The current Joe Rogan pod is a must listen if you want to hear the inside scoop of corruption in the White House. @CalleyMeans bravely discloses how SuperPAC money has corrupted voter intent on health topics across the board, especially pesticides.
We need to think, deliberately and seriously, about the only possible means to amending our constitution — the convention. I discussed this on the #NCC podcast with the most prominent convention opponent, David Super: https://t.co/kczTj1QFCb
🇺🇸 Maine voted 75% to ban superPACs and the case is now one appeals ruling from a shot at the Supreme Court... the lawyer who argued down Trump's tariffs is carrying it
The target is a 2010 lower court decision called SpeechNow, which is what created superPACs two months after Citizens United, and that distinction is the whole case.
Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig says it lets the justices keep Citizens United intact and still kill unlimited money:
"You can say Citizens United was completely correctly decided, but nothing in Citizens United means we have to have superPACs."
Billionaires went from 0.3% of outside money in 2010 to 19% in 2024, and the first Trump voter Lessig met in Maine signed the petition and spent the day signing up every Trump voter who walked past, so if the First Circuit moves fast, 2028 could be the first election without them.
@WeTheBrandon
US Tech industry's coziness & alignment with Trump WH has the side effect of making countries not want to adopt American technology if they can avoid it. In other words, it surrenders soft power. Elon Musk is making the risks very clear https://t.co/GkVMelsfbK
Exactly right. Citizens United is the most misunderstood decision in SCT history. The mistake was SpeechNow. We're in the 1st Circuit to fix it, and end Super PACs. https://t.co/J4isN4yMxg
Musk's contribution is through his super PAC and has nothing to do with Citizens United, which was about people acting through corporations. Individuals have been able to spend unlimited money on independent ads since Buckley v. Valeo (1976), and via super PACs since SpeechNow v. FEC (2010).
Law folks: If you’re not using Claude Code or ChatGPT’s Codex, you have no idea what you’re missing. So I’m distributing my research tools that provide a huge boost to legal scholarship. Research assistance, cite-checking, proofreading, and more (thread):
https://t.co/iMq9KKGvE0
These guys — Nico Agosta and Daniel Lobo-Lewis of the Political Integrity Project — are my heroes. I was so happy to have them on our podcast, #AnotherWay. #EqualCitizens Watch and share!
https://t.co/GXc2a9s5oD