@sxycpln0w@STAUGPD@DOJCrimDiv@DOJNatSec@CivilRights@DonaldTrump Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006) (warrantless search of a defendant’s residence based on his estranged wife’s consent was unreasonable and invalid as applied to a physically present defendant who expressly refused to permit entry)
@sxycpln0w@STAUGPD@DOJCrimDiv@DOJNatSec@CivilRights@DonaldTrump Either way — a police car just drove past where I am about to smoke a cig on the curb and for gods sake. Frank, even if I behaved “badly” they still had no right to then forcefully enter *your* room
@sxycpln0w@STAUGPD@DOJCrimDiv@DOJNatSec@CivilRights@DonaldTrump The rest of the week, after, for unknown reasons, i had been deemed well enough recovered to be moved back to the female-only block (receiving my clothes only hours beforehand, and to my amazement, abnormally so
@sxycpln0w@STAUGPD@DOJCrimDiv@DOJNatSec@CivilRights@DonaldTrump I did NOT smash my nose to look abused. I smashed my nose because i had hoped that st. Johns jail would let me make my first phone call — instead, literally hours later, they manhandled me when I wasn’t even kind of fighting back or at all, dragged me to the other end of the jail
Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006) (warrantless search of a defendant’s residence based on his estranged wife’s consent was unreasonable and invalid as applied to a physically present defendant who expressly refused to permit entry).