Yep
If tech showed a touch of a hair it should've shown the spike in the graph when it hit Vega's head
If you want to know why it did not, read my previous posts, it's all been decided already
A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.
Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.
He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.
This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.
But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.
IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!
Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.
But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).
Snicko shows one?
They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.
That would remove all doubt.
The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.
One last thing about this theater
These big organizations and people in charge are setting a super dangerous precedent
That is, robbery is allowed
Remember anon, monopoly on violence is what drives reality, if rules don't exist it's anybody's game
Tread carefully
Quickly read through the summary of today's game between portugal and Croatia, it's so obvious that they had push the por team through somehow
Yesterday I said that there's no scenario in which Cro advances, no matter how good they play
It's a simple as that, Occam's razor