🚨VEJA: Julia Zanatta expõe fotos de Xuxa usando a mesma tiara de flores: "Xuxa acha que a minha tiara é nazista. Ela só esqueceu de apagar as várias fotos em que aparece usando a mesma tiara"
Vídeo do Flávio no supermercado: 4.2M de views no Instagram em 12 horas MESMO SEM DIVULGAÇÃO DOS “INFLUENCIADORES” da direita.
INFLAÇÃO, VIOLÊNCIA E SAÚDE.
Foquem nos 3 e me agradeçam 01/01/2027.
Pessoal se os influencers descobrirem que vídeo assim da engajamento e likes a campanha do lula vai ter um grave problema então compartilhem, engajem, comentem e deem like nesse tipo de video onde voces virem porque isso vai dar incentivo a essa galera viciada em likes em fazer esse tipo de video. Espalhe entre as tias do zap a palavra.
GRAVE: PL pede investigação ao TSE sobre perfis com 30 seguidores que teriam gasto R$ 200 mil em anúncios contra Flávio Bolsonaro.
As contas fizeram grandes impulsionamentos na Meta. A campanha afirma ter identificado pagamentos em reais, dólares e pesos colombianos.
Muslims sources say that Mohammed’s child bride was still playing with dolls when he had sex with her.
She was 9. He was about 53.
Why does it matter that she was playing with dolls? Because there’s a rule in Islam that once a girl hits puberty she is not allowed to play with dolls as that is seen as idolatrous.
So, Mohammed didn’t just have sex with a young bride. He raped a child, a little girl because children cannot consent.
Mohammed was a pedophile. Confirmed by Islamic sources.
ATENTADO À DEMOCRACIA!
Denunciamos hoje ao TSE uma organização criminosa que financia uma rede fantasma de ataques contra a direita e o nosso pré-candidato, @FlavioBolsonaro.
Não são simples robôs: é uma estrutura profissional, com CPFs frios e impulsionamento milionário para manipular a opinião pública. Um verdadeiro canhão digital apontado contra nós.
A Justiça Eleitoral precisa agir. QUEM ESTÁ FINANCIANDO ESSE CRIME?
Não vão nos calar! 🇧🇷
Assista ao vídeo e compartilhe a verdade! #RogerioMarinho #FlavioBolsonaro
“Muhammad is prophesied in the Bible, he’s the Comforter Jesus promised.” I was taught that cold: the Paraclete of John 14:16 is Muhammad. Sounded airtight.
Read the very next line Jesus says. The Comforter isn’t a man coming later. It’s the Spirit coming in weeks.
It all fell apart the day I read the surrounding verses I’d been handed out of context.
Jesus defines the Comforter in the same breath: “the Helper, the HOLY SPIRIT, whom the Father will send in My name.” John 14:26. He names it. It’s the Spirit. Not a man.
And He keeps going. The Comforter “will be WITH you and will be IN you” (John 14:17), you can’t have a 7th-century Arabian prophet living INSIDE first-century disciples.
He says “you know Him, for He dwells with you”, present tense, already there. And “I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.” John 14:18.
Then it actually happens, fifty days later, at Pentecost. “They were all filled with the Holy Spirit.” Acts 2:4. Right on schedule. The Comforter came, exactly as described, in the lifetime of the men He promised it to.
The promise was fulfilled before any of them died.
It wasn’t a man arriving 600 years later and a thousand miles away.
It was God’s own Spirit, coming to live inside His people.
And He still does. That’s the gift.
A TikToker from England who spent years defending Islam to more than 100,000 followers is speaking out about his decision to follow Christ — describing the theological doubts, death threats from former supporters, and a series of vivid dreams involving Jesus that ultimately changed the course of his life. Before publicly embracing Christianity, Kieos had spent years creating Islamic content & defending Islam to an audience of more than 100,000 followers.
Kieos is clear that leaving Islam was not a sudden or dramatic departure. "It was definitely a slow, gradual process."
Then, a striking moment in Kieos' journey came. On three consecutive nights, he says he dreamed of Jesus — an experience he still finds difficult to fully explain.
"I never have dreams," he told Britannia Daily. He acknowledges the psychological interpretation but says it does not account for his specific circumstances. "People could argue that if I were looking at images of Jesus, they could be brought forward in my subconscious whilst sleeping. But I never did, which makes it strange."
