Le Ref

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@RumpleFinkin @Record_Politics Except it isn't. It's part of the ongoing investigation. Electoral law (and fundraising law) are clear that if you call something "ringfenced for X" then it can only be spent on X

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@OnJambos41038 @Record_Politics Scotland. Where worshippers of the SNP are so deluded they believe acts of criminality are OK

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@AdamCrafton_ So although the stadiums are mandated by several codes to provide free drinking water, FIF are going to ensure fans have to buy at least 1 drink. Turning the fountains off would probably be illegal in several states and cities

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@AP694KDY @Record_Politics Oh yes, they can be held accountable. Pity the Scottish Media won't do that.

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

And until they do, then the current law (supported by the EHRC guidance) remains valid and should be obeyed.
That's not what they're doing, though, is it. Otherwise they'd have asked for a Private Member's Bill to allow them to try and change the law to allow self-ID. But they won't do that as it would be political suicide.
What they're doing is trying to perpetuate the current situation where all the groups captured by the Trans movement can continue to say "We can't obey the law unless we have guidance and as we don't have guidance, we're going to continue to break the law and to allow men in women's protected single sex spaces. Because we can do what the fuck we want and have a massive pot of taxpayer's money to spend in court"

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

Several Acts of Union created the UK.
It is a Unitary Sovereign state. No Treaty binds it together as the Acts involved the signatories ending their status as sovereign states and becoming part of the single new state.
It didn't, for example, cease to exist in 1919 when part of its territory seceded.
And secession is PRECISELY what would happen - the withdrawal of a group, region or state from a larger state. Should Scotland secede, the position in International Law is clear - and was covered in 2014 when the UK confirmed it would be the continuing state and retain all its individual Treaty obligations, memberships and international accountabilities. Nobody thought this controversial and nobody thought a Yes vote in 2014 would end the UK.
If you think Scotland leaving the UK dissolves the UK, that massively changes the constitutional status of such a referendum. It would have to be asked of all the UK, not just Scotland. That what you want?

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@xaorsa_online @toadmeister No it wouldn't. The UK would be the continuation state in international law.

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@hotscotty21 @Record_Politics Thyre essentially different things. The SNP appear to have fraudulently failed to ring fence the money and used it for "general expenditure". Then Murrell used some of that "general expenditure" illegally

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@AP694KDY @Record_Politics Sadly Barnett consequantials can't be hypothecated by Westminster. The SNP can spend them on what they like

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@G4ilM @Record_Politics Just shows what a bunch of gullible sheep they are. Deciding criminal behaviour should be rewarded..

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@doctor_rahmeh @SikhPA "Nobody had dropped an atomic bomb until 2 isolated incidents. We should recognise this is not a pattern."

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@Real_Gene_Genie @jk_rowling "Whoever said money can't buy happiness didn't know where to shop"

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@ScotNational And several hundred non-misogynists didn't

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@triffic_stuff_ It's unclear to me how a simple "yes" or "no" answer could possibly impact any ongoing investigation.

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@ProfFeynman Is that how certain people came to believe the gospel that a small trace element and mild greenhouse gas was the complete driver of all global climate?

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@rita_rake It remains a complete mystery to me why the Church of England is losing our respect as quickly as it's losing worshippers.

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@Shilisad1 @BevJacksonAuth @KBadlan @stellacreasy @NadiaWhittomeMP @akuareindorf @Scott_Wortley Demonstrate what evil bastards they are

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

Why? The UK has the right to protect its territorial integrity. Unless there is overwhelming evidence that one particular part of the country wishes to secede (which would be over 50% of total electorate support for a party supporting it) the Government has the right to say "no".
Stop trying to appease the secessionists - they're unappeasable. The last thing Scotland needs is the disaster of accidental independence - voting for it because of some "English" issues rather then on the basis of a clear definition of what it would mean.

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@101sfinance @Osint613 So you agree there has been no ceasefire by the Arabs since at least 1948 when they started their continuous attempt to eradicate Israel?

[Le Ref @LeRef5]

@MirrorPolitics Fuck off