Agent007thatregularBond

I`m simply an ambassador of Jesus, my ❤️beat is the very sound of His Love for me, I'm an actor, comedian, choreographer and Dancer, got mad love for the Arts

[30MinuteMinistries ✞ @30MinMinistries]

They Boiled John in oil.

Stoned Philip to death.

They skinned Matthew alive.

Crucified Peter upside down.

Hung Luke from an olive tree.

Beheaded James with a sword.

None of the apostles died for a lie, They died because they saw the risen Christ.

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@MasterMaliq The degree to which you accept Jesus limits Him way more than you realise. But because Muhammad taught you not to accept Jesus to be God, and that He was crucified, died and rose on the third day so I could be reconciled with God, that's why I can't accept Muhammad as a prophet.

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@willcast2239 @todo_simms I think you still not getting my point I'm sharing or maybe you a just not interested in getting it and I'm actually OK with that... Cheers...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@themagic_tophat I'm sure Etihad's lawyers will advise them the best way forward and if a win is possible or not. But only time will tell...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@willcast2239 @todo_simms Do you understand my point though?

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@willcast2239 @todo_simms Lol it's not about being dumb, I hear your point. I can't seem to understand how you can't understand mine. It's really pedestrian.
Local laws or institutions shouldn't be expected to normalize concepts that a society's majority explicitly views as contrary to their culture.

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@willcast2239 @todo_simms Don't dodge the question,should the the cultures that view this lifestyle as taboo and have thus stated they don't want to accommodate them be forced to encourage it,because other countries say it's fine. It's like forcing an SDA community eat pork because others think it's fine

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@colinmufc2 @RobhRyan @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs I think I actually admitted they did, I just said CAS didn't rule in a vacuum or make a blind judgement. Please if I missed something where I said the PL never went to the high court and got granted those documents PLEASE show me.

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@colinmufc2 @RobhRyan @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs OK so where did I lie?

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs I simply commented on the difference of the standard of proof used in the institutions and said CAS never made any judgement blindly, I admitted that PL got high court to get them access to more documents. WHERE IS THE LIE 😁😁😁

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs Where did I lie? Point it out and we iron it out...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs To be honest I have not read it all... That's not a true or false question by the way...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs My bad I got that one wrong, but you do realise that Comfortable satisfaction is higher than the standard of proof that the IC uses though right, which was my point to begin with, that the standard of proof of both institutions is different... And your insert proves that...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs Where did I lie?

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs Where did I lie?

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs 1. CAS had extensive access to disclosures, internal emails, and financial documents during the UEFA case. They didn't rule in a vacuum.
2. The PL went to the High Court over a private arbitration dispute regarding the panel's jurisdiction, not to bypass tribunal rules. -

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs Ohhhh wow, attack my character why don't you, all I'm saying is that CAS did not rule in a vacuum, is this a lie?

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@REBELC0RK Under Premier League appeal regulations, an appeal is generally a review of the original decision rather than a complete restart of the trial. However, the rules do provide a specific gateway for new material

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs But understand my initial point was actually about standard of proof required by the different institutions that looked into the case...

[Agent007thatregularBond @LaughalotBond]

@RobhRyan @colinmufc2 @RichardNea86395 @Tom_Morgs -The PL case is still being decided by an independent commission using the exact same standard of proof. Having more documents just means more evidence to weigh, but the burden remains 'more likely than not.'"