My theory on how vaccines increase autism risk.
1. Internalization of aluminum adjuvants in antigen presenting cells (APCs)
Aluminum adjuvants are particulate crystalline structures, with a charged surface area, to absorb antigens. APCs phagocytize aluminum adjuvants in vaccines in order to retrieve the antigens bound to it to perform antigen presentation.
https://t.co/btVKp9CutY
"Our results indicate that macrophages internalize AlOOH by constitutive macropinocytosis assisted by the filopodial protrusions that capture the adjuvant particles."
https://t.co/zM3ArJyEBG
"It was concluded that antigen internalization by dendritic cells was enhanced when the antigen remained adsorbed to the aluminum-containing adjuvant following administration"
https://t.co/PZn1xNjTvQ
"These results taken together suggest that the intracellular uptake of ABA by cells of monocytic origin, occurs via phagocytotic mechanisms"
2. Aluminum adjuvants biopersistence in cells
While this hasn't been studied all too much, limited studies show that aluminum adjuvants may biopersist over a long period of time.
https://t.co/IcwNWRjByL
"We conclude that the MMF lesion is secondary to intramuscular injection of aluminium hydroxide-containing vaccines, shows both long-term persistence of aluminium hydroxide and an ongoing local immune reaction, and is detected in patients with systemic symptoms which appeared subsequently to vaccination."
3. Phagocytes Transport Alum Particles to the Brain
This is possible, but only with the right conditions. Whether it be some kind of insult/injury to the brain, or something that causes encephalitis, brain CCL2 can chemoattract monocyte infiltration to the brain. If the infiltrating monocytes were still carrying their aluminum load, aluminum would have a pathway to the brain.
https://t.co/NEho5IfgHN
"We conclude that intracranial inoculation with infectious TMEV rapidly induces the expression of CCL2 in neurons, and this cellular source is necessary for CCR2-dependent infiltration of inflammatory monocytes into the brain during the most acute stage of encephalitis."
https://t.co/ahD8aHCNq4
"The increased capacity of HIV-infected leukocytes to transmigrate in response to CCL2 correlated with their increased expression of CCR2, the chemokine receptor for CCL2. These data suggest that CCL2, but not other chemokines, plays a key role in infiltration of HIV-infected leukocytes into the CNS and the subsequent pathology characteristic of NeuroAIDS."
https://t.co/LVAdddtm6t
"Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection."
https://t.co/o3u595Hrkj
"Interestingly, the presence of occasional aluminium-laden inflammatory cells in the vasculature and the leptomeninges opens the possibility of a separate mode of entry of aluminium into the brain i.e. intracellularly. However, to allow this second scenario to be of significance one would expect some type of intracerebral insult to occur to allow egress of lymphocytes and monocytes from the vasculature [20]. The identification herein of non-neuronal cells including inflammatory cells, glial cells and microglia loaded with aluminium is a standout observation for ASD"
And while some people have criticized the above study for not having a reference point for the amount of aluminum in a neurotypical brain, this was addressed a later study
https://t.co/G0rM8MAsT1
"Detailed statistical analyses showed that aluminium was significantly increased in each of these disease groups compared to control tissues. We have confirmed previous conclusions that the aluminium content of brain tissue in Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis is significantly elevated."
So there you have my theory on how I believe vaccines are implicated. One can argue, which is a perfectly acceptable rebuttal, that no study has looked at this from end to end, therefore, I am connecting too many parts and therefore, it's a reaching conclusion.
It is a fair point, but keep in mind that
- all the components are biologically plausible.
- it explains my theory on why too many vaccines increase the risk (you are essentially "loading the gun" by loading your immune system with aluminum adjuvants at birth, 2, 4, 6, 12, etc vaccines.
- it explains why not everyone who gets vaccinated will have autism (as there is a "trigger" required that would attract the aluminum-loaded cells to the brain, by brain injury/insult or some event that causes encephalitis)
@foldsproteinsII Wow, how behind on the science are you?
