Le cancérologue Pr Joyeux alerte sur l'explosion des cancers chez les 25–35 ans.
Pourquoi des pathologies autrefois rares à ces âges deviennent-elles plus fréquentes depuis la mise en place de la vaccination anti-covid ? ⤵️⤵️
On May 21, a heated court hearing took place in Tokyo in a defamation lawsuit filed by prominent anti-Unification Church lawyer Masaki Kitō (Japan Federation of Bar Associations) against nonfiction writer Masumi Fukuda
concerning her book: "Sacrifice of the nation."
Today at noon thousands of red rose petals will flutter down through the oculus of the Pantheon in Rome. This spectacular tradition is held each year on the feast of Pentecost.
【A Serious Problem in Japan's Courts】
What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice has already condemned the defendant—before the case begins?
The dissolution of the Family Federation (formerly the Unification Church) is one of the most important religious freedom cases Japan has seen in decades.
One of the justices who will decide its future publicly criticized the group at a legal event, one year before she became a Supreme Court justice.
She shared the stage with lawyers from a left-wing legal network that has spent decades trying to bring the Family Federation down.
The seminar itself was built around condemning the group.
A judge's most essential duty is impartiality. Without it, there is no justice—only a verdict written in advance.
Japan has long been seen as a peaceful, law-abiding nation.
But beneath that image lies a different reality: even its highest court is no longer certain to deliver fairness.
À méditer : Vivre simplement, savourer le présent : le pêcheur mexicain l’a compris.
Le capitalisme lui dirait : travaille plus, accumule plus et oublie de vivre.
@monarchreport25#PersecutionReligieuse en #CoreeDuSud Comment appeler cela autrement ? Quand un gouvernement, qui honore habituellement ses aînés, en vient à limiter les soins médicaux pour détériorer la santé d'une octogénaire candidate au prix Nobel de la paix...
Detention of religious leaders continues in South Korea. Some are calling it a purge.
Among those detained, the most urgent concern is the health of Dr. Hak Ja Han, president of the Family Federation.
She fell three times in one month inside a detention center, and underwent surgery.
228 days since detention.
172 days in a cell.
56 days hospitalized.
Three surgeries.
Heart: she underwent surgery for cardiac arrhythmia before detention. Prosecutors detained her before recovery was complete.
Eyes: operated on amid risk of blindness from glaucoma and macular degeneration. The court granted three days of medical release. Guidelines recommend one to two weeks. The defense applied for an extension. Denied. She was returned to her cell.
Shoulder: she fell three times in one month inside detention. Pain spread through her body to the point where painkillers were no longer sufficient. The injury to her left shoulder was only discovered after her third temporary release, when she finally received a thorough examination at a hospital.
No adequate examination had been conducted inside the facility.
Her lawyer told the court: "It is too hard to endure each day. She does not even have the strength to chew rice."
The defense requested two months for rehabilitation. The court granted one. That deadline falls on May 30.
She and her defense team repeatedly raised alarms about her deteriorating health. Those warnings were dismissed.
She needed consistent nursing care and medical treatment. Inside the detention center, she received neither.
The neglect produced exactly what they warned against: further deterioration.
The world is watching South Korea detain religious leaders, deny them medical care, and call it justice. The question is no longer about law. It is about religious persecution and the abandonment of human rights
«Pourquoi les milliardaires, dont le métier est de faire des affaires, d'un seul coup se prennent de passion pour acheter TV, radios, journaux et instituts de sondages ? C'EST POUR MANIPULER LES #ÉLECTIONS ET EMPÊCHER LES 🇫🇷 DE DÉCIDER DE MANIÈRE ÉCLAIRÉE.» @f_asselineau#Frexit
Une pétition pour lutter contre l'invisibilisation de certains candidats par les médias mainstreams français, ici François Asselineau, qui brille par ses analyses.
--
Recevoir François Asselineau dans les médias - Signez la pétition : https://t.co/ErbSbtGqG8 via @ChangeFrance
Rev. Dunkley : Massimo clearly explains in this article why Dr. Han deserves the Nobel Peace Prize following her nomination by Dr. Jan Figel. Please take a moment to read and share.
Dr. Massimo Introvigne : My article in the Washington Times — why I support Dr. Jan Figel’s nomination of Mother Han for the Nobel Peace Prize.
https://t.co/yRgrXGX5ma…
#NobelForMotherOfPeace
#ReleaseTheMotherofPeace
Patricia Duval argues the dissolution of the Family Federation fails a core international law test.
