@RealCandaceO “People lost their jobs” lasted about half a second before it turned into taking shots at Candace.
For people who claim they don’t like her, your attention is consistent.
Might as well drop your Venmo…maybe she’ll reward you for the free promotion. 😉
Telling someone their opinion is “incorrect” is arrogant. Telling them to go back to an echo chamber while using a pile-on as validation is irony. I don’t know if this is blind allegiance or revisionist history.
I voted for Trump twice. Alex Jones and Tucker defended him, especially around J6. They helped him get elected. Now he turns and they’re the problem?
I still defend my vote but I’m not going to pretend that this is the same Trump that was on that campaign trail.
@bren45000 If everything Candace said was nonsense, debunking it would’ve taken five minutes. Instead we get character attacks. You don’t have to like Candace. But pretending questions don’t exist isn’t the same as answering them.
Of course the outrage over Venezuela has nothing to do with Trump.
Scientists call this the Political Cooties Effect — perfectly fine… until his name touched it. 🦠
Sentiments of Venezuelans
I’m going to say this once, and I don’t care if it makes people uncomfortable.
If you have never lived in Venezuela
If you did not grow up there
If you did not watch your country collapse in real time
If you did not stand in food lines
If you did not watch your parents lose everything they built
If you did not have to leave your home with nothing
Then shut the fuck up.
You do not have an opinion.
Your opinion does not matter.
And you don’t get to lecture anyone about what’s happening there.
I’m Venezuelan.
I lived there most of my life until my early twenties.
I watched my country go from a functioning democracy to full blown socialism right in front of my eyes.
This is not politics to me.
This is trauma.
Before socialism, Venezuela was not perfect, but it worked.
There was trade.
There was money coming in.
There was investment from the US.
There were jobs.
There was food.
There was medicine.
My family had five businesses.
We had our home
We had investments.
We had a future.
Then the government started nationalizing everything.
Private companies were taken.
Foreign investors were pushed out.
Imports were blocked.
Price controls destroyed production.
Corruption exploded.
And everything died.
Not slowly.
Violently.
People didn’t suddenly become poor because of “capitalism” or “the US” or whatever bullshit slogan people like to repeat online.
They became poor because socialism destroyed incentives, destroyed production, destroyed trust, and destroyed hope.
People today in Venezuela are not debating ideology.
They are trying to survive.
They are trying to find food.
Trying to find medication.
Trying to keep their families alive.
So when I see people in the West posting from comfortable homes, full fridges, stable currencies, and safe streets talking about “imperialism” or “US bad” or “Trump this or that”
No.
It’s not complicated.
You’re just ignorant.
China is not rebuilding Venezuela.
Russia is not rebuilding Venezuela.
Cartels are not rebuilding Venezuela.
They are stealing.
They are extracting.
They are draining what’s left.
If the US comes in and reinvests
If refineries get rebuilt
If infrastructure gets restored
If imports open back up
If food, water, and medicine become accessible again
If people can work and earn with dignity
Then yes.
Let them take all the oil they want.
Because at least something gets built instead of destroyed.
This is something to celebrate.
Not because it’s perfect.
But because for the first time in a long time, there is hope.
Hope that families can eat.
Hope that people don’t have to flee their country.
Hope that Venezuela can function again.
If you’ve never lived through a country collapsing
If you’ve never watched socialism destroy everything around you
If you’ve never had to leave your home because staying meant starvation
Then again
Shut the fuck up.
This isn’t theory.
This isn’t politics.
This is lived experience.
By Stephen Subero
🚨 URGENT
Two days ago I was contacted by a high-ranking employee of the French Government. After determining this person’s position and proximity to the French couple, I have deemed the information they gave me to be credible enough to share publicly in the event that something happens.
In short, this person claims that the Macrons have executed upon and paid for my assassination. Yes, you read that correctly. More specifically, that the green light was given to a small team in National Gendamarie Intervention Group. I am told there is one Israeli that is on this assasination squad and the plans were formalized.
Again, this person provided concrete proof that they are well placed within the French government apparatus.
Further to this point, this person claims that Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French legion 13th brigade with multi-state involvement.
Journalist Xavier Poussard’s life is also at risk. This is deadly serious. The head of state of France apparently wants us both dead and has authorized professional units to carry this out.
I ask that every person RETWEET and share this.
