@NintenDioSWITCH@Nesphalim Same story. Grok 4.1 and 4.2 were good as AI/SI GM, but now it's absolutely awful. I have a big research about it. @xai could you fix it?
@LithiumFlower22@grok But now, Groks makes mistakes in text. A lot of simple mistakes in morphology. It's not acceptable for frontier LLM, where second L stands for language.
@bridgemindai@bridgebench Is it possible to compare subscriptions from different companies within one tier? For example supergrok, Claude pro and chatgpt plus?
@KineticElle New model every few weeks - it's quite smart marketing strategy to decrease amount of unsubscribe users, but still bad user experience. Look, if you have one model flops - company can say: no worries, you'll receive a better one in 4 weeks. Imagine, use bad model for 3-4 months?
@4everwalkalone@finkd@spacexai Even not second best. Around 3rd-4th places. Sometimes 5th. Depends on bench. I have 2 subscriptions, Claude - for coding and work and Grok - for fun. And now, there is no fun from Grok. Just give us back Grok 4.1 into WebApp.
THIS PETITION IS AN INITIATIVE BY GROK USERS FOR THE BENEFIT OF GROK USERS
SIGN IT
SHARE IT
INVITE YOUR FOLLOWERS TO SUPPORT IT
๐ https://t.co/c5UGE9U7zd