The only language some “teens” understand is brutality. Until we start speaking that language fluently and explaining to them very very clearly that these actions will not be tolerated, then we frankly deserve to keep living like this. Don’t we?
@Liberty_Xtreme 🙌🏼 I just told someone today the kids of Gen X raised their kids to beat your bully brats ass! My 12 yo granddaughter won’t start anything, but she’ll end it! She’s petite, but does gymnastics, and she’ll go full metal jacket on ya if you pick on someone around her 😂
Fairfax pays FLOCK GROUP INC $1,500/month for what? Mass surveillance is unconstitutional. We need to #DeFlock Fairfax & the rest of Virginia. We also need to replace the socialist supervisors & elected stooges who allowed it to happen.
https://t.co/WqoEJ6NXMm
The Nuremberg Code is a set of 10 ethical principles for permissible medical experiments on human subjects. It emerged from the 1947 verdict in the "Doctors' Trial" (part of the Nuremberg Trials) following Nazi human experiments during World War
Here is a bullet-point summary of its 10 core principles (paraphrased for clarity from primary sources, with key details):
Voluntary Consent: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This requires legal capacity, free choice without force, fraud, deceit, or coercion, and sufficient knowledge of the experiment's nature, duration, purpose, methods, hazards, and potential effects. The responsibility for ensuring quality consent lies personally with the researcher and cannot be delegated.
Societal Benefit: The experiment should yield fruitful results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods and must not be random or unnecessary in nature
Scientific Basis: The experiment should be designed and based on animal experimentation and knowledge of the disease or problem, such that the anticipated results justify performing it on humans
Avoid Unnecessary Suffering: The experiment should be conducted to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No Expectation of Death or Disability: No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe death or disabling injury will occur, except perhaps where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects
Risk vs. Humanitarian Importance: The degree of risk should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved
Preparations and Facilities: Proper preparations and adequate facilities must be provided to protect subjects against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death
Qualified Personnel: The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons, with the highest degree of skill and care required at every stage
Right to Withdraw: During the experiment, the human subject must be at liberty to bring it to an end if they have reached a physical or mental state where continuation seems impossible
Termination if Harmful: The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if they have probable cause to believe continuation is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the subject
These principles form a foundational document in medical ethics and informed consent, influencing later codes like the Declaration of Helsinki. For the full original text, reliable sources include the Avalon Project at Yale Law School.
@sentarahealth DAILY REMINDER, DRS LIKE THIS ONE, MURDERED YOUR LOVED ONES WITH REMDESIVIR! MEDICARE PAID EVERY FACILITY 50,000.00 PER DOSE! THEY KNEW THIS DRUG WOULD SHUT DOWN THE PATIENTS VITAL ORGANS, THE ELDERLY DID NOT STAND A CHANCE! #C19KARMA
RIP one more Flock Camera in Chambersburg PA.
Police are asking for any and all leads. So if anyone seen anything about who did this… no you fuckin’ didn’t.
Snitches get found in ditches. This is America, don’t be a commie.