Doc St. Clair

Former US Army (Combat Medic), Combat Wounded, Former Defense Intelligence Agency.

Here to engage. Don't believe me, I'll provide sources.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@elonmusk @Rothmus I want so badly to believe this

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@RealAlexJones No. There is something called "Correlation of Forces and Means", simply speaking, war math.

UK vs Russia goes nuclear because the UK cant compete conventionally.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@DD_Geopolitics There will likely be another attempt on his life...by a lone gunman of course.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

Why is it that the New Right, which frames itself as the standard bearers of justice and the rule of law, are desperate to convict Tyler Robinson before a jury of his peers has an opportunity to?

Why isnt their response simply, "he will have his day in court"?

I think its because the New Right and TPUSA 2.0 need Robinson to be guilty. They need the narrative to be that a 20-something leftist killed Charile. And no amount of information or analysis that counters that claim will be accepted.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

I said he killed the "art of debate", where the idea or premise is discussed, not a contest of who can state more about logical process and fallicies.

We must have watched different debates. Andrew was supposed to argue that the evidence against Tyler Robinson was "overwhelming", which he did not. If anything, he appealed to the authority of the state...which is interestingly enough as fallacy. He tried to pull Candace into a meta about how claims and inferences work. And she called him out on it.

Andrew Wilson has birthed right leaning debaters like Destiny did on the left. The debates, in almost all cases, become clip farming, ad hominem fests.

This is great for low IQ individuals, but for those looking for a real discussion about the topic, its like watching professional wrestling.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

This is not and was never intended for the unwashed masses. However, the unwashed masses' taxed labor will fund it.

Like the movie Elysium, the elite class will benefit from next generation technology and we will be left to work until our bodies give out.

[Aze Λlter @AzeAlter]

If we united.
Our potential as a species is limitless.

This, is the Age of Beyond.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@MrGGWillikers @RealBayes @Mr_LetGo45 You must be a Crucible member lol

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@MrGGWillikers @RealBayes @Mr_LetGo45 You didn't read what I actually wrote. Instead of responding in emotion, actually read whats there.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

Go back to the rhetoric we heard under the Biden administration. Its the same thing just being used by the right now.

What you need to understand is that both sides desire to weaponize the state to target their opposition.

We are headed towards something unbelievably nightmarish.

[Gerald Morgan Jr @GmorganJr]

There is no hope for people who think Lindsay Clancy should walk free.

You do not belong in the same society as the rest of us.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

I would ask you to consider something. What are the implications of those with placement and access to dastardly things happening among the elite class, the Epstien crowd, and our government refuses to legally pursue those who are implicated in human trafficking?

Here is my assessment. They are one in the same and a system will protect itself against exposure that undermines its precieved legitimacy. The corporate world calls it "PR", the government claims "national security interests". In both cases, we are left to know that the elite class is up to no good and there isnt a thing we can do about it.

Call it "evil", "bad", "corruption", or "demonic". Whatever IT is, it boasts the ability to operate in secret, prevent disclosure, and avoid justice when exposed.

[American Patriot 🇺🇸 @_The17thletterQ]

Denzel Washington Breaks the Silence in Hollywood: “We Are Dealing with Powers Superior to Us”

Actor Denzel Washington surprised his followers by going live on Instagram with Pastor Bernard, where he openly expressed his devotion to Christ and his complete trust in God

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@KnoxieLuv “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

James Warburg - 1950 during testimony to the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@DiligentDenizen Indeed

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@joe_Lnu @joe_Lnu always runs a great show! He pushes you to think and understand the reality that law enforcement faces regularly.

[Joe Lnu @joe_Lnu]

EP. 60 | Watch the Evidence. Decide for Yourself. | THE GRAND JURY https://t.co/Ip2xwDgqr3

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

When these people tell you who they are, believe them.

They are no different from the left and will leverage power against their enemies if able to do so. They will weaponize the state against those who engage in divergent thought.

Pay attention.

[NΛTLY DΞNISΞ @NatlyDenise_]

Deport Candace Owens next, pls

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

Do you think any of these people would tell an unsavory truth if it would potentially harm their placement and access?

If you say, no, you are understanding how information operation assets work.

[Kelvia @ConservativeKFC]

Aw, I guess we weren’t invited to the special meeting with the VP at the White House with the cool kids 🤷🏻‍♀️

Interesting guest list.

Wonder what he wanted with these particular shills? 🤔🧐👀

@RealCandaceO @ProjectConstitu @baroncoleman

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

@chelle_talky Because she wasn't sitting a home reading her Bible waiting for her Prince Charming.

[Doc St. Clair @LamareSaint]

I used to be a "fed slopper"...

More than a decade ago, I wore this uniform, and did so proudly. I love my country, but do not love what it has become.

When 9/11 happened, I was a sophomore in high school. Like most people at the time, I watched the event on replay. I accepted the official story and it served as part of the driver to serve in the US Army. I also aggressively defended the official story, quickly leaning into ad hominem against anyone who dared to espouse anything other than the approved narrative at the time.

Then I was wounded in combat, had a career change from Combat Medic (68W2P) to Military Intelligence (35F). I was trained to examine issues in a way that was foreign to me, with objectivity and defensible, fact-supported logic and argumentation. I learned, very quickly, that engaging in things like ad hominem in a debate about an issue actually was a signal that I couldn't defend my position. I was fortunate enough to have mentors that pushed me to think, question, examine, analyze, and acknowledge where there are information gaps.

Then my Army career came to an end. After too many surgeries associated with my combat injury, Uncle Sam gave me my "blue membership card"; i was medically retired. After that, the improbable happened, I was hired as an intelligence officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency through the Wounded Warrior Program. This kicked off an unlikely journey that would send me all over the world where I learned, through direct observation and participation in intelligence activities, that the world is not what we are taught in school, including college.

In a conversation with a senior intelligence officer early in my career, I was challenged about 9/11 and was forced to re-examine what I thought i knew vs what the actual facts were around that event. Needless to say, I could no longer continue with what is now called "fed slopping". Additionally, I became professionally familiar with how information operations operate, how they are managed and shaped over time. This helped me understand why people buy into narrative shaping operations and why it is the simple act of questioning the official story around an event, especially one that doesnt make sense, thag is problematic for those monitoring for what is called "post-operational reflections" (how is the information space reacting to the (insert event here)?).

For those of you that dare to question, keep questioning. However, there is a trap that is intentionally set for those who refuse to drink the kool aid, forcing the questioner to provide a counter claim to the official narrative. What professionals in this space know is that a counter claim requires evidentiary support. Its not simply, "if not X, then Y", its "if not X, why not X, then Y and why Y".

The greatest threat to any narrative is the exposure of the logical inconsistency. How can X be X if A, B, and C are not sound? You do not need to know what happened to prove that you are being lied to. When the questioner is forced to pivot from highlighting what doesnt make sense to making and then defending a counter claim, it removes the burden of explaining the noted inconsistency within the official narrative.

Do not fall into this trap.

What you should expect is what anyone who cant defend a claim to do, shame you, insult you, guilt you, and refuse to acknowledge the fault in their own position.

To people like @DiligentDenizen @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman and many others, keep fighting! You have more people behind you than you could ever imagine. And some of them, like myself, are coming out of hiding to stand by you.