@emollick because if not, and this lazy writing curse breaks, then we ARE finally about to enter the stage that gets things to be weird beyond recognizable “normal technology”
@emollick In fiction, the part where everything built-up so far finally crescendoed in full-on bananas gets so often undercut, canceled or time-skipped over, happens off-camera and whatnot; that I can’t help but expect this USA vs Anthropic drama to be that thing that hard stops the ride.
@reach_vb please tell your guys to fix this annoying issue that appshots could land in a new thread, even if you’ve already pasted a few in an ongoing one!!! not only that, I have had a long dictation running, that just got annihilated no record left after this appshot-forced thread switch
@scrollvoid@jachiam0@AmandaAskell@TheZvi saying ‘net culture’ at the end, he says binary is what’s left at each company once you subtract the other view’s cultural volume; which implies both views are present within the two companies, yet one is prevalent in each
It's actually not a binary; these aren't mutually exclusive, nor are they requisite. You can vote both, you can vote neither. But it is a divergence in the worldviews between the orgs. It's complicated to describe "the worldview of an org" because orgs are composed of individuals with a range of views, but there is a kind of net culture and this is an attempt to describe it.
@simpsoka yet a great designer will get me a nice design unprompted, too. they will know to inspect the product themselves and then how to extract its essence to embody it in design that makes users feel things and be guided.
5.5 lacks theory of mind this advanced
@AedmarSkyjarn@reach_vb me toooo, omg such a relief to find out I wasn't the only one. I was already confused all right, but getting the appeal denied was way worse. I never would have known this was happening to everyone if not for this post
@simpsoka papercut report: when user runs out of quota, codex still proceeds to work for a while, but the agent that lives in ‘approve for me’ (ex. ‘auto-review’) gets cut off immediately. this causes the main agent to get in an auto-review decline loop, and it pollutes the thread. 🦔help
@UN_Goes_Here@JimmyWuReal@datacurve@winkey_h the point is people giving a quick glance perceive whatever is in the top right corner as the best, so graph is mirrored to reflect that
@southpolesteve every new compaction grows in size by (0.3+0.04n)Mb, n=60 compactions is already 2Gb total, and then it goes crazy and 70 jumps to 3Gb; and as far as I figured deleting all of them but last two doesn’t cause much degradation yet does revive the thread. codex needs a push to do it