I do not know who in the American government can be trusted, since this source claims our leaders are aware. But I have more specific information which is definitively verifiable, should they care to reach out to me.
To the brave official in France who did this because they were so moved by the evil of Charlie’s public execution to risk their own life— May God bless you. Truly.
Let all be revealed.
Reminder:
Winning by 7 million votes doesn’t erase four years of inflation, border chaos, foreign policy disasters, a checked-out presidency, and an administration that couldn’t communicate its way out of a paper bag.
This isn’t “one bad debate performance.”
It’s the moment Democrats realized they couldn’t keep pretending the emperor had clothes.
@DefiyantlyFree Your whole brand is “calling out what the media ignores,” yet you’re conveniently ignoring the biggest pile of unanswered questions sitting right in front of you.
Selective outrage.
The problem isn’t whether two things can be true at once — everyone understands nuance. The issue is that you’re reducing this to “Candace is a self-serving demon stoking conspiracies” without actually addressing any of the inconsistencies being raised.
Saying “people only resonate because of bias” is just another way of dismissing their questions instead of engaging with them.
The question isn’t whether Candace is a saint or a “demon.” It’s if the inconsistencies she highlighted are real. There’s documented evidence they are.
Those deserve to be addressed regardless of who pointed them out. Because right now it sounds less like we disagree on the facts, and more like you just don’t like who brought them up…speaking of bias 😉
Calling Candace a “distraction” is avoiding the actual issue-she and Charlie were close. She isn’t a random podcaster stirring drama — she’s the only one with the spine to question glaring inconsistencies surrounding her friend’s assassination. That’s not division, that’s loyalty.
She pointed out where the timeline, digital evidence chain, and motive narrative don’t line up — which still haven’t been explained by law enforcement or media.
Questioning the government is not “sowing doubt.” Conservatives spent decades demanding accountability from state and federal agencies for a reason — because blind trust is how corruption survives. Do you believe our government and law enforcement’s story with JFK? MLK? Weapons of mass destruction? 9/11?
If the official story is solid, it should withstand scrutiny. If it falls apart when someone starts asking questions…the distraction isn’t Candace. It’s everyone insisting the conversation stop.
If you’re going to join a conversation, you should probably learn how to have one.
Comment + block is the equivalent of an online tantrum🙄
If anyone wants to pass this onto ‘Gunpowder & Prayer’ as I took the time to answer her-
You keep saying “it’s been debunked” like that magically transforms a talking point into evidence.
If it was actually debunked, you’d be able to articulate what was debunked — instead of repeating “read the indictment” like a prayer bead.
I did read it. That’s why I have questions.
Questions you can’t answer, because your entire stance is “Trust the narrative.”
Citing “Charlie’s team and close friends” is an interesting take considering they’re the exact people with the most to lose if the official story falls apart. Of course they’re going to control the messaging. PR 101. Did you see his top guy on the phone walk away? Just curious.
Candace didn’t “not know what was in the indictment.”
She quoted the inconsistencies directly , which is why this entire conversation exists in the first place.
Funny how the moment someone challenges the story, the go to defense is ‘idol worship.’ That was quite the gymnastics to go from supporting someone asking questions to claiming I’m treating her like an idol.
I’m just not allergic to scrutiny. If that feels threatening, that says a lot more about your argument than mine.
@HotepJesus Candace didn’t get “a podcast boost from tragedy.”
She got attention because she refused to fall in line when everyone else started repeating the same script despite the holes in it.
It’s nice to see that people still value critical thinking.
That’s sleight of hand you’re trying to pull. Pointing out inconsistencies in a timeline isn’t the same thing as saying “TPUSA killed Charlie.”
Saying “everyone betrayed him” isn’t an accusation of who did anything — it’s pointing out that the people closest to him are shutting down questions, and actively suppressing scrutiny.
No one owes loyalty to Erika and no one owes silence to protect TPUSA’s image.
If TPUSA’s reputation is so fragile that basic questions are interpreted as “attacks,” that’s not loyalty, it’s cult psychology.
So to correct your correction-
Scrutiny isn’t accusation.
Asking who knew what and when is not the same thing as naming a killer.
You’re not describing Candace — you’re describing what happens when someone leaves the cult and refuses to come back.
If pointing out contradictions is “propaganda,” then your definition of truth is just “whatever I already agree with.”
That’s indoctrination, not politics.
Btw-The NAACP didn’t make her. They used her & then got mad she figured out the game.