@HunterBoone@KnightingUp@nytimes You continue posting a late night comedian as proof. Late night comedy isn't a reliable source. Additionally, the whole excuse for them not being held accountable is that they claim they are comedy and don't need to be truthful, you can't have it both ways.
@walsh_packard@LevelOneRaccoon@KJVPopulist The PIT maneuver is controlled, the driver is the one uncontrolled. There is a higher likelihood that the driver hurts bystanders than the PIT maneuver harming bystanders.
@GavynnnOrig@lamps_apple That is irrelevant. When she said he "raped" her and he called her a liar, he was actually correct. By the definition in effect it wasn't rape. Therefore it isn't defamation since he was saying the truth.
@karmawi11getyou@sparticus676 They said that rape was not proven. Either your definition is wrong or they weren't convinced that what you are saying happened actually happened. Either way rape was not proven, which is the claim above.
@AltDicta@HabCorpLinguist Reagan had to compromise for a moderate just because the Democrats had a majority and tanked his nominee. Here the Republicans had a majority and was close to an election. When LBJ tried nominating someone and the Democrats had the majority it was still blocked.
@AltDicta@HabCorpLinguist You're right on these points. I am pointing out that a lot has changed and goodwill was lost, especially given how the Democrats treated those nominees. Additionally, given the unofficial rule of not confirming federal judges in an election year the Republicans demanded more.
@AltDicta@HabCorpLinguist Since Thomas there was no confirmed supreme court justice where the president and Senate majority were from the opposite party. Garland was the only attempt since then, and might have been retaliation for Bork and Thomas. Additionally, they were following the Thumond rule.
@MTubbs30@washghost1 Are you willing to not sue if you are hit by a drunk driver while walking because you could have been more careful and worn a blow up ball around you to cushion you in the case of an accident?
@PolicyProtest@TheOmniLiberal Socialism is not about if they theoretically deserve it, it is actively giving away from yours to others. Therefore, his example of sharing toys is fair. Now ask a kid to share a snack they saved with a kid who finished their own snack immediately. This is an even better example.
@mjfree You're close but a slight correction. Republicans can LEGALLY redistrict and Democrats can't ILLEGALLY redistrict. There you go, I corrected it for you!!!
@LanceSBH84@Z_XSophie Still not a Nazi. While this guy is sympathetic to terrorists and their affiliates who actually want to kill the Jews. You tell me whose ideas are more similar to nazism.
@muhammadshehad2 Therefore Palestinians have no right to attack Israel to try and get more territory. The whole history of the conflict is Israel taking what they are given and the Arabs attacking them and trying to take land by force.