Eu sou a favor das bets, cassinos, apostas e drogas por puro darwinismo social KKKKKKK… mas, ao mesmo tempo, eu sei que, no mundo real, isso pode abrir espaço para países estrangeiros explorarem e destruírem economicamente uma nação, se vivêssemos num mundo realmente globalizado, sem linhas imaginárias separando países, sem moedas nacionais, com uma única língua, uma única economia, eu provavelmente seria a favor de deixar tudo muito mais livre, então, sabendo que o liberalismo levado ao extremo é uma fantasia meio infantil diante da realidade geopolítica, eu fico com a regulação. E antes que entendam errado, isso não significa que eu esteja do lado do Lula ou de qualquer político brasileiro. Eu tenho menos de 30 anos. Tenho, inclusive, um irmão de 17 anos que considero intelectualmente mais capaz do que boa parte dos políticos deste país. Eu simplesmente não consigo credibilizar uma sociedade que produz esse nível de classe política. Talvez eu comece a dar mais crédito quando tivermos políticos com capacidade intelectual e caráter moral que eu considere superiores aos meus, e, principalmente, superiores à média da própria sociedade. Até lá, eu continuo desconfiando de todo mundo. KKKKKKK galera, eles realmente são burros, não é exagero.
We live in a society where women want to be PROVIDED for by men...
While also COMPETING with those same men for the very resources they expect to be provided with.
Basically, Men have to be provider to the same women they're competing for jobs with in 2026.
The old deal was
Men compete with other men for resources winner gets to provide for women and children.
Women weren't in that competition. The roles were separated. Provider / Provided for.
The new deal in 2026 is:
Women are now IN the competition, competing directly with men for the same jobs, promotions, houses, status.
But the old expectation didn't disappear. Many women still want a man who earns more than them, pays for dates, pays rent, protects, provides.
So from a man's perspective it feels like this:
"I'm fighting you for the same job. If you get it and I don't, I have less money. But you still expect me to have MORE money than you to date you.
I'm supposed to provide for the same person who just out-competed me for the resources I'm supposed to provide with.
It's basically two value systems running at the same time:
Modern egalitarian system in the workplace: "We are equals, may the best person win."
Traditional hypergamous system in dating: "The man should be above me financially."
When you run both systems at once, the man feels like he's playing a game where he can lose twice.
If he loses the job to her, he's broke. If he wins the job, he's called privileged. Either way, he's still expected to pay.
Thats the point I am trying to make. Your opinions are welcome.
"Women are happily single"
"Men are lonely because women don't want them."
“Women started making money and caring about character, and all of a sudden there is a male loneliness epidemic”
"Men need marriage and relationships more than women."
"Men push for marriage because they want a slave."
If you don't want to be a slave to a man, why are you attending singles events?
Why are you creating all these events and attending them, then complaining that lonely men aren't showing up?
I thought y'all didn't need men?
I thought it’s men that’s lonely?