If this was the tech the league was using, then I'd agree. This is fantastic work, and the league could learn something here. I don't have a problem with the call being it's a goal, it's just how they got to it that's irritating.
We've talked about it before - how much would a line 3 inches (the diameter of the puck) behind the goal line make reviews easier? Puck hits the second line and the goal counts.
This is the biggest head scratcher for me. How was this called a goal on the ice with no official having a clear sight of puck over the line. Can’t have this mistakes happen in playoffs
I thought it before the playoffs started. I hated to say it because with Florida out this year, you just never know how the playoffs will go. But, maybe this is the year they regroup, get a summer off and start fresh in September. And find a way to get rid of some problems...
"The issue I have with this is I don't understand how you can say that puck is completely crossing the goal line. There's no official behind the net there."
The Hockey Central Panel discusses the Game 4 OT winner in Anaheim
"It was awesome, the bulk of my career I played out of Mullet Arena, so to walk out that tunnel today was, it's a different animal."
Connor Ingram on his first playoff start as an Oilers goalie.
📹: @EdmontonOilers via Oilers+