Ya ya I COULD flirt with men I’m attracted to or HEAR ME OUT I could yearn for them unrequitedly at a safe distance until I’m driven to a state of madness.
@GymShortsStuds To all of the OF creators out there, this is the most annoying, spammy thing yall do and it’s actually a huge turn off. Sending out PPV stuff is fine, and an intro message is totally ok, but this shit is so transparent and fake and it’s a detriment to your business.
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.
And it's making you a worse person because of it.
Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.
That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.
It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.
Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.
The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.
Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.
This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.
Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.
You're right. They're wrong.
Even when the opposite is true.
If someone takes a “you vs them” approach to fitness rather than a desire to help everyone be the best version of themselves they can be, I have a feeling he’s probably thinking more about making a quick buck than actually giving you the opportunity to “surpass” him in any way.
Ok so I don’t mind if this is your fetish and you actually get off to it, more power to you, but idk if I’d entrust my physical health and wellness to some guy who unironically refers to others as “betas” for his personal training sales pitch.
What I love about this is that this person is not a breed of their own; that there are people out there that think that just because they went to the gym a few times means that they can talk down to people, that anyone else’s opinions are less than. This attitude is not new.