The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
Moronic copycats. S300 and s400 are not necessary for ballistic missile guidance - these missiles use rudimentary inertial systems, which also accounts for their lack of high precision except with their more advanced systems, about 10 percent of their missiles. Decapitate all you want, anti-air defense systems are meaningless. Idiot programmed ai clickbait
37 years ago today, the CCP launched its brutal crackdown on the peaceful student-led protests in Tiananmen Square. What made this atrocity especially shocking was that it unfolded before the eyes of the world, broadcast live on TV.
In the decades since, the CCP has worked relentlessly to erase this chapter of history. Many younger Chinese have little knowledge of this horrific event, and this year, for the first time, authorities banned families from visiting the public cemetery where many victims are buried.
Meanwhile, here in the U.S., leftists attempt to rewrite history by drawing false comparisons between rioters and the Chinese students who stood up to a tyrannical regime, and between ICE enforcing immigration law and the CCP’s military opening fire on protesters.
We must not forget the history and horror of the Tiananmen Square massacre. We must teach future generations about the horrors of communism and how precious liberty truly is.
On This Day — June 4, 1967
Israel stood completely alone — betrayed by its allies and facing annihilation.
France — Israel’s main arms supplier — imposed a total weapons embargo on Israel at the direct order of President Charles de Gaulle.
Already, every major Western power, including the United States, had Israel under a weapons embargo.
The Israeli Cabinet met in emergency session as massive Arab armies gathered on its borders. Egypt alone had nearly 100,000 troops and 1,000 tanks in Sinai, with Jordan, Syria, and Iraq adding more forces. Arab leaders were openly calling for Israel’s destruction.
A cable from U.S. President Lyndon Johnson made the situation brutally clear:
“Israel will not be alone unless it decides to go it alone.”
Israel got the message.
With no strategic depth, vastly outnumbered, and abandoned by its supposed friends, the Cabinet voted 12–2 to launch a preemptive strike on the largest Arab military, Egypt (which had already committed an act of war by closing the Straits of Tiran). The war would begin the next morning.
The mood across Israel was somber and resolute. Parks were dug up for mass graves. Schools became bomb shelters. Teenagers filled sandbags. The entire nation understood it faced an existential threat — a potential second Holocaust.
Yet on June 5, Israel acted.
This was the moment a small, isolated nation chose survival over waiting for the mercy of others.
Never forget how alone Israel truly was on the eve of the Six Day War.
Years ago, 20?, when Dudley led RMGO we had a protest in south Denver. We were there because tom tancredo had managed to beat the mental health condition he invented in order to avoid the draft and won the congressional election in Arapaho county. He was backed by rmgo and a lot of us put in shoe leather for him. I think he was in power a month before he stopped taking Dudley’s calls and aligned with Dennis hastert, the house leader for the gop. I remember his face as he drove past us in a limo also occupied by hastert. No wave, he turned his face away from us.
It was money politics then, and it’s money politics now. Tancredo needed hastert’s backing for his next race, it meant millions. Grassroots sounds so nice until you are confronted by the ridiculously well-funded NGO’s of the dem party.
Paraphrasing Kissinger, “countries don’t have principles, they have interests” and our politicians are just playing the game as it exists. It’s the scorpion and frog paradox, and the frog is ALWAYS the voters.
God save me, this is the same non-sequitur subject. Optimized by command is not the same as optimized by the soldier. FFS a soldier regularly rucks 80-100lbs, so a 1.5 pound difference is certainly not NOTHING but the biggest weight penalty is munitions. The only army system where there is a choice is in Soviet rifles.
Modern combat arms have evolved to use many materials - this argument started when FN competed with HK to address FMS. turns out, milled receivers were significantly more expensive than stamped ones wrapped around a solid, milled, trunnion.
Create/copy newer clickbait
Let’s say, for instance, you are trying to keep your family’s rifles running, let’s say there are 5 shooters among all - using ar15s. Little parts do break, but in the field getting back up in the fight? You’re going to want to swap. Now you just have to imagine why your family is in a large firefight……
Brothers, good advice - but please take it a step further. Box breathing, 3-7-4 breathing, etc. there are specific patterns of breathing that are used by professionals all over the world, share these methods. “Take a breath and relax” has benefits, but some people need more - provide it here - why not sheriff? I know you have staff trained in stress reduction
Just do it 🦖
Too long, too many lives - too many children to have to explain why their parents have scars or are missing body parts. You fight so that someday your grandchildren will have no such memories I pray it doesn’t get that far, because not having memories and stories about what is worth our lives and families. May no Ukrainian child ever believe that peace is free-of-charge.
Slava Ukraini!💕
@real_bechambers@ChristianDewitz Happy birthday Danny, thank you for showing up to work everyday, it says a lot of positive things about you and about your values. May you have many more birthdays 🥳