@DavidDecosimo Leftists have never opposed racism/discrimination in principle. They simply want to be able to dictate which groups get screwed by it, as their evolving political needs demand.
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
"Alleged" is doing a lot of work.
Some of your followers allegedly think you are intelligent, but that doesn't make it so, and you continuously supply evidence to the contrary.
Christine Blasey Fraud made it up.
She had ZERO named-witness support. She named four witnesses, including her own close friend, none of them had any recollection. Her close friend later indicated that she felt pressure to support Fraud at the time and that she did not believe Fraud's story.
I love Helen Andrews' characterization. When it was suggested to you LibTards that actual evidence was required to ruin a man's life it was basically ... "Evidence! You dare to ask for evidence!? Can't you see she's crying!" This will be news to you: the tears of a fragile liberal woman are not evidence.
The Kavanaugh hearings were a disgrace, it was the moment I realized how fucked up and deranged you leftoids were becoming. All this time later and you loonies still aren't ashamed of what you did.
@kavustock@ZaidJilani@asymmetricinfo They allowed an activist to falsely accuse an innocent man of a filthy crime, with his wife, young daughters and the whole world looking on. It was a sickening display of the depths political addicts will sink to in order to score points for their tribe.
@eatingthattreat@lyndseyfifield But she DOES have corroborating evidence. CBF had none.
Your refusal to take LF's evidence into account proves your bias, not her dishonesty.
@eatingthattreat@lyndseyfifield Kavanaugh was an innocent man, a victim of an unscrupulous, attention-seeking liar whose own friends and family disbelieved her malicious claims.
Henry Nowak was stabbed 5 times, then handcuffed and left to die because someone accused him of being racist.
We asked UK police what kind of speech could get you arrested.
They told us saying something offensive was enough.
Henry Nowak died because of police like this.
@realmuckraker That is handing one helluva weapon to the most thin-skinned, or malevolent, individuals in society. This is Salem Witch Trial territory.
@FrontlinesTPUSA@Savsays Lots of parallels between the murders of Austin Metcalf and Henry Nowak, but at least Frisco PD didn't cuff the actual victim.
"labor scarcity can force a society to notice the people it has become accustomed to ignoring. ... That process will be slow, uneven, and incomplete. But it is still better than using immigration as a band-aid for a wound we refuse to treat."
https://t.co/kTlXH52LLf
I love how “no political experience” is the defense for returning power to people who have nothing but political experience and a long track record of destroying everything they govern.
The richest man in America signed a document that could have gotten him hanged, and when someone sneered that he was safe because no one would know which Charles Carroll to come for, he picked up the pen and told the British exactly where to find him.
His name was Charles Carroll, and the colonies were crawling with men who shared it. His own father was Charles Carroll of Annapolis. So when the Declaration of Independence came to him for signing in 1776, a delegate made a cruel little joke. He said Carroll risked nothing by signing. There were so many Charles Carrolls that the King's men would never know which one to hang.
Carroll didn't argue. He leaned over the page and added three words to his signature: "of Carrollton." The name of his estate. His address. He was the only signer in the entire room who wrote down where he lived, and he did it on purpose, so that if the British wanted to come hang the traitor, they would know exactly which door to knock on.
That is who Charles Carroll of Carrollton was.
Here is what makes the moment even sharper. He was not a man with little to lose. He was the single wealthiest man in the thirteen colonies and the largest private landowner among them. While George Washington and John Hancock get talked about as rich men, it was Carroll who topped them all. When he signed, he was wagering the biggest personal fortune in America against a noose.
And he was the last man anyone would have expected to be there at all. Carroll was Catholic. In colonial Maryland, a colony founded as a Catholic refuge that had since turned on its own, Catholics could not vote. They could not hold public office. They could not worship in public. The most educated, wealthiest man in America was, in the eyes of the law, a second-class subject barred from the very government he was helping to create. He had spent seventeen years being educated by Jesuits in France and spoke five languages fluently, and back home he still could not legally cast a ballot.
So he became the only Catholic to sign the Declaration of Independence, putting his name on a revolution that he hoped would build a country with room for men like him. That was its own enormous bet, made by a man the existing system had already shut out.
Then he simply outlived everyone.
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams both died on the same astonishing day, July 4, 1826, exactly fifty years after the Declaration. When they were gone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton was the last living signer left on earth. For six more years he was the final human link to that room in Philadelphia, the last hand that had signed, a living relic of the founding that ordinary Americans traveled to see and shake.
He finally died in November 1832 at the age of ninety-five, fifty-six years after he wrote his address on a treason document and dared the empire to come find him.
The richest man in America. The only Catholic. The last one standing. He had more to lose than any of them, every legal reason to stay quiet, and he signed his full address anyway.
We remember the names we were handed in school. We forget the man who made sure his couldn't be mistaken for anyone else's.
Which Founding Father do you think history shortchanged the most?
🔴 LIVE! @RepBrandonGill leads his first task force hearing exposing Medicaid fraud.
We’re investigating a billion-dollar scheme in Ohio where shell companies billed taxpayers for services never provided. Tune in! https://t.co/HIHyu4gU22
@seanmdav@doc_gero If you want a domestic contrast: On Saturday night, an unarmed, naked white man having a mental health episode was shot and killed in the middle of a residential street by a police officer. The officer is being fired and will probably be charged. MSM interest? Zero.