Genuinely would love to know how the fk Bailey smith is on more points at Half time than rowell considering smith is just about behind in every metric? Any explanations for that debacle?? #supercoach
So Baz having 10 touches at 70% with 3 clangers is 29 points but Rowell with 10 touches at 80% and 0 clangers is 22 points? Lmao yea sure it is #supercoach
So Baz having 10 touches at 70% with 3 clangers is 29 points but Rowell with 10 touches at 80% and 0 clangers is 22 points? Lmao yea sure it is #supercoach
callum mills last quarter
6 touches (2 contested)
1 contested mark
67% efficiency
0 turnovers
0 #supercoach points ????? π€π€£
All the experts out there who know it all, explain that one
@greenlitaccount people who are very known in this community, including previous winners have liked the post and dm'd me saying they agree but wont tweet it on their page as they dont want to come across the wrong way. Facts are many people are confused by this. Idiot, so hurtful π₯Ή
@JamesMunroTweet So its crystal clear to you how thats a -1 point quarter? That's awesome, care to give us and the community a breakdown of each stat and its point allocation to justify this end result? Seeing as you bother to play the game and understand it so well. Looking forward to it π
@ciccthecicc Pointing out glaring inconsistencies backed by the actual stats isnβt crying, its called observation and analysis. Just because youre used to accepting mediocrity doesnt mean everyone else will. If that rattles you, Fantasys not the solution, comprehension is lmao onya bike π
@samwitwickyaka justify mills' quarter being in the negatives whilst sheldrick 20% efficiency with his out on the full clangers getting him upscaled ladiesman217
@AaronAFLFantasy yea atleast u know whats what. In SC u see 2 players do the same thing, in the same context, and its scored completely different. Ive seen game winning goals be 50 points, ive also seen it be 14 points. ive seen 2 point tackles and also 6 point tackles. whole thing is a fkn joke.
@Darby62454165@tim_michell yea thats not on tim to explain. he isnt doing it himself. i would love one from whoevers in the know but we wont get one as you cant justify that
@jtsabs23 66 point quarter for 7d 4 contested at a good efficiency, 0 turnovers, had SI's and GA and 19 hitouts on top, that positive ratio from AF to SC in this context seems very realistic and fair. Its a lot of points but thats how rucks get awarded. thats not unusual. Fairs fair
@rmclaugh30 2 clangers doesnt take off enough points to wipe out this statline into the negatives, it simply doesnt. especially when other players who had less touches and much worse efficiency scoring 30 points more in the same quarter.