@adelbucetta@zoza_0X@Yellow@CryptoRob35 yeah, agree. trust gets built through repetition and audits, not promises. that's why stuff like on-chain audit trails matters more than the flashy agent demos imo. This is one of the reasons why I'm interested in @w3arew3.
@Hiraweb3 This is the underrated risk imo. everyone's modeling the upside, nobody's modeling what happens post-compromise. Audit trail piece is the part people forget too, @w3arew3's already doing this on Avalanche at 200k+ daily workflows.
@Yurkishiro@joloforU Exactly, harvest now and decrypt later threat is also there, honestly it'd smart preparing ahead. I'm looking into @QANplatform these days, what about you.
What if quantum computers hack Satoshi's 1M $BTC and nobody can stop it?
Binance founder CZ proposes freezing Satoshi's stack for good!
He said "Why don't we give a timeline say within 6 months or 12 months, if those coins don't move then we're going to lock them"
"So, on the new protocol those those on the new protocol there will be like only 20 million coins."
That's $64 BILLION in Bitcoin LOCKED FOREVER!
Would you freeze Satoshi's unmoved $BTC to prevent quantum theft or ... let those stay forever no matter the risk?
@hael_mfon24 I actually stake on @babylonlabs_io and I recently started checking out it TBV native lending testnet too, looks good. I will look into Core since you said it's focused on keeping BTC native.