From now on I’m blocking all of you niggers and liberal faggots to save myself the brain aneurism of going back and forth about basic reality for 4-5 hours at a time.
You failed abortions are so retarded it’s almost creative the shit you come up with. I simply don’t have the time to argue with you about how black people are geniuses and how communism is a great idea. Most of you aren’t even real people with fake bot accounts.
You’ll get hit with the cold hard data and memes and then I’m out, I’m busy making more money than you and enjoying my life while you seethe on Twitter all day.
@auxonblood@skaldsyn98@kfafafagga67kfc@ctrlvolk If you were right next to him and he let out a giant fart you would literally deep inhale it lmfao. Your entire account is literally dedicated to sucking his brown little cock
@skaldsyn98@auxonblood@kfafafagga67kfc@ctrlvolk Bro you are guys are a fucking faggots that get ratioed everywhere outside of your little fag groyper account echo chambers lmfao, is having sex with women gay? Yes or no.
@auxonblood@kfafafagga67kfc@ctrlvolk Working is serfdom lmfao, so what do you do? Sell your twink ass on the street? Sooner or later mom and dad will kick you out of the house
@browneyeslayer3@kfafafagga67kfc@ctrlvolk Working makes you a fucking idiot lmfao, hey is having sex with women gay too? Fucking faggot. Go ask mommy for some more money
“Your immigration paragraph has nothing to do with whether race causes crime. Black voting patterns → genetic criminality? You just changed subjects.”
It has everything to do with overall group impact. Blacks vote in large majorities for more low-skill third-world immigration that directly competes with them for jobs, housing, and schools, then complain about the results. That’s not “genetic criminality,” it’s lower average cognitive ability + higher time preference + cultural patterns showing up in political behavior the same way they show up in crime, single motherhood, and educational outcomes. Group differences don’t stop at homicide rates. You calling it a subject change is you pretending only one narrow metric is allowed to matter.
“Posting 500 riot videos still does not solve your denominator problem. 500 videos are 500 videos. How many unique people… Out of how many Black Americans? That’s what population prevalence means. You can spam anecdotes until tomorrow and still never answer that.”
The official data already answered the prevalence question decades ago. FBI, NCVS, CDC — Blacks are massively overrepresented in violent crime relative to population share, year after year. The videos aren’t the proof; they’re the illustration of what that overrepresentation looks like in practice: coordinated looting, flash mobs, and open tolerance for disorder that the stats capture in the aggregate. You keep demanding a unique-person count from videos while ignoring the arrest, offender, and victimization data that already give the rates. That’s not a serious objection.
“They weren’t prosecuted so Black crime is probably worse.” / “Not prosecuted does not mean the crime wasn’t recorded… unidentified offender does not magically become Black…”
Clearance rates for homicide are consistently lower when the victim is Black, especially in high-Black neighborhoods. That’s not because the crimes vanish from the stats — the bodies are counted. It’s because witness non-cooperation (“no snitching”) is more common in those communities, so fewer cases get solved. Lower clearance means more free offenders cycling back into the same pools.
Unidentified offenders in Black areas are not randomly distributed; they track the same demographic pattern as the known ones. The disparity in the solved cases is already enormous. Under-prosecution and low clearance make the real-world impact worse, not better for your argument.
“Half of murders are unsolved.” / “Unsolved does not mean unreported… You’re confusing the clearance rate with whether the crime was counted at all.”
Correct that murders get counted even when unsolved. You’re still missing the point. In cities and neighborhoods with high Black populations, clearance is often abysmal precisely because of the culture of non-cooperation. That leaves more killers on the street. The known offender data already shows the huge racial disparity. The unsolved portion doesn’t reverse it — it sits on top of it. You don’t get to treat low clearance as evidence that the disparity is overstated when the victimization and arrest data line up the same way.
The white supremacist flyer example / “3 groups → 92% of 7,567 incidents… thousands of visible incidents can come from a tiny number of people… Changing flyers into murders does absolutely nothing to that denominator.”
