@am_therebel@KoffiOffical@dohe78582@Athraons@GarbageHuman24 Race science wasn’t covered up you knob. It’s been disproven (ironically by the very scientists trying to find merit in it) and is no longer accepted as valid science. Btw still waiting on a citation dawg.
@andtam008@lporiginalg Yeah so there’s no “forward” or “backward.” Populations just exist and change. There is no finish line in societal evolution, much like physical evolution. We respond to pressures, and not always in the same ways.
@c1c2c3c4c@MichaelTLoPiano@lporiginalg Oh you mean when race scientists accidentally proved that there is no racial divide in intelligence and that races are purely social phenomena based entirely on superficial features?
@Surferonx777@Noahpinion I never said which is more common. Just that it is a symptom of capitalism. Always has been. It incentivizes the unfair distribution of resources in a society.
@jamalclovecraft@Smith_Everitt@decepticonaiden It’s not identical if they are using different words. If you asked one why, they would tell you the same thing lol. I’d quit trying to speak on stuff you have little experience with.
Can you tell me how many races there are?
@Smith_Everitt@decepticonaiden It’s not an exact science. Skull morphometrics is all about relational guesswork. You can determine “probable” info about a person based on the skull. But the only thing that can be determined with a good bit of accuracy is sex. And even then, dimorphism not 100% clear.
@mvp_0208 @post52001455065 @Armando543345@tylerduran21@davidchokboi Yes, this is correct. But we have to acknowledge that civilization is not a linear race with predetermined milestones. The wheel is great for those that decide to use it. Not using it doesn’t make a civ any lesser than a civ that does.