NCAA March Madness statistical analysis in a bubble. Data for rankings derived only from previous March Madness tournaments. Inquiries: [email protected]
Bet 1 ✅… barely, but not really. I had these teams as super close in my rating points (561 vs 554) so alternate line for south carolina state, because it gave better odds at +3.5 of -165, seemed like a safe bet.
@Stultz5Stultz Kentucky got the win away. These metrics are based off neutral court games in the tournament. A win is a win on the road especially in the hostile SEC.
Texas A&M being weak was something that could’ve been seen. I had them as my 38/51 teams projected to be in the field. Vanderbilt as 47/51. Come March it isn’t necessarily about how good a team is, but about how weak the teams they are playing are.
Vanderbilt winning at the moment, Auburn dominating, and Michigan State winning a close one comes at no surprise. Texas A&M is very weak for how high they are projected.
@JohnBishop71 The Big East compared to last year is far weaker. Creighton and UConn for example are not nearly as good metric or eye test wise. St. John’s is a good team, but multiple big ten teams look to be the same strength.
(4) Houston -2.5 vs (10) Texas Tech [≈+150 rating points] and (14) Michigan -1.5 vs (50) Nebraska [≈+500 rating points] were both easy picks based off the 51 team field put together today. While both may have struggled a bit due to playing away. Rankings held strong.
Last year’s top 20 March Madness tournament strength teams. (out of order numbers is due to updated statistical weighting for this years rating system)