Jay.D.Aussie

Living my 50's. Married with grown kids

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

Satan was freed today by a liberal judge.

Remember when killers were executed to protect society from further carnage? Not as vengeance, but to allow the rest of us to live freely without constant fear?

If you were the Fickle Finger of Fate and were allowed to pick his next victim, who would it be?

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@alphafox It's like getting an American to say "Emu"

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@ThexyBeatht_2 In Australia, tomorrow is today. 🤔

[David Marshall 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sausageandeggx]

They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Well said

[Erin Molan @Erin_Molan]

"Because they were white, they didn't fit your victim narrative. I don't care."

These girls were victims.

Full stop.

Every person who failed them MUST PAY A PRICE.

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@nicksortor Rubber bullets from horseback.

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@DarwinAwards_ Hope she got her Rabies shot. 💉

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@amyann787 @frostydeath1776 Sorry to hear you're having this problem. If your son is good at logic, sit him down and explain that his father treated you that way and now he's not part of your family. He might join the dots.

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@Chicago_Daisy You must have a beautiful brain. 🧠

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@NadaAJones Happy Birthday. 🎂 Wishing you all the best on your next trip around the Sun. 🎉

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

On the left: British citizens who were arrested, processed and jailed within weeks over mean tweets.

On the right: Two thugs who savagely attacked officers in an airport with video evidence. No retrial. Still free to walk among us.

There is a sickness on this island.

[Jay.D.Aussie @LordBallzy]

@Fun_Viral_Vids If it's too good to be true........

[Tas @MrCunnyFunt]

#OnlyinAustralia😂😂🇦🇺🦘

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

Goodnight. 💤😴 Sleep tight.

This dude has the wrong job. WOW!

[John Stossel @JohnStossel]

It's the 20th Anniversary of Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth."

NONE of his scary predictions have come true.

Mt. Kilimanjaro still has snow and Glacier National Park still has glaciers.

Here's why we are not doomed:

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“In a free society, people can believe whatever they want. If you want to believe men can be women or you’re a man who wants to call himself a woman, that is your business. What you cannot do in a free society is force anyone else to accept it. What is at stake here is the ability to lawfully acknowledge reality.

If you care so much about “trans rights” you can work out a way to get them without destroying the category of women in law, female spaces, sport, services, the entire reality of lesbianism, and punishing citizens for acknowledging reality. The fact that you haven’t even tried makes it appear that destroying the rights of women is the goal.

Any politician who will look an Australian citizen in the eye and tell them that a man can be a woman is admitting that they will lie about anything and everything because the most obvious lie has already been told.

If no one in this room can acknowledge reality and fix an obvious problem you are either malicious or incompetent. The days of dismissing this issue are over. This is not a culture war. It’s reality.”

- my words, read by Alison Penfold MP, in parliament today.

Contact politicians are tell them to BACK THE BILL - “Sex Discrimination Amendment- sex based rights bill 2026”

[Samantha Carson 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 @misscarsonn]

Say his name: Henry Nowak.

18-year-old University of Southampton student stabbed to death on 3 Dec 2025 in Southampton.

Vickrum Digwa chased him with a 21cm kirpan, stabbing him multiple times.

Henry left a blood trail, saying “I can’t breathe” as he drowned in his blood.

Police handcuffed the bleeding teen after Digwa accused him of racism, instead of treating him first.

Digwa on trial for murder (denies, claims self-defence).

@Keir_Starmer silent. Bend the knee for Henry, not for some lowlife criminal in Minneapolis!

Mainstream barely covering this.

#JusticeForHenry

Release the bodycam!

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A farmer dies in April 2026.

His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847.

The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle.

On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify.

In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable.

The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft.

The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let.

A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up.

The Treasury collects £140,000.

The land never produces British food again.