@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass michael...you are not correct. AGAIN, the PDO is decadal, not annual in nature. You need to look at the overall envelope, not the annual values. Want proof that I am correct? We did not have a record high water level for the 15/16 el nino....cliff
@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass Michael. you are making an error. For the PDO is the long-term variability that counts (search on this, you will see I am right). The fact that a short period went positive is not important...the 20 years around it were cold. PLEASE CALL ME and I will explain the dynamics..cliff
@SeattleWXGuy Michael.... you are wrong about this for many reasons. For example, the PDO state today is different from 97/98 and that makes a HUGE difference. Anyway, I wish you would not call names and do what scientists do, respectfully try to understand different viewpoints..cliff
@SeattleWXGuy Michael....you are not correct. I was talking about THIS EVENT...and I showed the proof. You need to be more careful before going negative like this. PLEASE..cliff
@SeattleWXGuy@KooyVander@CliffMass You are not correct about this. The contribution of snowmelt was less than 20%. I wrote a published paper on this event and know it well. There are other papers that agree with my conclusions. The data is clear... snowpack was a minor contributor to the westside flooding.
@SeattleWXGuy@KooyVander@CliffMass you are not correct about this. The contribution of snowmelt was less than 20%. I wrote a published paper on this event and know it well. There are other papers that agree with my conclusions. The data is clear... snowpack was a minor contributor to the westside flooding.
@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass You are uninformed and wrong. I have confirmed what I stated with two leading local hydrologists. I have read the literature. Have you done either? You are not a meteorologist nor a hydrologist. If you even bothered to ask Google AI you would not have made this mistake
@SeattleWXGuy LocalClimateWeatherPerson
@LocalClim
michael...there are essential, serious flaws in your analysis. Check my blogs on this topic, and perhaps you will realize the mistakes...cliff
@SeattleWXGuy michael...there are essential, serious flaws in your analysis. Check my blogs on this topic, and perhaps you will realize the mistakes...cliff
@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass michael...you are totally wrong. Go to the NW fire center website and LOOK AT THE MOISTURE LEVELS WHEN THE FIRES STARTED. You will see I am correct..cliff
@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass michael....that is simply wrong. There is a lot of evidence that the seatac temps are too high. I have blogged about it several times, showing the evidence based on many events. Others have done the same thing..such as past state climatologist Mark Albright. ..cliff
@SeattleWXGuy@CliffMass Michael.... you are not correct. As a flight dispatcher, you should know that SeaTac runway site has a warm bias and that nearby locations were cooler. Not a bad forecast at all....cliff
@StewarrMark@CliffMass You are totally wrong. My point is that lightning strikes were sparse on the eastern slopes...proof below. BTW...can you stop the name calling? Bad look..cliff