لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے سم سویپ فراڈ کیس میں محمد عثمان کی ضمانت منظور کر لی۔ عدالت نے قرار دیا کہ موجودہ شواہد انہیں مبینہ فراڈ سے جوڑنے کے لیے کافی نہیں، اس لیے معاملہ مزید تفتیش کا متقاضی ہے اور وہ ضمانت کے حقدار ہیں۔
#LahoreHighCourt#trending#legalethics
The Lahore High Court granted bail to accused in a SIM-swap fraud case, holding that the available evidence did not sufficiently connect him to the alleged fraudulent SIM activations. The Court found his case required further inquiry, making him entitled to post-arrest bail.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ بینک صارفین کا ڈیٹا بھی قانوناً جائیداد ہے، جس کے غلط استعمال پر فوجداری کارروائی ہو سکتی ہے۔ عدالت نے یو بی ایل افسر کی درخواستِ ضمانت مسترد جبکہ ٹیلی کام فرنچائز سے وابستہ ملزم کو مزید تفتیش کی بنیاد پر ضمانت دے دی۔
#CyberCrime#furry#LHC
The Lahore High Court decided two post-arrest bail petitions arising from a SIM-swap banking fraud. It held that bank customer data constitutes "property" under PECA and may attract criminal breach of trust under the PPC. Finding sufficient evidence against....
(Cont.)
Finding sufficient evidence against the UBL officer, it denied his bail, while granting bail to the telecom franchise operator, holding that the evidence against him required further inquiry.
(Cont.)
A foreign national, married to a Pakistani woman since 1994 and father to their children, was charged with staying in Pakistan after his visa expired. The Supreme Court granted him bail, saying the case was about overstaying, not illegal entry,
(Cont.)
An FIR was registered at Police Station Karor Pakka under Section 289 PPC after a citizen allegedly died following a dog attack. The case concerns whether the person having possession or control of the animal negligently failed to take reasonable precautions,
(Cont.)
thereby endangering human life and attracting criminal liability.
تھانہ کرور پکا میں کتے کے حملے سے شہری کی مبینہ ہلاکت پر دفعہ 289 تعزیراتِ پاکستان کے تحت ای�� آئی آر درج کی گئی.
(Cont.)
Routine official delays, paperwork, and administrative approvals cannot excuse late filings or revive petitions filed after the prescribed limitation period.
The Supreme Court held that limitation is a statutory requirement, not a mere procedural formality. Court deadlines must be followed strictly, and government departments are subject to the same rules as everyone else.
Islamabad High Court ruled that when a foreign court already fixes child maintenance, a mother cannot pursue a parallel maintenance claim in Pakistan for the same liability and period.
The Supreme Court held that pre-dismissal service must count towards pension after reappointment, while denying back benefits for the period employees remained out of service.
وکیل نے عدالت میں یقین دہانی کرائی کہ سائل متنازع جائیداد خالی کر دے گا، مگر بعد میں سائل نے اس بیان سے انکار کر دیا۔ سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ دھوکے یا اختیار نہ ہونے کا واضح ثبوت نہ ہو تو سائل وکیل کے عدالتی بیان کا پابند ہوگا۔
#SupremeCourt#LegalEthics#ریاست_ہے_تو_سیاست_ہے
A lawyer assured the court that his client would vacate the disputed property. Later, the client denied authorising the statement. The Supreme Court ruled that a client is generally bound by a lawyer's courtroom statement unless fraud or lack of authority is clearly proved.
The Supreme Court held that family pension belongs only to eligible dependents under pension rules, not legal heirs. However, benefits earned before death remain part of the deceased's estate.
The Supreme Court ruled that no pre-emption right arises when property is exchanged instead of sold. It restored the Trial Court's decision and dismissed the pre-emption suit.