You’re comparing apples to corpses. A handful of activist groups printing stickers and hanging banners is not the same scale or severity as the thousands of unique homicide and robbery offenders produced every year by the Black population. One is low-volume, non-violent fringe noise. The other is a multi-decade body count that wrecks cities. The denominator argument works for rare, low-impact acts. It collapses when the absolute number of offenders is large and the share of total serious violence is 50%+ from 13-14% of the population. You’re deliberately equating stickers with murder to pretend the scale is the same. It’s not.
“Blacks with money just move from poor areas to rich areas like everyone else”
They move away from other Blacks. The preference is visible in residential patterns even after income is controlled. Culture, crime rates, school quality, and social dysfunction travel with the group average. Pretending race and neighborhood conditions are unrelated variables is deliberate blindness.
The BJS “poor White 46.4 vs poor Black 43.4” numbers
Those are nonfatal violent victimization rates. For homicide the gap is massive and remains large after income controls. Poor Whites are still far safer from being murdered than higher-income Blacks. Overall Black rates for the serious stuff (homicide, robbery, gun crime) stay elevated. Poverty does not explain the bulk of the difference; lower average cognitive ability, higher impulsivity, and cultural patterns do.
“Source the claim that every other poor group is less violent”
Appalachian Whites, poor East Asians, and even many Hispanic groups show lower violent crime rates than American Blacks at similar income levels. Internationally, sub-Saharan African and Caribbean homicide rates are elevated relative to other poor regions once you account for age structure and reporting. The pattern is not “poverty.” It tracks group averages in IQ, time preference, and impulse control across countries and centuries.
“Net negative in every category is just opinion”
Crime costs, welfare usage relative to tax contribution, lower average productivity from the IQ distribution, affirmative action deadweight, and the social trust destruction in mixed areas are measurable. The group average is a net fiscal and social negative in the United States. That is not a vibe; it is the ledger.
You’re doing the standard progressive two-step: concede the disparity exists, then insist no one is allowed to notice the pattern or treat the group average as information. The data does not care about your feelings.
Higher Black crime rates, lower average cognitive performance at the tails, and the resulting social outcomes are real, persistent, and large. Everything else is cope.
You said the chart “doesn’t prove rich Blacks commit more crime than poor Whites” and “doesn’t even establish the income of the offender.” Then you pointed out that rates drop with income for every group like that somehow saves you.
It doesn’t. Look at the numbers you yourself quoted: high-income Blacks ($85k+) sit at 15.4 per 100k while poor Whites (<$10k) are at 7.2 and high-income Whites are at 1.9. That’s still multiple times higher for the “rich” Blacks.
The gap stays wide across every income bracket. SES lowers the rate inside every group, but it does not erase the racial difference.
Most of these tables track the victim’s household income, and since the vast majority of Black homicide is intra-racial, the offender pattern tracks the same way. High-income Black areas still produce far more bodies than low-income White ones. Your “muh socioeconomics” line fails the most basic control.
You said “0 Black players in FIDE top 100 doesn’t measure IQ or genetics, you need participation rates, training, geography…”
No. Chess is one of the purest high-g activities that exists. The complete absence of Blacks from the absolute elite (and the near-total historical absence among grandmasters) is exactly what a group mean IQ around 85 with a normal standard deviation predicts. The right tail thins out hard. East Asians and Europeans dominate the top. “Participation” does not magically produce zero representation at the extreme for decades.
This is the same pattern you see in physics, math olympiads, patents, and every other high-threshold cognitive domain. Pretending it’s just “access” is the same cope people use every time a group difference refuses to disappear.
Only 0.204% of Blacks commit robbery / 0.010% homicide so the other 99%+ aren’t criminals”
This is the most autistic version of “not all.”
Yes, the absolute percentage of any large population that commits murder in a given year is small. That is true for every group. The relative rate is what matters for risk. Blacks are ~13-14% of the population and routinely 50%+ of homicide offenders.
That means the average Black person is several times more likely to be a murderer or robber than the average White person. Rational people respond to base rates.
You don’t need every individual to be a criminal for the group difference to be decisive for where you live, who you hire, or who you trust around your kids. The “tiny subset” still produces the majority of the corpses and the majority of the urban chaos.
