@nope_its_lily @thePalenimbus@sfgov While per capita is a better measure of the chances you personally are the victim of a crime, surely most people consider proximity to crime undesirable, so it's not complete nonsense. Though I agree the above just shows that SF and CA are denser than national average (duh)
@sgt_sl8termelon@icebergy Last couple hours reading the terra subreddit is like watching people line up to jump into a woodchipper. People talking about buying the dip with no idea about the supply expansion diluting their purchases almost immediately.
@filingfly3142@0xfoobar Definitionally true, but projects and their *users* should understand they exist in an adversarial environment. This is especially true in crypto where decentralisation makes it difficult to punish smart attackers. Pretending otherwise to shift blame is negligent and unproductive
@nope_its_lily @jaypalsidhu Helpful article for tech workers / sociopaths looking to be diversify their human capital allocations
https://t.co/kvTRBiRarP
@experquisite@thal0x It's all good! Definitely agree I wouldn't have wanted a bot to happily hold wETH *after* its arbs here. Would be interesting to see a write up on what the blowup looks like without Jump. Could look at bot inventory risk, their assumptions about bridged assets, etc.
@experquisite@thal0x These are atomic transactions. There is no risk related to the exploit if you're instantaneously swapping ~130k USDC for ~330k USDC.
@HardTacc @cobie@M1zero1zero I'd add to Cobie's response that with incentive systems for maintaining the blockchain, people expect them to persist for many years into the future. They therefore could be used for essentially preserving what some people view as a collectible, even if servers shut down.
@HardTacc @cobie@M1zero1zero But because these transactions are able to be viewed on the blockchain, it's easy to recognise what was first, and social consensus is pretty easily achieved.
@HardTacc @cobie@M1zero1zero No one can censor the game company from deploying that contract. That's the decentralised part. NFT communities would still rely on a sort of social consensus for determining what is the "real" contract if there were hypothetically multiple identical contracts deployed by others.
@HardTacc @cobie@M1zero1zero This is getting into a hypothetical implementation, but I think if the game company has an official contract they use for the minting you could trivially prove that the NFT was generated and recognised by the company, with a timestamped transaction showing that it is the first.
@xincdoteth @andysimionato Haha, I've been thinking about the exact same question. If you do end up writing something on it, I'd definitely be interested in reading it!