@BolashJeff79708@RapidResponse47@POTUS …you’re right to call him out
but it’s probs actually a troll
from N. Korea/China/Russia/Iran
trying to divide us
🇧🇪 Thibaut Courtois on the quality of the USA team compared to their other opponents at the World Cup:
🗣️ Courtois: "Everything that happened before the match didn't necessarily play a role. I read that and laugh about it. I felt a bit more confident today that we would win than against Senegal. They were a stronger team than the US, and that was evident today."
🇰🇷🔥 Another strong signal for $BRN / $BRCHF.
AsicLand says it’s transitioning major chip development projects into mass production, targeting its best annual results ever thanks to expanding ASIC programs, AI data center demand, and global growth.
Even more importantly, AsicLand highlights its AI processor development agreement with BrainChip, saying the partnership expands its business into Edge AI and neuromorphic computing.
The story is becoming clearer:
✅ ASIC commercialization accelerating
✅ AI data center opportunities expanding
✅ Global manufacturing ramp
✅ BrainChip positioned in next-generation Edge AI
Every new AsicLand success increases the value of a partner building the future of custom AI silicon.
The commercialization phase has begun. 🚀
https://t.co/DEquLlkgpq
A critical element that the "rulebook purists" arguing Balogun deserved a red card are conveniently overlooking:
BALOGUN was the one who was challenged from behind.
The Bosnian player played *through* Balogun from behind and placed himself in the path of Balogun's natural step.
When he begins taking that step, Balogun has no idea the Bosnian player would even be in front of him. In that sense, you can't really even consider his move a "challenge." It was simply a step that incidentally landed in the same place the opponent's foot did.
In fact, the reason Balogun's step came down so hard is *because* the Bosnian player challenged into him and knocked him off balance.
This is not "reckless" or "excessive force" by any stretch of the imagination.
The red card was *obviously* unjustified from the outset. The only thing FIFA got wrong here is not immediately suspending the red card after the match.
A critical element that the "rulebook purists" arguing Balogun deserved a red card are conveniently overlooking:
BALOGUN was the one who was challenged from behind.
The Bosnian player played *through* Balogun from behind and placed himself in the path of Balogun's natural step.
When he begins taking that step, Balogun has no idea the Bosnian player would even be in front of him. In that sense, you can't really even consider his move a "challenge." It was simply a step that incidentally landed in the same place the opponent's foot did.
In fact, the reason Balogun's step came down so hard is *because* the Bosnian player challenged into him and knocked him off balance.
This is not "reckless" or "excessive force" by any stretch of the imagination.
The red card was *obviously* unjustified from the outset. The only thing FIFA got wrong here is not immediately suspending the red card after the match.
A critical element that the "rulebook purists" arguing Balogun deserved a red card are conveniently overlooking:
BALOGUN was the one who was challenged from behind.
The Bosnian player played *through* Balogun from behind and placed himself in the path of Balogun's natural step.
When he begins taking that step, Balogun has no idea the Bosnian player would even be in front of him. In that sense, you can't really even consider his move a "challenge." It was simply a step that incidentally landed in the same place the opponent's foot did.
In fact, the reason Balogun's step came down so hard is *because* the Bosnian player challenged into him and knocked him off balance.
This is not "reckless" or "excessive force" by any stretch of the imagination.
The red card was *obviously* unjustified from the outset. The only thing FIFA got wrong here is not immediately suspending the red card after the match.