This is exactly the kind of experiment the RWA conversation has been missing.
You are not proposing a ticker, a points program, or another “community token.” You are asking whether a real private company—one that already lives at the intersection of finance research and technology—can put legally defined ownership on-chain without pretending securities law disappeared. That is harder, slower, and more useful than most of what gets labeled “tokenization.” Keep going. The work of valuation, disclosures, KYC, cap-table integrity, and transfer restrictions is the part that actually matters. If $DVLT’s stack can carry even a slice of that pipeline for a small U.S. company, GoGlides becomes a living test case instead of another outside observer.
A fitting name for the enterprise: GlideForge (I took a swag)
It keeps the original identity, signals that ownership is being built rather than invented, and leaves room for the bigger idea you already sketched—users becoming community becoming owners, with the same legal rights they would have in a traditional crowdfunding round, just recorded and transferred with better infrastructure.
The analysts who have spent years writing “tokenization will transform private markets” decks while never touching a cap table, a Reg CF portal, or a single transfer restriction can keep publishing. Someone has to actually try it.
SpaceX just flew its last Falcon 9 Starlink from Florida. Future FL Starlink moves to Starship.
That opens Florida F9 slots for customers.
$ASTS already flies 3 BlueBirds per F9 from the Cape.
Potential extra FL F9 capacity: • 2026: ~6–10 launches = ~18–30 sats • 2027: ~15–25 launches = ~45–75 sats
Not guaranteed to $ASTS, but the old Starlink slots are now available.
SpaceX just flew its last Falcon 9 Starlink from Florida. Future FL Starlink moves to Starship.
That opens Florida F9 slots for customers.
Potential extra FL F9 capacity: • 2026: ~6–10 launches = ~18–30 sats $ASTS • 2027: ~15–25 launches = ~45–75 sats $ASTS
Not guaranteed to $ASTS, but the old Starlink slots are now available.
@realDonaldTrump It should be illegal for members of Congress to lie to the people they represent. Every time a member of Congress speaks from a public platform—on the House or Senate floor, at a press conference, in official remarks, or in any other public capacity—they should be treated as speaking under oath.
They already swore an oath when they entered office: to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. That oath is not ceremonial. It is a binding commitment to the public. If it is a crime for a private citizen to lie to Congress under oath, it should be no less a crime for members of Congress to lie to the country while exercising the power that oath conferred.
The people are not a lesser audience than Congress. Constituents are the source of that power. A representative who can compel truth from others, while remaining free to deceive the public without consequence, has inverted the relationship the Constitution was written to prevent. Public office is a public trust. Speech from that office should carry the same duty of truth that Congress demands of everyone else.
In short: Fauci’s pardon isn’t a global get-out-of-jail-free card.
Fauci’s Biden pardon only covers US federal crimes from 2014–Jan 19, 2025 related to his official roles. It does not protect against foreign charges.
Most modern US extradition treaties would still allow another country to request his extradition for the same acts under their laws (as long as dual criminality is met), because the pardon was preemptive—no US conviction or trial ever happened. A few older treaties that specifically list “pardoned” as a bar could block it.
Who gains if the SAVE Act fails?
John Thune’s biggest donors include real estate, home builders, and construction groups that rely heavily on immigrant labor.
National Association of Realtors is one of his top contributors.
National Association of Home Builders has given him over $100k.
Restaurant and seniors-housing PACs also show up repeatedly.
These industries have pushed for more work visas and pathways for undocumented workers because labor shortages hit them hard.
A stricter proof-of-citizenship voting bill doesn’t directly regulate their businesses—but it sits in the middle of the same immigration debate they care about.
Data from OpenSecrets and FEC filings. No proof of quid pro quo, just the money trail.