@MostekCarlie@carrierd#fn4800 it is definitely scary that marketing has such a heavy influence on how our food is grown and processed. It should skew more towards science, and hopefully we as professionals can promote this.
@erica_buenger@carrierd#fn4800 true. I feel like the second one was trying to provide more perspectives and opinions while the first one had a concrete stance.
@carrierd#fn4800 the two articles were different in that the 2nd one gave multiple perspectives from professionals on different topics rather than one opinion. They both seemed to conclude that organic has been put on a pedestal by marketing and the negative factors should be considered.
@erica_buenger@carrierd#FN4800 I agree, especially since Organic farming is such a hot topic in the US. Europe has similar ideas surrounding the topic.
@carrierd#fn4800 I was really surprised to find that conventional and organic both have their pros and cons, and no matter which you choose you will be sacrificing certain desirable qualities. Neither one is considered universally “better” than the other.
Q3- also, the influence that the large-scale farms have on the industry has a huge impact on environmental safety. Their practices are often mirrored by other smaller farms, so their decisions are really important. #fn4800
@carrierd#FN4800 other issues, specifically environmental, include soil erosion/waste of land, greenhouse gases, and climate change which all effect the success of crop yield.
@carrierd#FN4800 my biggest confusion that organic farming is considered to be better than conventional. As Allen and the articles highlighted, there are upsides and downfalls for both types of farming and neither is really “better”.