Elon Musk just put a price tag on obedience. It costs $200,000.
Musk: “You don’t need college to learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free.”
Every lecture. Every textbook. Every framework ever written. Free on any screen in any country right now. The entire knowledge monopoly collapsed in a decade. Nobody updated the price tag.
Musk: “Colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they’re not for learning.”
Strip the ivy and the branding. What’s underneath is a four-year obedience trial. Can this person follow instructions on a schedule without asking why.
Musk: “There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework assignments.”
That is the entire six-figure value proposition. Not what you know. Not what you can build. Whether you can be managed. The establishment doesn’t need you educated. It needs you domesticated.
Musk: “If you’re trying to do something exceptional, you must have evidence of exceptional ability. I don’t consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability.”
The system doesn’t produce exceptional. It produces manageable. It takes the most creative years of your life and teaches you to wait for instructions. That is not education. That is containment.
Musk: “Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs is pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out.”
They didn’t leave because they couldn’t keep up. They left because the ceiling was underground.
8 billion people now carry the same library in their pocket. The one these institutions charged a lifetime of debt to access.
The only product the university still sells is the belief that you need one.
"Money doesn't have power in & of itself. People get confused sometimes they think an economy is money. Money is a database for exchange of goods & services. The actual economy is goods & services"
一 Elon Musk
Elon Musk just put the entire university system on trial.
Not the curriculum. Not the professors. The premise.
Musk: “You don’t need college to learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free.”
For a thousand years, universities held one monopoly. Access. You paid the toll or you stayed ignorant.
The internet erased that in a decade.
Every lecture. Every framework. Every textbook. Free. From any screen on Earth.
The six-figure tuition is no longer buying knowledge. It is buying a signal.
Musk: “There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework assignments.”
That is the product. Not intelligence. Not creativity. Not vision. Compliance.
You are paying $200,000 to prove you can tolerate bureaucracy on a schedule.
Musk: “Colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they’re not for learning.”
The entire system is a sorting machine for corporate HR. It does not measure what you can build. It measures whether you can sit still, follow directions, and deliver on command.
Four years of obedience dressed as education.
Musk: “If you’re trying to do something exceptional, you must have evidence of exceptional ability. I don’t consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability.”
The system optimizes for average. It rewards the compliant. It certifies the patient. It quietly filters out everyone who refuses to wait for permission.
The ones who reshaped the modern world never finished the test.
Musk: “Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs is pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out.”
They did not drop out because it was too hard. They dropped out because the speed limit was too low.
The most dangerous thing a university does is convince a generational talent that finishing the syllabus is the achievement.
It is not. It is the floor.
A degree is a receipt for compliance. The future has never belonged to people who finish their homework.
Sanders et AOC veulent geler la construction de tous les data centers IA aux États-Unis.
Il faut comprendre ce qui se passe vraiment. Ce n'est pas une bataille politique parmi d'autres. C'est la dernière convulsion d'une vision du monde qui a compris, inconsciemment, qu'elle est condamnée.
Le socialisme n'est pas une théorie économique. C'est une structure morale qui a besoin de trois choses pour exister :
1. De la rareté à redistribuer
2. Des victimes à défendre
3. Une classe d'intermédiaires pour orchestrer le tout
Retirez un seul de ces trois piliers et l'édifice s'effondre. L'IA est en train de retirer les trois en même temps.
La rareté d'abord. Pendant 200 ans, l'économie politique a tourné autour d'une question : comment répartir une production limitée ? Marx, Keynes, Piketty — tous bâtissent sur ce postulat. Mais l'IA inverse l'équation. Le coût marginal de l'intelligence tend vers zéro. La production de logiciel, de design, d'analyse, de code, bientôt de matière manufacturée par robotique avancée — tout cela devient quasi-gratuit. Dans un monde d'abondance, la question "qui mérite quoi" perd son sens. Il n'y a plus rien à arbitrer.
Les victimes ensuite. L'IA est le plus grand égalisateur d'accès au savoir et aux compétences de l'histoire humaine. Un gamin au fin fond du Bangladesh a aujourd'hui accès au même tuteur que l'héritier d'une famille new-yorkaise. Un développeur solo produit ce qu'une équipe de 20 produisait il y a trois ans. Les barrières s'effondrent. Or sans victimes structurelles, plus de cause à défendre, plus de mandat moral à exercer.
Les intermédiaires enfin. C'est le point le plus douloureux pour eux. Le socialisme a toujours eu besoin d'une caste : journalistes-militants, fonctionnaires-experts, ONG-prescriptrices, politiques-redistributeurs. Cette caste vit du fait qu'elle prétend traduire la réalité aux masses. L'IA rend cette traduction obsolète. Tout le monde peut interroger directement la source, vérifier un chiffre, comparer des modèles, simuler une politique publique. Le monopole de l'interprétation est mort.
Voilà pourquoi je dis que l'IA est un catalyseur de vérité. Elle ne crée pas la vérité — elle la rend ininterprétable. Les systèmes qui produisent de la valeur deviennent visibles. Ceux qui en captent sans en produire deviennent visibles aussi. Le voile tombe.
