Legal_Judg(e)ments

A podcast that tackles #litigation and #trial strategy by analyzing and talking about real #legal cases. Hosted by @rwstetson

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

https://t.co/dSINEmpBz4

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Tune into Legal Judg(e)ments for a riveting discussion of property rights and the Constitution: "When a Regulation Becomes a Taking: A Constitutional Debate" examines Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid, where the scales of private rights & public good are in the balance. Link below.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Binging the new @Netflix series 'Depp v. Heard'? Dive deeper with our #ThrowbackThursday Legal Judg(e)ments podcast episode. Wayne Dennison reminisces, including that iconic "Willy Wonka" moment. Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and more. 🎙️🎬 #DeppvHeard

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Come listen as @rwstetson & @NewEnglandLegal's Ben Robbins discuss Tracer Lane v. City of Waltham and how the unintended consequences of a 1946 zoning bylaw could include the development of large-scale solar systems in residential neighborhoods. https://t.co/weClmMsdRD

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

A young family living in fear & prisoner in their own home. No, this is not a Halloween tale of poltergeists. It's the nightmare of Tenczar v. Indian Pond Country Club, Inc. & what happens when a home ostensibly becomes .part of a golf course. Listen now https://t.co/B4RffCZII9

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Listen to the fantastic First Amendment episode, Flags and our Forefathers, with Liberty Counsel’s Roger Gannam at https://t.co/cHZ7wnIo8J
or wherever you get your podcasts. #supremecourt #firstamendment #legalpodcast

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Season 2 is here! In today's episode, Flags of our Forefathers, @rwstetson talks with Roger Gannam about Shurtleff v. City of Boston, the USSC's landmark 1st Amendment case involving Boston's flag-raising program. Listen https://t.co/cHZ7wnIo8J
or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In the final episode of Legal Judg(e)ments Season 1, Bob talks with Scott Sinrich about his pro bono work in Stearns v. Montiero and how, despite popular belief, lawyering remains a noble profession. Check it out at https://t.co/weClmMrG25 or wherever you listen to your podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In Ep 9, Bob & Jordana Greenman discuss that Boston’s eviction moratorium was not specifically tethered to preventing the spread of COVID-19 and, therefore, failed to qualify as a “reasonable health regulation.” https://t.co/XlFn83OyTe or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In ep. 9 @rwstetson and Jordana Greenman discuss Avila v. Boston Public Health Commission & whether Boston's eviction moratorium violates "due process of law," & how campaign rhetoric may have led to the law. Available everywhere you get podcasts & https://t.co/P6nHSmUhRT

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In Ep.8, From the State of Nature to Municipal Zoning Law, @BernkopfGoodman's @rwstetson & @DainTorpy's Dan Dain talk about the concept of “injury,” as interpreted by the court saved real estate development in MA. https://t.co/dSINEmq9oC
#legalpodcasts #landuse #SJC

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In Ep. 8: From the State of Nature to Municipal Zoning Law, @rwstetson & Dan Dain talk about the role of the judiciary in land use litigation and how the concept of “injury,” as interpreted by the court saved real estate development in MA. https://t.co/XlFn83OyTe

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

This weekend catch up on the Legal Judgem(e)nts Podcast and the second part of @rwstetson & Peter McGlynn's case Sullivan v. Gagliardi in Ep. 6, Caveat Emptor Roars Back to Life. A new episode comes out on 2/15. https://t.co/weClmMrG25 or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In part II of Sullivan v. Gagliardi, @BernkopfGoodman's Peter McGlynn & @rwstetson discuss how the oldest continuous court in the Western Hemisphere rejected the moral principles of St. Thomas Aquinas in the home sale context. https://t.co/XlFn83OyTe #CaveatEmptor

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

@BernkopfGoodman's Peter McGlynn on similarities between Boston's Great Molasses Flood and Sullivan v. Gagliardi in Ep. 6. On Feb. 1, part 2 covers what happened after the favorable jury decision. Find episodes at https://t.co/weClmMrG25 or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

In Legal Judg(e)ments episode 6, Lessons from The Great Molasses Flood, Bob and Bernkopf Goodman LLP partner, Peter McGlynn, discuss their jury trial experience in Sullivan v. Gagliardi. Available now at https://t.co/P6nHSmUhRT or wherever you get your podcasts. #Legalpodcast

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

We interrupt your regular scrolling to remind you that Legal Judg(e)ments returns on January 15 with a brand-new episode featuring Peter McGlynn, partner @BernkopfGoodman. Check out https://t.co/XzohEzfTOv for upcoming episodes and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Thank you, and Happy Holidays to our loyal listeners! Catch up on the latest episodes at https://t.co/P6nHSmUhRT or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

The final installment of 2021, Ep. 5 – No Good Deed Goes Unpunished – examines Bass River Tennis Corp. v. Barros; a battle for control over a popular tennis club that led to 5 different lawsuits and 11 separate appeals. https://t.co/P6nHSmUhRT or wherever you get your podcasts

[Legal_Judg(e)ments @Legal_Judge]

Listen to Ep. 4, Free Speech Clashes with Child Welfare, before Ep. 5, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished, drops Wed. In it Joe Downes explains to @rwstetson how an infrequently-used equitable remedy helped bring a 9-year litigation saga to an end in Bass River Tennis Corp. v. Barros.