Valid criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic. No argument. Condemnation based on false narratives, lies, & blood libels about Israel you believed instantly is.
@vinhluu@Dr_TheHistories The ISHR it's doing the hard work tracing back and discovering as much about the worms their names their families their histories and their lineages as possible. The International Silkworm Historical Registry is dedicated to do what it takes and leaving no cocoon unturned.
@HAG997800@archeohistories Why do people who don't understand anything bother to comment? It's not prehistoric by Western standards. But we aren't talking about the West. Maybe get a dictionary.
@Pastpassport@historycalendar talk about invalid conclusions and misrepresented circumstances. there's so much wrong with your statement both from historical false equivalence regarding contemporaneous financial systems and from completely biased with characterizations of circumstance. Cranial vacuums exist.
@4Wassmer@HistoryCalendar if you think he would turn Robert Morris the loser then your logic fails likely as a result of a combination of your stupidity and your bigotry
@wh17y@realDonaldTrump the first part is patently untrue and you're attempt at an equivalence is false. Being incapable of valid logic is not evidence of independent thinking. Nor is being susceptible to false narrative propaganda.
@MyBeauDes@Rainmaker1973 certainly not based on anything scientific or observable certainly not respecting what a tree truly is and trying to make it into something it is not. how condescending and cruel, as if the tree should somehow morph and adapt and become something that you would like it to be.
@Rainmaker1973 well here it is again, with the feel-good loonies saying ridiculous anthropomorphizing statements. these statements don't respect trees because they label them as they are not. To apprehend them as you would like them to be is completely disrespectful and even condescending.
@TylerLegendre7@Dr_TheHistories what's the moronic is not understanding the context in which he is using the term Viking which in modern parlance does not have the semantic distinction that you are pointing out.