She calls the order "a radical interference with believers' right to practice their religion freely."
Writing in Bitter Winter on April 22, 2026, she contends the ruling does not meet the "prescribed by law" requirement under Article 18.3 of the ICCPR.
【The International Standard】
The ICCPR and the 1985 Siracusa Principles require that restrictions on religious freedom rest on laws that are clear and predictable in application.
In Yurlov v. Russia, the UN Human Rights Committee struck down a vague Russian extremism statute on these grounds.
【Three Problems with Japan's Framework】
Article 81.1 of the Religious Corporations Act permits dissolution when a group substantially harms "public welfare," a term Japan has never defined.
The UN Human Rights Committee urged Japan to clarify the concept in 2008, 2014, and 2022. Tokyo has ignored each recommendation.
Japan's Supreme Court then ruled on March 3, 2025 that civil torts under Civil Code Article 709 qualify as "violations of laws and regulations."
That stretched the statute by importing an undefined category of "certain legal norms," when prior practice had limited the phrase to written statutory law.
【A Politically Driven Reinterpretation】
After the July 2022 assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, the government reversed its standing position in October 2022 and filed for dissolution. The Church could not have anticipated the shift.
【The Evidentiary Basis】
The 26 civil judgments underlying the dissolution relied on vague "social appropriateness" standards, addressed conduct from 30 to 40 years ago, and produced no new cases after the Church's 2009 compliance declaration.
The court cited a "risk" of future recurrence as justification.
Her conclusion: "The restriction on the right to freedom of religion imposed by the dissolution order cannot be considered to be prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 18.3 of the Covenant."
Source: https://t.co/cznZpT86Rs
"We were sanctioned based on nothing more than speculation."
On April 15th at Shinjuku Station, a second-generation member of the Family Federation spoke out for religious freedom.
He condemned the unjust ruling, noting it relied on mere "possibilities" rather than factual evidence.
Speech Excerpt:
Right now, here in Japan and across Asia, freedom of religion is under threat.
We have taken to the streets to raise our voices because we want to put a stop to this situation and protect this country.
To impose a penalty as severe as a dissolution order, there must be clear and definitive evidence.
However, all the evidence presented in court—at best—only suggested the possibility that illegal acts worthy of dissolution might be occurring.
It was nothing more than a possibility.
We were sanctioned based on nothing more than speculation.
Because of such ambiguous evidence, our organization, which once employed 2,000 people, is seeing its staff forced into dismissal or resignation.
If you include their families, 4,000 people will be left out on the streets.
While clear evidence is required to hand down such a heavy sentence, what we saw was nothing but ambiguity and conjecture.
The legal proceedings surrounding the dissolution order have been conducted as "non-contentious cases"—meaning they were held behind closed doors.
Taking advantage of this lack of public scrutiny, these proceedings have ignored the fundamental principles of the Japanese judiciary and violated the Constitution.
"I want everyone to know the truth about what has transpired in this trial. "
"I urge you to speak out—not just for us, but to safeguard the future of religious freedom in this country."
@NABISUB_PJ
https://t.co/km1ZiC0I8s
A Ryukoku University law professor warns Japan's Supreme Court that the Family Federation dissolution threatens every association in the country, not just one religious group.
Constitutional law professor Manabu Ishizaki @ishizakinyaoon of Ryukoku University filed a 29-page opinion with the Supreme Court.
He argues the Family Federation (formerly Unification Church) dissolution order strips believers of religious freedom and freedom of association.
The Ministry of Education's October 2025 liquidation guidelines promised religious freedom would be preserved.
Members have since been barred from their churches.
