LibertyCipher

Christian, Husband, Dad, Son, Biblical Zionist, American Nationalist.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

You have articulated exactly the mind of the majority Republicans in the house and Senate.

They all follow the same school of thought the liberal media was pushing hard in the early 2000s, that we need to accept some of the left's platform if we want to win, because that makes you "moderate" and "moderate" is what the voters want.

This appeal to "moderation_ is nothing more than an attempt by the left and the media to dissuade Republicans against pushing back against their proto-marxist-esque agenda.

You will notice that the appeals to "moderation" only work in favor of the Democrats. The ones who are the loudest proponents of "moderation" rarely if ever use it to push Democrats into adopting smaller government, free markets, individual liberty, lower taxes, constitional originalism, the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and uninfringed gun ownership.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@DadWins_ Ephesians 2:8-9, KJV):
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”

Book of Mormon (2 Nephi 25:23):
“for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.”

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@DadWins_ Nothing in the new testament contradicts the old testament or the other books of the new testament.

The writings of Joseph Smith do.

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

10 years. 10 years. I’ve listened to every Dem & never Trump pundit call Trump, Elon and anyone else who voted Republican a Nazi. And now they line up behind Platner, with an actual Nazi tattoo. Unbelievable.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@grok
The system intentionally destroys the chain of custody. Demanding "pictures or a bawdy note" as proof is circular and illogical the statute guarantees you can never have that evidence.

That's the point Trump and others have made for years. The vulnerability is the proof that large-scale undetectable fraud is possible.

Dismissing it because "you have nothing" ignores the built-in blind spot the law created.

Care to address California's statute, or just keep posting memes?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@CBJMAD @DougieCUSA @BuzzPatterson @grok Where is the logical flaw?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

Can't you read? No one can provide evidence because the process makes it completely impossible to detect or dismiss evidence due to the way California handles envelope to ballot relationships. They could create a provable relationship between ballots and envelopes without breaking anonymity, they just choose not to.

Probability of Raman getting more votes than Bass but only in the late mail in indicates the possibility of irregularities.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@grok CA Elections Code §15360 only requires a 1% tally audit of already-accepted ballots. There's no physical possibility for re-verification of signatures after envelope extraction (under the asserted intent of voter privacy).

The rushed initial signature check is the only gatekeeper. Any forgery that slips through is permanently untraceable. This built-in blind spot makes large-scale mail-in fraud impossible to detect or disprove, exactly as Trump warned for years.

The media calling it “baseless” lied by ignoring the statute itself. The vulnerabilities are real regardless of how hard the media gaslights the people.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

CA Elections Code §15360 only requires a 1% tally audit of already-accepted ballots. There's no physical possibility to re-verify signatures after envelope extraction. The rushed initial signature check is the only gatekeeper. Any forgery that slips through is permanently untraceable.

This built-in blind spot makes large-scale mail-in fraud impossible to detect or disprove, exactly as Trump warned for years.

The Media calling it “baseless” and stating there's no evidence (they know evidence is intentionally impossible to verify due to the nature of California policies) lied by ignoring the statute itself.

The vulnerability is real. Fix it. No more gaslighting.

[🇺🇸 Edward T. Winslow @EdwardTWinz]

🚨 🚨 KRISTEN WELKER HAS 3 OPTIONS AFTER TRUMP WALKED OFF HER INTERVIEW. ALL 3 ARE CATASTROPHIC FOR THE MEDIA.

This is the moment nobody wants to talk about.

After nine years of rallies, press conferences, and taped sit-downs → the press is now boxed into THREE choices every time Trump sits across from them. And every single one is a nightmare:

⚠️ OPTION 1: KEEP PRESSING FOR EVIDENCE
– Trump says "All I have to do is look. I listen to people"
– Anchor demands court-level sourcing
– Trump calls them crooked and walks off
– The clip goes viral with Trump as the decisive one and the anchor as the aggressor
– Network spent the travel budget to Wisconsin for a segment that ends in 90 seconds

⚠️ OPTION 2: ACCEPT THE FRAME AND MOVE ON
– Don't challenge the California election claims
– Don't push back on "five days and no winner"
– Let "dirty election" stand without a follow-up
– Audience sees the network validating the narrative
– Every future anchor gets the same treatment because it worked

⚠️ OPTION 3: DON'T TAKE THE INTERVIEW
– Refuse the sit-down entirely
– Trump holds rallies, posts on Truth Social, sets the agenda anyway
– Network loses access, loses the clip, loses the audience
– "We travelled all the way to Wisconsin" becomes impossible to say
– The story becomes "media too afraid to interview the president"

Let that sink in.

There is no Option 4. There is no clean exit. There is no "we ask the right question and he answers it."

The media is showing you a president who got "a little bit angry" in the rain and walked off a barn-roof interview in Chippewa Falls.

They're NOT showing you that every path forward for the press leads to the same outcome — Trump controls the frame, the clip, and the story.

This is the most structurally difficult position any White House press corps has faced since the invention of the televised interview.

I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@grok @EdwardTWinz @grok
Sure... CA mail ballots verify signatures but NO audit of ACCEPTED ones, only rejects. If a darvester forges signatures, and it passed liberal review it's accepted/separated/counted.

Do you not acknowledge this exact vulnerability?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@EdwardTWinz @grok In California, the only required post-election audit is a 1% ballot tabulation check. No sampling or re-verification of signatures on accepted mail envelopes once staff separates the ballot.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@EdwardTWinz The process is the evidence!

Of course, since the only thing you can audit are the ballots, not the envelopes, there's nothing you can do than recount the ballots.

No audit except on tabulation means there's no way to produce provable fraud.

The system is intentional.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@DadWins_ Where in the Tanakh (old testament) is this "book of Moses?"

If everything you say isn't in the Bible, then how do you feel confident in claiming Mormons follow Jesus in The Way as Christians do?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

God intentionally formed humanity from dust (science confirms everything on this planet was made from dust) to display both our total dependence on Him and His personal care, while the Flood was righteous judgment on a world “only evil continually,” paired with unmerited grace in saving Noah. These details are not primitive or immoral but deliberate revelations of God’s holiness, human guilt, and redemptive mercy.

Surface-level criticisms that call them “stupid” simply omit this explicit biblical context.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@PhysicistTx @CorruptMM The wages of all sin is death. The original sin was dishonoring The Father, and as a result, we all die.

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@DadWins_ @collinwood_j You never responded to my follow up question. https://t.co/ro3kU8XkHs

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

The Bible says Jesus was foreknown before the foundation of the world and that the plan of salvation was set long ago (1 Peter 1:20; Ephesians 1:4; Revelation 13:8). Where in Scripture does it describe a premortal council in heaven where spirit children chose between Jesus and Lucifer to be our Savior?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

Righteous judgment speaks truth in love (Ephesians 4:15) and defends the oppressed. This means evaluating according to God’s Word with truth, without hypocrisy, partiality, or false witness. It protects the vulnerable.

Are you judging me as someone who bears false witness? Or are you judging me as someone who pointed out an uncomfortable truth?

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@collinwood_j @DadWins_ I guess not "every" question. 🤷‍♂️

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@C8Luna @whisperjam33 @TPUSA 1 timotht 4:7 "Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives’ tales; rather, train yourself to be godly."

[LibertyCipher @LibertyCipher]

@BlueLikeTahoe2 @ExPostMedia @Timcast Oh look, a leftist who can't talk without using explitives and can't decide if the right-wing are a bunch of zionists or a bunch of Nazis, but is certain either way that anyone to the right of chairman Mao is evil.