The livestock / White bestiality-CSAM analogy is retarded and you know it. Bestiality and federal CSAM cases are tiny, niche offenses. Black overrepresentation in homicide, robbery, and aggravated assault is a multi-decade, multi-source national pattern that produces thousands of dead bodies and destroyed neighborhoods every year.
One is a rounding error. The other is why entire cities look the way they do. If Whites dominated street murder the same way, every institution would treat it as an emergency. They don’t, because the pattern runs the other direction.
“Just don’t live in a high-crime neighborhood / neighborhood ≠ race”
Black neighborhoods are high-crime because of the people in them. When you control for SES, higher Black population share still predicts higher gun homicide. Crime follows the people. White flight is not mysterious prejudice; it is pattern recognition. The first thing successful Blacks do is leave majority-Black areas for safer ones. That is not a coincidence.
“Racism is natural proves nothing”
Tribalism, in-group preference, and sensitivity to group differences in violence and cooperation are evolved. Ignoring them does not make you moral; it makes you a sucker who ends up with higher victimization rates and lower social trust. Societies that pretend group differences don’t exist get the outcomes those differences predict.
1. There is not a single serious white nationalist or “racist” person that says that all blacks are murderers or violent criminals.
The vast majority of all people do not steal rape, murder etc. The large majority of soldiers that are deployed in war zones never take a bullet or sustain combat wounds. That does not mean that war zones or black communities are safe, you fucking retard.
It’s about statistical probability. Racism is completely natural and evolutionary. No serious person would ever want to raise their children in areas that they are 7-8X more likely to be murdered and 3.5X more likely to be kidnapped, even though most people will never be killed or raped you still wouldn’t logically take that risk.
The first thing that blacks do when they get some money is move away from other blacks and into a white neighborhood without gang violence just like every leader of BLM did.
It’s also about how a small fraction of the total population is committing most of the problems. If you were a farmer, and 13% of your livestock were causing 50-60% of the total problems on the farm, they would separate or cull those livestock immediately. It’s basic proportionality, one group is causing significantly more of the total problems than the other.
On top of that, even if blacks didn’t commit the majority of crimes there are still significant cultural, economic and political factors that should be taken into consideration when discussing their overall impact. They are a net negative to everyone else in every single fucking category.
2. Lmfao, the richest blacks commit more crime than the poorest whites. A white trash trailer park is significantly safer than any black neighborhood. There are third world slums in India with shit smeared on the streets that are safer and more advanced than blacks living in the richest country on earth.
“Muh socioeconomics” that you retards try to use to excuse their shitty ghetto ass culture is hilarious. Every single other group of poor people on earth is nowhere near as violent, illiterate and retarded as blacks are.
They are also constantly voting against their own economic interests by fighting to allow millions of third world Hispanics into this country to take their low skill job opportunities and limited affordable housing.
3. Black crime is likely even worse than what is being reported. Look at all of these back to back videos I can show you of mass rioting and looting, nearly none of them are charged and prosecuted. They’ve defunded and reduced police in most of their cities, meaning there is less chance to catch and prosecute criminals now in general. About 50% of total murders and other violent crimes go unsolved.
4. White supremacist propaganda incidents (stickers, banners, flyers) are fringe, low-volume, and overwhelmingly non-violent. A handful of groups generating most of the documented incidents does not produce thousands of corpses every year.
Black overrepresentation in homicide, robbery, and aggravated assault is not “anecdotes.” It is national, multi-decade, multi-source statistical reality (FBI, BJS NCVS, CDC). The same pattern appears in victim reports, arrest data, and clearance data. It is not produced by three activist organizations printing flyers.
Concentrated behavioral differences at the population level are not the same thing as a small activist network generating noise. One produces body counts and destroyed cities. The other produces ADL press releases.
The only people you’re appealing to by writing this stupid shit is brain dead niggers, if you thought Trump is extreme you’ve literally seen nothing yet lmfao. This next generation is becoming extremely radicalized, I’ve never seen so many people openly support national socialism before. What used to be a taboo ideology is becoming mainstream. Keep pushing us though, I see violence on the horizon.
@user70742413271@FINAL3600p@nanasehirokawa You retards have accomplished literally nothing for the entire time you’ve existed on this planet. There are slums in India with shit smeared on the streets that out perform blacks living in first world countries lmfao.