I've been doing some historical research and you guys are not gonna believe this but it appears the American government was originally intended to serve the American people.
Ohio is 64% Christian. Its Jewish population is 1.5%. Its Hindu population is less than 1%. Yet Ohioans must choose between a Christ-rejecting Jew and a Christ-rejecting Hindu conman to lead their state.
Neither of you worship the King that the vast majority of Ohioans call Lord. Both of you hold values theologically and fundamentally opposed to the Christian faith. You are two sides of the same foreign coin, arguing over which non-Christian gets to govern an American Christian people, my people.
every god-fearing generation of men maintain and uphold The Wire Box, a strategic reserve of technical entropy from which the anonymous will rise up and become the prophesied Chosen Wire in Our Time of Need.
No to Ben Shapiro
No to the neocons
No to dual citizens
No to Benjamin Netanyahu
No to cancel culture
No to genocide and ethnic cleansing
No to the Christ-hating Talmud
No to Greater Israel
No to our Jewish oligarchy
AMERICA FIRST. AMERICA FOREVER 🇺🇸
🚨 BREAKING: By stroke of pen, President Trump raises the H-1B Visa fee from $1,000 to *$100,000,* and directs the Secretary of Labor to revise the wage rules to make it much harder for companies to hire foreigners in replacement of American workers.
Massive win.
🚨 "I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION..." - President Donald J. Trump
Using twitter on mobile:
- doomscroller
- chronically online
- wasting your life
Using twitter on desktop:
- sophisticated social media user
- trends researcher
- forming connections with like minded individuals
Here’s a white pill.
Charlie Kirk would gladly welcome Tyler Robinson in heaven were he to repent.
The demonic left cannot comprehend this.
This is how we win.
Caveat: Forgiveness does not mean neglecting justice.
Tyler Robinson should be tried, and swiftly publicly executed for his crimes. And our great hope as Christians is that even Tyler Robinson would repent and believe the gospel before he meets his maker.
And the wildest thing of all is that Charlie Kirk would embrace him as a brother in heaven.
The gospel is a foolish scandal to those who are perishing, but it is light and life to those who believe.
In the wake of Charlie's assassination, many people are demanding that we redouble our devotion to the "free marketplace of ideas." The call seems at first glance courageous and noble. In reality, it is reckless and impractical. We had an open marketplace of ideas; the Left shot it up.
Not only have extreme leftists committed violence in the marketplace of ideas; more scandalous still, mainstream left-wing voices have cheered and made light of the violence. There can be no open marketplace—of ideas or anything else—under such conditions.
Marketplaces require rules, confidence, and common media of exchange. They require, in other words, order. Liberty requires order. One cannot be both free and undisciplined, for instance, or free and ignorant. We know this philosophically, and we also know it intuitively. It's why we don't let toddlers vote.
What we require now is the reassertion of order. We must insist upon the acceptance of basic truths and moral goods, not as the asymptotic goal of endless debate but as the axiomatic foundation without which debate cannot occur. We must foreclose certain antisocial behaviors and suicidal ideologies. We must, to borrow a phrase from Chesterton, stop "the thought that stops thought."
In practical terms, this means we must stigmatize certain evil ideas and behaviors, and we must ostracize people who insist upon them. More practically, this means that people who persist in such disorder should lose their social standing. In certain cases, they should lose their jobs. There must be consequences.
With any political reform, it is wise to err on the side of caution. The offenses that merit such ostracism should be particularly egregious. A good place to begin would be with those who celebrate the murder of an innocent man.
What’s grotesque is to ridiculously twist my words for your own purposes. I said I want good to fight back against evil. What is “irresponsible” about that exactly? Should good not fight back? Should it lay down and surrender? I’ve never called for any violence, and I don’t call for it now, except that which is done legally by the justice system after a fair trial as a punishment of the guilty. And I’ve always been extremely clear about that.
As far as collectivizing blame: well
leftwing violence is endemic, it’s mainstream, widespread, and celebrated by hundreds of thousands if not millions of them, and that has been the case for decades. That’s just the fact. I don’t like it but it’s simply true.