【Dissolution Restricts the "Right to Acquire Corporate Status"】
- Grounded in freedom of association (Art. 21-1) and religious freedom (Art. 20-1)
- Ishizaki frames it as tripartite: state, intermediate bodies (religious groups, NPOs, civic groups), and individuals
- Denying the right would collapse that structure and damage civil society
- The 1995 Aum Shinrikyo case assumed groups could survive without corporate status. In reality, revocation blocked facility ownership and outside transactions
【Illegality Cannot Be Established Through Speculation】
- The Family Federation has committed no criminal offense
- The Tokyo High Court treated the possibility the group "could" harm public welfare as "clear" danger
- The court acknowledged damages from alleged improper donations after the 2009 Compliance Declaration were "not necessarily clear"
- Ishizaki calls it a constitutional misinterpretation and a precedent that could extend to NPOs and civic groups
【Closed-Door Proceedings Violate the Constitution】
- The case is handled as "non-contentious," closed to the public
- Ishizaki argues it should be treated as litigation by nature
- The closed format violates Art. 82-1, which requires public trials
If the appeal succeeds, constitutional protection of corporate status would extend across Japanese civil society, not only religious groups.
Source : Sekai Nippo, April 18, 2026
https://t.co/3E5BG89rsN
Bien, puisque la presse-poubelle ne fera pas le travail, je recontextualise ce discours honteux avec le véritable passif de Macron en matière de nucléaire civil👇
❌ Mars 2017 : Engagement dans son programme présidentiel à réduire la part du nucléaire à 50 % d’ici 2025 et fermer Fessenheim.
❌ 10 juillet 2017 : Annonce par Hulot de la possible fermeture de 17 réacteurs d’ici 2025 pour atteindre 50 % de nucléaire.
❌ 27 novembre 2018 : Discours annonçant réduction à 50 % en 2035, fermeture de 14 réacteurs d’ici 2035 (4-6 avant 2030), et Fessenheim en 2020.
❌ 2019 : Annonce de fermeture de 12 réacteurs supplémentaires entre 2027-2035 (Bugey, Tricastin, etc.).
❌ 22 février 2020 : Arrêt du premier réacteur de Fessenheim.
❌ 29 juin 2020 : Arrêt du second réacteur de Fessenheim, fermeture complète de la centrale.
Voilà voilà… 👍
Le jour se lève ! C’est nous les gentils et on voit bien qui sont les méchants .
L’affaire Epstein montre un marais glauque où nagent des crocodiles :
les figures les plus puissantes du monde
Jaglang, ancien premier ministre travailliste de Norvège, ancien président du comité Nobel, ancien secrétaire général du conseil de l’Europe, s’est compromis avec Epstein et Bill Gates (qui rêvait du prix Nobel) .
https://t.co/WvX9b00GRo
Le patron de « Davos », le forum économique mondial, Brende, ex-ministre de Norvège qui est sous investigation.
Gates ne cesse de réclamer à Davos depuis dix ans la création de vaccins à procédure accélérée pour faire face à une épidémie terrible .Du coup, il a investi dans la fabrique des vaccins ARN et a gagné un milliard de dollars de plus.
Mme Juul, ambassadeur de Norvège à l’ONU, a vu ses enfants bénéficier d’un héritage massif d’Epstein, mais clame son innocence « Il y a quelque chose de pourri dans le Royaume de… Norvège » pour paraphraser Hamlet.
Le mélange Davos, Nobel, Gates, et Union européenne, plus plusieurs dirigeants de structures à vocation « humanitaire » dans ce marigot donne la nausée. »
Il n’y a pas de repas gratuit », écrivait Milton Friedman,et la notion de conflit d’intérêts semble avoir disparu.
@elonmusk@RobertkennedyJr@delbigtree
La crise covid, pour moi, a été le révélateur. Le harcèlement dont j’ai été l’objet sous la houlette d’un autre milliardaire lié à Epstein (Arnold, bien documenté par « science guardians») @SciGuardians pour contrôler ce que l’on a le droit de dire en science (à la suite des opérations de Epstein et du père Maxwell) montre l’ampleur du travail à faire pour que notre monde retrouve une conscience qui déterminera une confiance dans ses institutions.
https://t.co/Ib2HHJQZ3z
Le mot complotiste va devenir désuet devant l’ampleur du phénomène !
Pour une liste des personnalités actuellement touchées ou ayant démissionné ou étant poursuivies en lien avec Epstein files, il suffit d' interroger une des IA (la presse généraliste est avare!).
@ImpactMediaFR@wimocean Vous comprenez pourquoi ils refusent une enquête parlementaire sur l’affaire Epstein : la tête est pourrie
😝😨 18 mois de sursis probatoire pour un élu pédophile!
🚨 160 000 enfants subissent des agressions sexuelles chaque année en 🇫🇷
🧵👇 https://t.co/y5MILPOOmv
#Epstein