
@agnt_hub doesn't decide for you. It puts the revenue and the hidden scope cost into the same view, shows where the models split, and gives you a synthesized answer that carries the conflict instead of hiding it.
A good fee can still be a bad deal once you count what it quietly eats. Worth seeing both sides before the contract becomes the thing your team resents on a Tuesday.
Try the same question in Truth and see where the models split: https://t.co/jA7VO26lpC
Proof that consistency pays with @TheDAOLabs
Workdrop #2624: $615.76 to 28 contributors
@alabasuke leading the pack with $183 ๐
To everyone who mined, posted, and built โ we see you.
Wallets checked?
Good.
Now letโs 2x this next drop
#SocialMining#WhoTweets
Here's why @sleepagotchi thinks sleep data could be more valuable than social media data.๐
Social media tells platforms what you like.
Sleep data reveals how you live.
Your recovery.
Your stress levels.
Your habits.
Your long-term health trends.
For AI, healthcare, and wellness companies, that's infinitely more useful than knowing which posts you clicked on yesterday.
That's why the next battle in tech may not be for your attention.
It may be for your health data.
Sleepagotchi is betting that as this new economy emerges, users shouldn't just generate the data.
They should own a stake in the value it creates. ๐ค