Natalie where was your outrage when your two thug brothers and their thug mate threatened to smash my face in and beat up my sons whilst I was having lunch in a pub in Ashfield? My female staff were terrified. Where was your outrage when I had to put my office into lock down when one of your thug brothers kept ringing my office and threatening to come round and sort me out? Please don't claim you know nothing about this, two of them pleaded guilty in court. Are you going to call this out?
Labour MPs lined up to pay tribute to Jo Cox.
Parliament used the death of David Amess to pass the Online Safety Bill instead of mentioning radical Islam.
However, Nigel Farage paying tribute to Ann Widdecombe is “hijacking it for propaganda”?
Not having it at all.
Peter, this is complete misinformation. I've never refused a DBS check. I actually have an enhanced DBS check for work and sports coaching.
I have already provided Wigan Council with a copy of my DBS certificate. Check your facts before spreading lies.
Let’s nail this state lie once and for all. The government is NOT increasing defence spending by £270 billion during this parliament. It is a ludicrous claim.
Yet one Keir Starmer made to Parliament’s Liaison Committee in March: Labour, he said, will “spend £270 billion MORE (my emphasis) than we would otherwise have done on defence” in this Parliament.
Starmer has always been weak on facts and figures but even by his standards this is a massive porkie.
This is the truth: £270 billion is the total cumulative projected defence spending for the four financial years from 2025/26 up to and including 2028/29 lumped together.
It is NOT even the cumulative increase in defence spending during these years.
Nobody (except perhaps Gordon Brown) speaks about public spending in this way, unless the intention is massively to mislead.
By 28/29 defence spending is projected to be £13 billion a year more than at the start of the period. So not exactly £270 billion. But I guess if you’re going to lie you might as well make it a whopper.
I’ve looked at Zack Polanski’s family history.
His gt grandparents were Samuel & Hilda POLINSKY who arrived here from Russia.
Barnett ‘Benny’ Polinsky was Zack’s grandfather, who changed his name to Paulden.
I have questions. 1/3
Terrible News.
@reformparty_uk are fixing potholes by using one of our greatest ever British manufacturers machines.
British councils buying British machines to fix British roads employing British people in Britain.
Truly shocking.
You’re the energy secretary. Yet you don’t seem to know that BP’s ‘excess profits’ come from its global oil trading division, which is not subject to UK ‘excess profits’ windfall tax, not from its North Sea activities, which are. Remarkable.
Keir Starmer’s history is catching up with him - and his cronyism has brought him to the brink.
I’ve written to the PM about his relationship with the disgraced Phil Shiner and Lord Hermer.
Shiner went after British soldiers and was struck off the roll of solicitors for his conduct.
Both Shiner and Hermer worked on the Al-Sweady case after it was clear the allegations were likely baseless.
Starmer himself worked with Shiner and with Hermer in the Al-Jedda and Al-Skeini cases.
Starmer says he disowned Shiner. But he refuses to condemn Hermer - and put him in the Cabinet.
What’s good for Shiner should be good for Hermer. Starmer should sack him - and apologise for bringing him into government.
The Scottish government is responsible for this sexual assault. The Supreme Court has confirmed women’s right to single sex spaces, a ruling the SNP continues to flout. If the victim wishes to sue, https://t.co/iyohnrgVZN can assist with all costs.
Truly desperate stuff 🤦♀️
-I was asking you about the PM, not Tice
-Tice tax claims are the subject of legal action
-I asked Jenrick about Tice anyway
-Anyone who has ever seen me interview Tice knows I’m far from a snowflake
-The definition of a snowflake is a serving MP who posts this sort of hatstand and then switches off replies.
When I was in No10, somebody failed developed vetting before their proposed appointment to a sensitive post.
We were told immediately, and were advised - correctly - that this person could not be appointed.
Who gave that advice? Sue Gray - later Starmer’s chief of staff.
Just pointing out that I broke the story 7 months ago that Mandelson failed vetting from the security services and put it to Downing Street...so the idea that Downing Street only found out on Tuesday is complete nonsense.
https://t.co/9Zp14BGCoD
@RossKempsell And this from Ollie Robbins: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee meeting in the UK Parliament, which took place on January 14, 2025.
Labour now spinning that Iran will lead them to miss their housebuilding target (1.5 million).
Hilarious spin from a government that has increased costs for housebuilders and was far behind on the target already. #labour#dotheythinkwearethick