zeal

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@BiggieBagg0 @Neftali80four @DaClipperHQ “Charlie was helping the black community”

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Why exactly would you expect a lolicon to self report themselves wanting to rape children when they consume media depicting pornography of children? In what world does that make the concrete basis to base an argument off of? Just because you said it doesn’t make it true.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@SunDevil033 @levirelates Looked into it, you are correct. I concede on that point.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Again, your 99.999% claim is your baseless assertion you don't know these people.

And again, as I've stated numerous times, I never called them real children. I said they have attributes *depicting* the anatomical structure and likeness of a child.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli A "Yes" or "No" doesn't capture the nuance of the discussion, and you know that.

And the idea that prolonged attraction to pre pubescent features would never contribute to one's sexual attraction, therefore impulsivity towards children is unfounded?

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli You never did

Japan's age of consent only recently changed from 13, 3 years ago. Including it's equally atrocious lack of reporting record and you have an undocumented variable. Japan isn't the idealized example you think it is.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli You're taking a version of me that doesn't exist and using it to make a definitive claim. Truth is you can't prove that none of the people you consume this content with have 0 proclivity to assault children.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Would its consistent consumption make me more at risk than the average person who does not?

I believe so, yes.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli someone then you are more at risk than the average person sure.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Your question overlooks the difference between gun violence and sexual deviancy. There is no inherent fantasy in your metaphor; it lacks incentive. Gun violence is multi-purpose, not only malicious. Now, if the depiction is based on you indulging in the fantasy of shooting-

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty is not a normal or justifiable act*

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty And that wasn't the argument; you can enjoy whatever you want. But that doesn't change the idea that the content consumption for self-pleasure is a normal or justifiable act.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli You and I both know characters that are canonical children are also put under the category of Loli, not just characters with anatomical similarity.

And this is why I stated a "depiction of sexual misconduct". It is not real; the concept that's being put on display is.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli I would not make the statement that because you indulge in loli content, it means that you are a pedophile. However, unlike most forms of potentially hazardous content, there is no moral flexibility. It is created and consumed exclusively to derive pleasure from what is immoral.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@acruelkitty @Sirikamiloli Never stated as such

Widespread consumption of "reducing" sexual violence is not a scientific consensus.

And I concede on using "VCSAM", what I meant to convey was that Loli is a fictional depiction of sexual misconduct enacted against a minor.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@SunDevil033 @levirelates Trumps statement fails as proof. 10 states have 0 tolerance rape victim or no, of which he doesn’t change. His word is a suggestion not mandation. The 10 0 tolerance states are again, Republican majority states.

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@AezzieUwU I’m that guy no one asked

It’s a strawman, no trans rights activist worth their salt makes that argument

[zeal @LittleScaredy]

@SunDevil033 @levirelates Abortion abolition is a Republican majority policy.