You're probably thinking of the 2014 PLOS and other trials/reviews when taking this stance. However, the dose studied in these trials is ofte the "binge" type of say 1.5g/kg body weight - which equals to about 1.5 standard BOTTLES of 12% wine for an average 70kgs person. A lot! That was shown to inhibit protein synthesis about 30ish %.
Anyway, the point is, the dose ACTUALLY matters. Why?
Well, there are also studies that show one-off doses off up to 0.25g/kg body weight INCREASES testosterone in men. That's about one bigger glass of wine after dinner.
On top of that, there are COUNTLESS other factors to consider in the context of N=1...
Light environment, temperature, sleep and the state of your mitochondria and genetic prediaposition etc all create that context.
But, in general, I would not say "a lick" will inhibit "gainz". In general.
Just my 2 sats.
Btw, kad će naši zemljaci izvaditi prst iz bulje i prestati ganjati fiat pozicije, nagrade i institucije?
BIP110 failing would mean either the Bitcoin community supports turning it into a CSAM sharing network, or that the community can be successfully gaslit into doing so unknowingly, or that someone else other than the community controls Bitcoin.
In none of those scenarios does Bitcoin have any reasonable hope of fulfilling its purpose.
Folks don't realise it but the main cause of MSTR & Saylor's troubles is Bitcoin Core. This entity has downgraded their underlying asset. BTC's been selling off since V30 went live. Saylor failed to call Core out. He's paying the price & deservedly so.
FIAT AROUND AND FIND OUT!
#BIP110 is going to happen. The time to rally for a URSF was months ago…if there is no strong reason to reject this soft fork (which there isn’t) then it will just become an accepted thing by everyone as is a tightening of the rules. It’s just a return to what Bitcoin always was until 2023. It’s not claiming to remove spam altogether, but it will definitely mitigate it. Fck the taproot inscriptions exploit, and fck the UTXO bloat. If plebs can’t run full nodes Bitcoin is dead 💀 this is about healing Bitcoin 🧡
Taproot was the worst rule changes ever made to Bitcoin + the worst soft fork activation mechanics ever used for Bitcoin aka Block Template Cartel activation.🤮
Don’t be mad. Just admit mistakes were made and be part of the correction.
Run Knots + BIP-110 + DATUM + Ocean
MSTR looked like an obvious honey pot, enticing Bitcoiners to trade their sovereignty away for leverage.
But now Saylor is literally spelling out the future he’s planning for you with STRF/C/K/E/D: you take all the risk, he gives you a slip of paper and keeps the Bitcoin.
How is this any different from crypto?
And look at our timelines. He’s captured what were once Bitcoiners who ruthlessly defended self-custody and transacting in BTC, into a cult that posts Saylorisms.
Every cycle this continues only makes the inevitable unwind larger.
Bitcoiners, jump ship before you get rekt.
@BobanKarovic Kad ce vise sve da se srusi je moje pitanje
I jos jedno, koliko sranja vise treba glupim Srbendama da se desi da izvuku palac iz bulje i kupe Bitkojn?
We're never going to Mars (or any other planet in the entire Milky Way)
✅ No breathable atmosphere
✅ Deadly radiation (will kill you in 1 year)
✅ Extreme cold (-60 Celsius)
✅ Toxic soil
✅ Dust storms
✅ No liquid water
✅ 6–9 month supply trips
✅ No emergency evacuation
✅ Difficult food production
✅ Difficult energy production
✅ Difficult manufacturing
✅ No obvious export economy
✅ Constant dependence on Earth
✅ Massive psychological challenges
So much for Mars. There are no other suitable planets in our solar system, and the nearest star system would take us 30,000 years to get to with current technology.
Even with 100x better tech, the distances are too vast.
We're stuck on Earth.
Strategy should stop trying to invent perpetual preferreds and create a Bitcoin-backed maturity ladder instead.
STR30, STR31, STR32, STR33, STR34.
Each security:
• Fixed maturity (2030-2034)
• Pays twice monthly
• Publicly traded
• Backed by a dedicated Bitcoin collateral pool
Example:
STR30
• Matures 10/31/2030
• $2B issuance
• Secured by 40,000 BTC
Investors can verify the collateral on-chain.
No mystery. No reset risk. No perpetual duration.
A pension fund may not buy Bitcoin.
A pension fund may not buy MSTR.
But a 2030 bond yielding 8-10% backed by 220% Bitcoin collateral?
That's a very different conversation.
Instead of building more layers of financial engineering, Strategy could create the first true Bitcoin yield curve.
Strive could also do this.
@JoshMandell6@Z06Z07@phongle@saylor@ColeMacro
If you don't want Bitcoin to change to allow data storage (ie, Core30), then you want BIP110.
BIP110 is just itself a counter-fork to reject Core30's controversial changes.
Without it, a tiny fringe minority would have succeeded in materially changing Bitcoin without consensus.
I’m not employed by anyone.
I have no sponsors.
I’m not invested in anything else than BTC.
I don’t give a fuck about being shunned by influencers and talking heads.
I just want Bitcoin to succeed in separating money and state.
That’s why I support BIP-110
Just a little thread documenting how unhinged @adam3us is in his attempts to have people NOT read the CAPTURE articles.
Let's start with the "sHinoBi deBunKed iT in MinuTes!" ones:
DITTO. I just flew half way across the globe to inform Savages in EU and Asia we have Rothschild/Rockefeller Math/Physics hacks being introduced by tech criminals in Core and Treasury companies trying to ossify Bitcoin to help give governments they control power back. "The Bitcoin Landauer Attack" is one few saw coming.
The Rothschilds Paid Epstein 25 million a year too hack the Human Genome Project to protect Rockefeller and to hack the OG's of Bitcoin associated with MIT math and physics dept to place the idea of how to use an obscure thermodynamics principle that is an axiomatic law for decentralized systems that use energy to operate to slowly destroy it over 130 years.
The idea was placed in 2014-2015 and then from there it went to Google and to ChainLab and it was finally executed by a capture core developer who using inscriptions. That Core Dev was isolated by the Bitcoin OGs operating with the people who controlled Epstein, but he followed a specific career path and was allowed to launch the attack. Below is how the Rockefeller's used it in medicine.
I was not able to show this slide in Prague. So I described how they did it. To link this plot to Epstein the Core dev posted an inscription to the basechain that showed a cartoon Pepe riding a skate board and it was linked to childhood sexual abuse visual images that were then subsequently blocked out. One of my former patients sent me this information and told me he worked with the devious dev and told me they were using Landauer's Principle to first degrade the chain, ossify it, and then implement their solution in the next few decades. All Bitcoin Savages must know who these fuckers are and absulutely treat them like Roger Ver.
This attack was far more dangerous to Bitcoin because it is an existential threat to the base chain's existence. I told Brunnell this in Prague and her reaction to this idea was not well recieved. The Press has a duty to report the news not report on what they like and don't like.
Node Runners are the immunse system of BITCOIN and we can eliminate these pathological fucks from our ecosystem when we only use nodes signaling for BIP-110. Anyone who argues otherwise does not understand the physics or math of Landauer's principle because it is an AXIOMATIC law of nature that will slowly ruin Bitcoin with TIME ENTROPY.
Bitcoin’s most crucial property is being decentralized.
That is not compatible with being governed by a deceitful and arrogant priesthood of funders and developers who censor and exclude opposition while pretending to be responsible stewards of the Bitcoin ethos.