Maranda

ABOLITIONIST, not pro-life ❌ • Married to Shawn • Check my LinkTree 👇

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

Well that’s a blunder on your end. My question is simple and clear.
The question wasn’t about absolute certainty, it was could you be wrong about everything you claim to know? Your answer entailed yes because you appealed to your already admitted fallible reasoning.

Are you answering you cannot be wrong about everything you claim to know? You can go ahead answer that directly yes or no and then expand for clarity.

If you don’t answer directly, I’ll take that as a concession and move on.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose You just gave up knowledge. So any evidence or reasoning you couldn’t know to be true, yet here you are appealing to them, that’s a performative contradiction.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose I haven’t assumed your worldview so don’t assume mine.
Now, considering what you said could you be wrong about everything you claim to know under your worldview?

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Then answer my question instead of dodging? Can you or can you not verify your senses and reasoning are working properly outside of themselves? This is not a complicated question.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Have you ever done a basic class on metaphysics?

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

So… this is circular because we are talking about how you know what is real, and if your senses and reasoning are working properly to begin with but you’ve used both of those things in your explanation that makes it viciously circular. And I don’t know why you’re saying “we” appealing to the majority is fallacious and doesn’t resolve the issue in your worldview.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Another attempt at burden shift.

Even with others affirming. You’d still only know that it was the same through your own senses and reasoning. How do you know you are reasoning correctly to begin with?

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose You’ll be ok.

“Are you for real?”
How do you know what is real in your worldview?

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Hahahaaaaa you have nothing and you know it. I haven’t made any claims to need an argument for, you are the one who has made claims and have literally ZERO argument beyond your ai word vomit. 😂 Repent, and turn to Christ.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Hah nice try but you gave your method and even said it’s standard. Yet you have no argument motivating its validity. This is embarrassing for you. Why did you bring up the Bible when you don’t know what you’re talking about? 🤣😂😂

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Again what’s your argument that your I interpretative linguistic method is the one we ought use? Go ahead.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

I haven’t made a premise, I’m investigating the claims you made, now why because it’s standard ought we adhere to the method you’re using? I’m still not hearing an argument? Maybe you don’t know why you use this interpretation, and just grabbed the first one ai spit at you but you’re gonna need to give more substantive argument than what you are. Go ahead.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose And you can only do that using ai? 🤣

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose Cool, I’m gonna ignore your burden shift and ask again, what’s the argument we ought use your method?

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@Lor2ie @Shawn_Abolisher @LilaGraceRose What linguistic method are you operating under? And what’s the argument we also should use it?

[Shawn Grier @Shawn_Abolisher]

@LoverOfBooks123 @AbbyJohnson That’s literally what Mifepristone does and you guys love it

[Kayla Suderman @ksude7]

This was an important moment during the debate. It highlights how prolife organizations truly do not see prenatal children on equal footing with born children.

During the debate, @StudentsforLife for Life apologist @JojoRRuba brought up the scenario of a Texas father catching and killing Jesus Mora Flores in the rape of his 3 year old daughter. Under Texas self-defense law, the father was found not guilty since he was acting on behalf of the person needing life-saving help. Jojo posed the question that under abolitionist equal justice laws, would someone be justified in using lethal force against an abortionist to protect a baby from being killed. When @JacobMillerAHA answered that would logically be justified on behalf of a defenseless prenatal child, Jojo was incredulous.

Keep in mind how many times Jojo said the word "PERSON" in reference to a victim of violence as he read the Texas law, and yet his conclusion is that someone paid to murder a prenatal victim should not expect their own life to be in danger under self-defense principles. So much for pro-life personhood recognition...

When pro-life leaders like Jojo say they are also abolitionists and want protection for the unborn, don't believe them. At every twist and turn, they recoil at the idea of equal justice under homicide law for prenatal children. They don't want their mothers held accountable for malice aforethought, and now they don't want hired assassins to face intervention from good Samaritans. In the eyes of these pro-life influencers, those special rights are apparently conferred at birth.

Abortion is premeditated murder. And only abolitionists are proposing bills that recognize it as such. It's not radical to want to equally protect their lives. What IS radical is saying you want to protect them, and then refusing basic protections for their lives, even self-defense on their behalf.

[Maranda @Liberty4PreBorn]

@CriticalDragon1 @Shawn_Abolisher You’re assuming the argument behind posting the pictures, the images are for awareness. I feel like anyone who reads “the world wants to keep this hidden” would pretty obviously conclude that. 🤣