Et c'est ça qui est insupportable. Pas la perte de pouvoir — la perte de sens. Réaliser que ta vision du monde, ton militantisme, ta carrière entière reposaient sur un édifice qui ne tenait que par la rareté et l'opacité. C'est une blessure narcissique d'une profondeur abyssale.
La réaction est mécanique : il faut bloquer le catalyseur. Pas pour des raisons rationnelles (l'argument "énergie" est risible quand on voit leurs positions sur le nucléaire). Pour des raisons existentielles. Il faut empêcher l'avenir d'advenir, parce que l'avenir les efface.
300 lois locales. Un moratoire fédéral. Des moratoires européens (AI Act). Tout le pattern est le même partout : freiner, ralentir, encadrer, taxer. Pas réguler intelligemment — paralyser.
Mais ils ont déjà perdu. Et au fond d'eux, ils le savent. La Chine ne s'arrêtera pas. Les Émirats ne s'arrêteront pas. L'Inde, Singapour, l'Argentine de Milei, certains États américains — personne ne s'arrêtera. Bloquer la construction de data centers à San Francisco ne fait que déplacer le centre de gravité. Le seul effet net est d'appauvrir ceux qu'ils prétendent défendre.
C'est le rebond du chat mort. Un dernier sursaut avant l'immobilité définitive.
PS : tout n'est pas perdu pour eux. La porte est ouverte. Il suffit de comprendre que créer de la valeur est plus gratifiant que la redistribuer, que construire est plus puissant que dénoncer, et que l'entrepreneuriat est la seule forme contemporaine d'action politique qui change réellement le monde. La reconversion est possible. Elle commence par accepter une chose simple : personne n'a besoin de toi pour être sauvé. Mais beaucoup de gens ont besoin de toi pour construire.
Andrew Tate goes off on men who accept a boring average life:
“I have f*cked women you will never f*ck, I drive cars you’ll never drive, I go places you’ll never go earning sums you’re never gonna f*cking make.
The difference between you and I is that I would rather die than live any other way”
@TranDongDu13 đồng ý với chủ thớt.. thiệt .. chỗ mình làm có chương trình đọc sách .. má .. nó chọn sách thằng tony .. mình có hỏi tụi nó tony là ai .. tụi nó ko ai trả lời ..
Kick streamer wvagabond (aka Captain Crack Sparrow) was the first tourist to livestream IRL from Antarctica using his own Starlink setup.
He pulled it off briefly on land, but back on the ship, crew swarmed him mid-stream, confiscated the Starlink dish, citing vessel policies, security rules, and Antarctic treaty bans on personal satellite gear.
What don't they want people to see?
Source: @DissidentMedia, @Starlink
Elon Musk: I think probably the biggest danger of AI and robotics going wrong is government
People who are opposed to or worried about corporations should really worry most about government
Government is just a corporation in the limit, it is the biggest corporation with a monopoly on violence
I always find it a strange dichotomy where people would think corporations are bad, but the government is good, when the government is simply the biggest and worst corporation
The government could potentially use AI and robotics to suppress the population that’s a serious concern
"Does anyone else feel like they're just too aware of everything?"
"Money is literally just paper that someone decided is valuable, and we all just agreed."
"I find it fascinating to watch people rushing through their day, stressed about deadlines and status and possessions, completely unaware that they're playing a game they never chose to join."
"They're so caught up in the matrix of social constructs, they never question any of it."
"But once you see it, you can't unsee it."
Muốn giỏi đầu tư không nhất thiết phải
xem những thứ trực tiếp nói về đầu tư.
Tốn 36 phút cho 1 video có thể thay đổi tư duy sẽ rất khác so với tốn 36 phút cho 36 clip vô nghĩa.
(video có sẵn vietsub)
Feynman là một thiên tài vật lý. Đoạn phỏng vấn 36 phút này là "cả tấn" tư duy, cách ông áp dụng để tìm ra những điều mà người khác không nhận thấy.
Rõ ràng, nó là món tư duy bạn có thể áp dụng cho mọi thứ trên đời chứ không chỉ đầu tư.
Một tư duy cơ bản nhất trong video này là việc:
"Hiểu" chứ không phải "Biết".
Ngoài ra, có rất nhiều những thứ rời rạc nhưng cốt lõi để xây dựng tư duy đánh giá mọi thứ.
Nhưng nếu biết cách kết nối những dòng suy nghĩ đó lại, bạn sẽ thấy một sự khác biệt lớn trong tư duy của bạn sắp tới. Đó cũng là điều mà Feynman đang muốn truyền tải:
Mọi thứ không phức tạp, không khó, chỉ là có rất nhiều thứ cần "thu thập" để kết nối lại với nhau.
Hãy xem video này với một trạng thái luôn tìm cách liên tưởng tới việc đầu tư, đối chiếu với cách thị trường vận hành.
Mình chắc chắn bạn sẽ phải "wow" khá nhiều lần.
Hãy SAVE và XEM ĐI XEM LẠI.