It's epigenetic. Don't you hear that people say it's "multi-factorial"?
What, then, is the autism gene if you're born with it and why is there not 100% concordance in monozygotic twins?
You're missing the point, and likely didn't read that thread about provaxxer logic, which lays it out quite well.
Your statement "vaccines can't cause autism" implies vaccines as a whole, when the majority of your evidence typically rests on single vaccine or single ingredient studies.
There is a paucity of evidence that looks at the American schedule against autism. Even the IOM acknowledged that the majority of evidence is based on what I indicated above.
But the lack of evidence doesn't conclude the contrary either, it's not proof that they are associated. The post indicated that based on this, there is very little evidence on both sides.
@foldsproteinsII That's not the point of that post.
It shows how provaxxers come to erroneous conclusions about all vaccines based on science that doesn't even answer that question.
You accuse others of being scientifically illiterate when you can't even understand that you're doing the same
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
I’m sure you all remember Avery Jackson, the “trans girl” who, at 9, was on the cover of National Geographic in January of 2017. Avery was given the gold standard in gender affirming care: he was chemically castrated and sterilized with “blockers” to hold off male puberty.
Now Avery has come out as “nonbinary” and chosen not to pursue transition, meaning that his puberty was blocked for no reason — but that’s not the worst part. He also identifies as asexual, meaning that he doesn’t experience sexual attraction.
This is undoubtedly the result of the medication used to delay male puberty. The president of WPATH, Dr, “Marci” Bowers, has said on camera that so-called puberty blockers, which are used to chemically castrate sex offenders, chemically castrate the young boys who take them as well, leaving them incapable of arousal or orgasm.
For adult sex offenders, the process is reversible. For boys like Avery, the effects are permanent. He will never feel sexual attraction, or any of the experiences that accompany it. He is also completely sterile; he will never father a child, and his own childhood was spent in the national spotlight. The blockers he was given have also stunted his physical and mental development in irreversible ways. We know from the experiences of other “trans” children that he will never sexually mature - neither physically nor emotionally. All of these things were stolen from him, and he has said that transitioning “ruined my life.”
It’s high time that we stop pretending that children can make an informed decision to transition or take blockers, even if their doctors are honest about the risks and consequences — which most are not.
Blockers are not a pause button. They are not reversible. The intellectual deficits they cause will never repair themselves, and neither will the damage done to the child victim’s body, or to their emotional intelligence and maturity. This will, of course, make it easier to push them into transitioning; ie, to sell them hormones and provide surgical alterations.
Parents like Avery’s, who try to monetize their child’s struggles with gender identity, belong in prison, not on television, and so do the doctors and politicians who were complicit in his chemical castration and sterilization.
Disingenuous take from @doritmi
Malaysia has accelerated their MMR injections about 10 years ago.
1st MMR from 12 months to 7 months
2nd MMR from 7 years to 12 months
decreasing the time between both MMR shots from 6 years to 5 months.
https://t.co/P19jNP9Ni5
Health deputy director-general (Public Health) Datuk Dr Lokman Hakim Sulaiman said the Health Ministry would bring forward the first dose of measles–mumps– rubella (MMR) vaccination to 9 months and second dose to 12 months, from the current 12 months and 7 years.
No changes to their vaccine schedule?
They accelerated their timeline of MMR from 12 months and 7 years to 7 months and 12 months, decreasing the time between shots from 6 years to 5 months.
https://t.co/sUVBCw5zeY
https://t.co/P19jNP9Ni5
Health deputy director-general (Public Health) Datuk Dr Lokman Hakim Sulaiman said the Health Ministry would bring forward the first dose of measles–mumps– rubella (MMR) vaccination to 9 months and second dose to 12 months, from the current 12 months and 7 years.
Megyn Kelly slams Fox News, says they were silent about vaccines and children,
“When I was at Fox if you said anything about the vaccine schedule for kids, you’d get a call immediately to stop talking about that.”