LilithMichelle

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@theblackvault @OSIRISUAP you could even lift a (small) rocket to high altitude and put anything into orbit that way.
just saying

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@theblackvault @OSIRISUAP lighter than air applications are all classified anyway,
so of course it worth digging.
Supposedly "ballons" are the best/cheapest way to
lift heavy weights over long distance.
Yet wedon't see any commercial application !

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

neutrinos and many others things can just go through matter,

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

#UAPx
Perhaps it is less discussed, but uap going through matter (ground) is not uncommon in the litterature.
maybe it can justt go hrough anything.
(more than trans"medium").

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@Myst_Planet obviously someone did put the "cradle", manipulating the object, but they can't secure the lift off ?

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@RAEFOSnet And if it s 'still "alive", would you link it to a helicopter ?

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@RAEFOSnet even rubble/trash is lifted with more precaution

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@RAEFOSnet since when you lift (rolling) stuff up
with nobody on the ground?

whatare the chance the tning falls in mid air, crash in the country side ? (expecially if it s radioactive).

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@RAEFOSnet wtf is that ?

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@lindsay_dm @RiotSeeds it has always been shamanic/hyptonic/trance in nature.
even in the solid nuts and bolts case, with physical ground traces... there s always a magical elment to it, something that doesn't fit right.

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@lindsay_dm @RiotSeeds That is perhaps why so many people are linking it
to consciousness...

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@lindsay_dm @RiotSeeds the content of reported "close contacts" are very close to hyptonic trance in their content and description, from the begining (1950s).

Not even talking about hyptonic regression,
there has always been a "magical" /dream like tone to it.

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@Myst_Planet @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp if there is a solid object to begin with.
even that is not certain

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@Myst_Planet @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp problem is we don't even know what we are looking at.
Is it some kind of optical (IR) camo,
distortion created by ? or blur ? plasma ?
reflection? partial reflection/absortion, dynamic ?

The real shape of object cannot be defined
in most of the ufo pictures..

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@ra_ma128 what if we discover "life forms" in space tomorrow ?
how silly will our rockets looks compared to stuff that just live in the space ?

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@ra_ma128 perhaps there are other form of "knowledge" of evolution,expansion than science and technics.

i don't know, but stop judging everything from science.
Any living thing is 10x superior than our best computer or gadget.

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@ra_ma128 you can't look at everything from a technological
point of view.
Biology or nature are far more complex than our "tech".
but everyone judge everything from technology/science/progress standpoint

it s a tiny bit of reality,just like visible light is a tiny bit
of reality.

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@AlchemyAmerican @rosscoulthart lightspeed is tostay polite, otherwise you just warp...yunno

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@AlchemyAmerican @rosscoulthart civilians "touched" craft back in the 50s... and saw the people/bots/ai.... commonpplbackin50/60/70s
wtf is that? controlled disclosure ?

Like the military has any tools or mindset to handle it,except cranes, if any things happens to be physical

[LilithMichelle @LilithM77]

@JonMajerowski where ?