Posting daily true/false questions relating to undergraduate linear algebra. Please comment proofs/counterexamples. Link below for question and solution bank.
This is a tough one for my students but if w were in fact a LC of u and v then c1u+c2v-w=0 for some weights c1 and c2 and thus the set {u, v, w} must be dependent. Are my followers familiar with contrapositive arguments?
This is true because if the cols are LI (call them a1, …, an) then the only solution to
c1a1+…+cnan=0
Is the trivial one (this is the textbook definition of LI)
And so Ax=0 has only the trivial solution x=0.
This is true because the range of the transformation is nothing but all of the linear combinations of the columns of A, all of which are vectors in R^m.