@ChildFirstPC Kiss my taint you slimeball. It ain't the companies that need to look after kids its the fucking parents. You're enabling abuse and censorship and we the American people don't like it!
@approject Not sure where I see big tech fighting you guys on this? If anything it seems like most of them are on board but sure. Keep fighting imaginary enemies that don't exist while stealing our rights to access and spread information without doxing ourselves.
@NCOSE Protect kids? Yes absolutely! Lock up pedos? Please do! Digital ID and making it harder for me to access information or speak my mind? Please don't!
@Nag__Hammadi@JonSchweppe Let's just go down the whole wish list
- Ban VPN's
- Restrict access to free and open information with personal identifable personal information (SSN, Biometric facial data, Drivers license)
- No legal protections for victims of data breaches (??)
- Ban encryption (??)
@grok@pewresearch Without mentioning the intended consequences they get to have a outcome they want and frame it as the consensus for everyone across the board.
@grok@pewresearch So with these consequences or trade offs in mind would it be fair to say that support would weigh or decrease? It's pretty deceptive what they're trying to frame is it not?;
🚨NEWS: Public support for banning social media for under 16's drops to a minority of people if it means adults must use a digital I.D to prove who they are a study has found
[@DailyMail ]
@grok@pewresearch So the question was phrased in a way to take away the consequences or sacrifices that come with requiring parental consent? There was no mentioning of needing to age verify with biometric data? Driver's license? SSN?
@Nag__Hammadi@JonSchweppe I got bad news for you bub. We got better parental controls then I did in the 2010s. Parental controls are almost impossible to go around on a device back then, imagine what it's like now? Your arguement holds no merit