@odbashWizard This is going to rekt miners. Has CFB got a plan for that?
We all want $Qubic halving coz the inflation is killing community but no way it goes ahead.
@cryptokendefi Think it’s coz $Qubic is relayed as exceptional and unique. But the chart tells you it is no different to every other coin out there.
The low IQ will sell once the market rises before the next dump.
Our Laser model series is now verified for the @MLB!
Over the past week it has netted +590% for users with all three Laser models activated.
It supports higher stakes and offers stable results with consistent gains every other day.
@TTVAuger has begun live-streaming his results with great success.
Also, the tier system is releasing Friday which will give specific token holders secure priority access.
@crypto_with_seb If i was only in $Qubic i would be pissed as hell. I am sad that it isn’t picking up as i do hold a bag but this is expected with the huge inflation. With #doge mining and halving hoping it can get a move.
This was what i had hoped CFB was going to have with his famous 3P trading bot long time ago, but he admitted it could be even longer before we get anything 🫠
Maybe $Qubic holders who want an #AI that trades successfully on #PredictionMarkets today should consider $Rain 👇
Only 7m mcap and live and profits every week ✅
https://t.co/JfYHTyoKqU
@PumpitFox@Joshkirby710 Curious because Valis has accused CFB and Qubic of things and convincingly and for folk like me, i do worry if there is any truth. So i am glad this is all going to come to a close. Tbh i always wondered why Valis was so obsessed about another project to his own.
@_MRImmaculate@c___f___b@2xnmore Forget a penny, i will be happy if $Qubic hits 500m mcap by 2027 🙂
I think we are in a bear. Qubic has a lot of good things going for it but emissions is huge and no one is buying. Hence likely we hover at these levels until next bullrun. Patience for those who can hold out.
Ok, i get it. I am low IQ. So let me make a prediction that i stand by unlike your predictions.
I bet that by April 2027 a date you have hinted as a big date for #Qubic, we will remain under 500m mcap.
If i am wrong, then i will happily donate 1B $Qubic to a charity of your choice.
Accept ?
A0 CLI v1.10 + Agent Zero v1.16 are live. 🚀
Computer Use is here. Cross-platform for Linux, macOS, and Windows. Beta feature, feedbacks very welcome. Install the A0 CLI.
Speech is now fully modular. Bring your own STT/TTS.
And more 👇
That chart does look awful and no matter what CFB says to try and change perception, reality is more believable.
Do i think $Qubic is a scam? No.
Do i believe it will survive this bear? Yes
Do i trust CFB price predictions? Well, anyone who follows me, knows the answer to that 🙂
@c___f___b once said:
In a bear market, marketing makes no difference. In a bull market, you don’t need marketing.
I rarely agree with CFB’s price predictions, but on this marketing point, I think he is right.
So what is $Qubic current marketing spend?
I have seen people mention around $40k per month, but I cannot verify the exact figure.
If that is wrong, what is the real number?
And does anyone genuinely think the current marketing spend is justified? 👇
CFB raised the issue of 225 in context of this discussion originally but it appears a community member has solved it and it is not what CFB had implied.
All of this due to poor communication imho 👇
$Qubic
$Qubic is having an own goal moment.
The price is tanking again, and this time it is hard to blame only the miners.
@_Qubic_ has had a serious decentralisation question raised publicly.
The claim is that one entity may now control more than 40% of Computor slots.
That matters because @c___f___b himself reportedly said 225 slots is the cutoff, and that if one entity exceeds this, the excess should be replaced.
So this should be simple.
If the claim is wrong, say so clearly. If the claim is right, explain what happens next.
But silence is damaging.
@c___f___b@cryptokendefi It appears a single entity has over 225 slots. This is close to 50% control $Qubic or are we wrong? Please can you explain if action going to be taken or not.
👇
The HUHH...WAXF mega-cluster now connected from at least 48% (323/676) computor slots in Epoch 212
- each has 2 similar transfers (~30m, ~537m)
- 1 master address that will serve as a reward distributor
- two tightly-synchronized bursts
$QUBIC
The market does not really need $Qubic to be perfectly decentralised on day one.
Many serious networks have had centralisation phases.
But we do need clarity.
Right now, @_Qubic_ markets itself around decentralised intelligence. Its own website uses the phrase “True decentralized intelligence.”
So if the Computor layer is visibly clustered, and if voting power can potentially be coordinated, then the marketing claim starts to look ahead of reality @DeFiMomma
That does not mean $Qubic is a scam but it weakens trust.
And this is where CFB’s role becomes important.
He has reportedly stated that 225 slots is the critical cutoff, and that if one entity controls more than that, the excess should be replaced.
That is a serious standard and community is watching to see if that standard is real.
If the clustering claims are wrong, they need to be disproven clearly.
If they are right, people will expect action 👇
⚠️ QUBIC: DECENTRALIZED REVOLUTION OR ARCHITECTED ILLUSION?
I have spent the last few hours deep-diving into the latest network data, and what I found has forced me to question the "freedom" this project promises. We need to talk about the Clusters.
The Evidence (Epoch 210/211):
The Single Entity: Research by @cryptokendefi reveals that 5 clusters, totaling 218 computor slots (~30% of the network), are feeding rewards into a single address: HUHH...WAXF.
The Automation Fingerprint:
These clusters show identical balances and coordinated transfer timings with gaps of less than 4 seconds.
The Voting Bloc: During the vote for Proposal 3 (qRWA), the network sat at 447 "Yes" votes, just 4 votes short of the 451 quorum needed. The clusters split their votes with surgical precision to ensure the proposal failed.
Crossing the Red Line: CFB stated that a single entity controlling more than 225 slots creates a danger of transaction censorship and MUST be replaced. However, by Epoch 211, this entity jumped to at least 273 slots, well beyond the protocols limit.
The Reality Check:
Lets be real: Even if the system is centralized right now, if this technology scales and #Aigarth succeeds, the price will go through the roof. There is massive money to be made here.
But you must distinguish between a good investment and true decentralization. Dont be the one who falls for the "freedom" marketing while ignoring the central hand behind the curtain.
The Choice is Yours:
I have seen the numbers. I am sharing this so you can make a choice based on truth, not just hope.
Is this the birth of a new revolution, or just a more efficient digital cage?
Decide for yourself.
$QUBIC #AGI #Aigarth #Decentralization #CryptoTruth #FinancialFreedom
Capturing a spike that puts $Qubic in top 10 for a few minutes and implying something different reduces your credibility for me.
You have previously provided very helpful info but being honest is much better as now i dont know whether you are giving a spin on things to suit your pov.
I would have said it demonstrates ability to enter top10 and we need ways to staying there and reaching top spot and say how #qubic will do it.