FULL STORY: https://t.co/pxppEQ3Y3G
Em 1986, durante uma entrevista ao Roda Viva, Lula fez uma declaração que hoje merece ser revisitada. Questionado sobre países que não realizavam eleições livres, afirmou que “a eleição não é tudo”, dizendo que ela seria apenas “uma vírgula dentro de um sistema democrático” - declaração que provocou a indignação de Boris Casoy.
Quatro décadas depois, essa declaração parece dialogar com a trajetória política de Lula, que jamais escondeu sua admiração por diversas experiências socialistas na América Latina.
O caso mais emblemático é o da Nicarágua - Daniel Ortega “chegou ao poder pelo voto”, concentrou poder ao longo dos anos, desmontou os mecanismos de oposição, prendeu adversários, fechou veículos de imprensa e agora anunciou que o país simplesmente não realizará mais eleições - nem mesmo para fingir “democracia”.
Antes disso, repetiu a mesma retórica usada por inúmeros regimes autoritários; chamou seus opositores de “golpistas” e “traidores da pátria”.
O Brasil, evidentemente, não é a Nicarágua, mas é impossível ignorar que o país vive um processo de concentração de poder sem precedentes. Decisões do STF passaram a restringir a liberdade de expressão de opositores, ampliando a judicialização da política e fortalecendo um ativismo judicial que tem beneficiado sistematicamente o governo Lula. O resultado é um ambiente em que o debate político se torna cada vez mais limitado, enquanto as instituições deixam de ser vistas como árbitros imparciais para se tornarem protagonistas da disputa política.
Tudo isso não aconteceu por acaso - É resultado de um projeto político construído ao longo de décadas, de forma gradual, ocupando espaços estratégicos e ampliando sua influência sobre as estruturas do Estado.
O vídeo de 1986 não prova, por si só, que Lula pretendesse reproduzir o modelo adotado hoje por Ortega. Mas revela que sua visão sobre democracia sempre foi diferente da concepção liberal que coloca eleições livres, alternância de poder e limites institucionais como pilares inegociáveis.
Continuar ignorando os sinais deixados por Lula ao longo de décadas seria repetir um erro que outros países da América Latina já pagaram caro por cometer.
I always knew Joseph’s brothers threw him in a well. What I never noticed was HOW he gets out of it.
In the Quran, a caravan comes by, a man lowers his bucket for water, and he accidentally finds Joseph down there. They take him and sell him as goods. Surah 12:19.
So in the Quran, Joseph is basically FOUND. Discovered by strangers.
Then I read Genesis, and the brothers are far guiltier.
Reuben throws him in an empty pit, planning to rescue him later. But while Reuben’s away, Judah looks at a passing caravan of Ishmaelite traders and says: why kill him? Let’s SELL him. And they do. For twenty pieces of silver. Genesis 37:26-28.
The brothers don’t lose Joseph to a passing stranger. They traffic him. They pocket the silver. It’s cold, deliberate, and damning.
Here’s what I kept circling back to.
The Bible makes the brothers MORE guilty, not less. It names Reuben. Names Judah. Names the price. Names the buyers. It refuses to soften what they did.
That’s not a book protecting its heroes.
That’s a book telling the brutal truth.
And here’s the detail that wrecked me.
Twenty pieces of silver. A brother, sold for silver, by Judah.
Fast forward 1,700 years. Another descendant of Judah is betrayed and sold. For thirty pieces of silver. By a man named Judas, which is just the Greek form of Judah. Matthew 26:15.
The “sold for silver” detail… It’s a thread.
And the Quran’s version, where Joseph is just accidentally found, snaps that thread.
I used to say the Bible was the corrupted book.
But the Bible kept the silver, kept the betrayal, kept the guilt, because it was all pointing forward.
Joseph sold for silver, betrayed by his brothers, descending into a pit, rising to save the very ones who betrayed him.
That was always a portrait of Jesus.
The Bible kept every ugly detail because every detail was a signpost.
And they all pointed to the cross and crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
Ever wonder why no Arab country wants to take in Palestinians?
Because when Egypt did it, the Palestinians tried to overthrow the government and had to be expelled by the Egyptian military.
Because when Jordan did it, the Palestinians tried to overthrow the government and had to be expelled by the Jordanian military.
Because when Kuwait did it, the Palestinians tried to overthrow the government and had to be expelled by the Kuwaiti military.
That's why.
Please tell me again how Israel is the problem.