@DrRosena I would refuse to be treated by a doctor who has so little regard for the rights of women and girls - and such a woeful ignorance of safeguarding. Shame on you.
@HeidiBachram@novaexhibition I went on Tuesday with my eldest daughter, a student who knew next to nothing about the events of October 7th. We returned to watch a panel discussion later. Both of us left profoundly moved by the experience. Not Jewish, but would agree that we were probably the exception.
The world watched the aftermath of October 7 with its own eyes. Survivors, first responders, forensic experts, journalists, and independent investigations documented horrific acts of sexual violence committed by Hamas terrorists.
To hide behind technicalities such as "no independent investigation has conclusively verified every individual rape allegation" while simultaneously acknowledging evidence of widespread sexual violence is not a pursuit of truth—it is an exercise in moral evasion.
No one demanded this level of impossible evidentiary perfection for victims of other atrocities. When hundreds were murdered, mutilated, kidnapped, and subjected to sexual violence, the burden should not fall on traumatized victims and devastated families to satisfy political narratives.
The real tragedy is that instead of standing unequivocally with victims, some international actors appear more concerned with creating doubt than with seeking justice.
History will remember October 7 for what it was: one of the most brutal terrorist massacres of the modern era. Attempts to minimize, relativize, or obscure the crimes committed that day do not serve human rights—they undermine them.
@UNSRVAW Have you even considered the reason that no survivors of the October 7th atrocities have contacted you is because there were virtually NONE? There is anguished and sickening testimony from survivors who witnessed/heard brutal rapes and murders and rescuers who found the bodies.
Horrified by this. I heard @UNSRVAW at Filia women’s rights conference and recall being impressed, but her face of utter contempt while listening to this woman’s testimony disgusts and disturbs me. I also attended the @novaexhibition today, and urge everyone to do so.
Watch closely new video showing the U.N. reaction: as courageous former hostage Ilana Gritzewsky confronts October 7th denier Reem al-Salem—by recounting the horrific abuse she suffered from Hamas—the U.N. rapporteur on violence against women sits there stone-faced. No empathy.
Watch closely new video showing the U.N. reaction: as courageous former hostage Ilana Gritzewsky confronts October 7th denier Reem al-Salem—by recounting the horrific abuse she suffered from Hamas—the U.N. rapporteur on violence against women sits there stone-faced. No empathy.
1/ I went to Parliament to watch the Women and Equalities Committee. The chair of the EHRC Mary-Ann Stephenson (MAS) and CEO John Kirkpatrick were giving evidence, the other adults in the room were Rosie Duffield and Rebecca Paul MP. Other than that it was the slow kid's table.
@jk_rowling Arrived for lunch at a pub as one of these matches started, on TV above a table with a group of people. I informed them they were about to witness the disgraceful sight of a man beating up a woman while they ate. Everyone looked stunned. My brother and SIL were mortified.🙄
@SVPhillimore@SEENPublishing Many questions need to be answered by the Nottingham service. Refused to cooperate with Cass & missing 2,000
Yet Glidden is national lead in NHS?
Bouman past president of WPATH
Bouman named in emails re interference in Johns Hopkins systematic reviews
https://t.co/mqiuUTTSRZ
@Wommando@LouiseWluddite ….women are more likely than men to experience feelings of fear, distress and humiliation by in effect, being required to change their clothes in front of a member 🍆 <BIG PAUSE> of the opposite sex…
Like how that was presented there.
@AnnDuffieldnews Oh come on. I’m late Gen X and I knew all about these changes way back when they were made - despite the fact my retirement age is 68! I can’t believe people weren’t aware of it. Sorry, but I think there are other priorities.
Puberty Blockers and (Gender) Distress Relief
Even if we assume the strongest possible claim made by proponents of gender affirmative care, that puberty blockers reduce gender related distress in some children, this does not justify their use, nor does it validate the concept of an innate, mismatched gender identity.
Short term distress relief is fully explained by well established child development mechanisms:
- Stress removal: Puberty is intrinsically stressful. Blocking it predictably reduces anxiety without addressing underlying causes.
- Cognitive concreteness (Piaget): Children experience relief from a tangible action (“my body is stopped”), regardless of whether the belief motivating it is accurate.
- Social reinforcement (Bandura): Affirmation, praise, peer belonging, and adult approval reliably reduce distress.
- Meaning and scaffolding (Vygotsky): Distress decreases when uncertainty is replaced by a culturally sanctioned explanatory narrative endorsed by authority figures.
- Avoidance (Winnicott): Suppressing bodily development reduces immediate discomfort but risks entrenching a False Self organised around avoidance rather than integration.
Crucially, symptom relief is not the same as benefit. Puberty blockers carry substantial developmental costs even in best-case scenarios:
- They interrupt normal psychosexual development (Erikson).
- They foreclose exploration and promote identity foreclosure (Marcia).
- They bypass natural desistance pathways (60 - 90% without intervention).
- They require decisions beyond a child’s cognitive capacity for informed consent.
- They place children on a predictable pathway to further medicalisation.
In paediatric medicine, an intervention must not only reduce distress but also preserve development, protect future autonomy, and avoid irreversible harm. Puberty blockers fail these criteria.
Feeling better does not mean something true has been discovered. Children can experience genuine relief from interventions that reinforce avoidance, provide meaning, or reduce stress, without those interventions being developmentally appropriate, ethical, or necessary.
The ethical response to childhood gender distress is not to halt development, but to support it.
@PoliticsJOE_UK I despair when senior government minister @lisanandy doesn’t understand that the Supreme Court actually clarified existing law and did NOT “set a new standard.”
I will do everything I can, working cross-party, to stop this immoral experiment going ahead.
Please retweet this and spread the word.
It can be stopped. It must be stopped.