That is factually incorrect.
White people are among the least likely to race mix and the decline can't be entirely accounted for by the small percentage that have mixed, not even close.
Also, if you think that the rapid decline of White majorities isn't evidence of genocide, then you are just a liar.
It's one thing to be a shrinking share of the global percentage, but another thing entirely to be a shrinking majority in our own countries.
Also, women don't think that they have any obligation to produce the next generation of their own species, because they are all selfish standpoint theorists, even the so-called "conservative" women.
I swear, if we ever get to Mars, the colony won't be lost because of a catastrophic engineering failure, but because women will refuse to bear children even in an environment where below a replacement TFR can't be sustainably offset with immigration from third world shitholes.
I completely agree.
She shifted the goal post from "any creature that has to feed off a host for survival is a parasite" to "a parasite feeds off the host’s body for survival," which still isn't scientifically accurate, as that would still include newly born babies that require breast milk.
Also, her response proves that she didn't even read my full comment, so I am not even going to bother continuing to engage her.
🚨 Welcome to England 🩸🪓🔪
🗞 Pakistani gang members clash out with Nigerian gang members in Manchester with Machetes & knives in broad daylight in the middle of the road.
Its mental illness, drugs (prescribed and illicit) and non-Whites.
In America, 98% of schools that have metal detectors are majority non-White, and a majority mass shootings that occur outside of school zones are committed by Blacks.
Also, Russia is notoriously harsh in criminal sentencing compared to the United States.
It would be more accurate to expand from gun violence to mass casualty events regardless of weapon, and to compare the United States to a country with a more lenient justice system and significant racial diversity, such as England.
You defined parasite as a dependent organism, which is not scientifically accurate, but I conceded to.
By your definition, a child between 0 and 10 years-old is a parasite because it cannot provide for itself.
But let's use a scientific definition of parasite.
1⃣ Phylogenetic Heterospecificity (Different Species Requirement)
• Parasites are strictly defined as organisms that subsist on a host belonging to a completely different species. Parasitism is an interspecific ecological relationship.
• A fetus is the offspring of the parents, belonging to the same species. Biological interactions within the same species are classified as reproduction, gestation, or parental investment, never parasitism.
2⃣ Evolutionary Fitness Disadvantage vs. Continuity
• Parasitism is an adversarial relationship where the parasite exploits the host, reducing the host's evolutionary fitness, survival chances, and reproductive success without any genetic benefit to the host.
• Pregnancy is the primary mechanism of evolutionary fitness and genetic continuity. Carrying a fetus allows the parent to successfully pass on their own genes to the next generation, fulfilling the primary evolutionary purpose of reproductive anatomy.
3⃣ Immunological Disruption vs. Controlled Tolerance
• Parasites invade a host body, tricking or overriding the host’s immune system, which naturally tries to attack and eliminate the foreign invader.
• A fetus signals the maternal body to establish a highly regulated, symbiotic immunological tolerance. The maternal placenta actively manages nutrient transfer and suppresses specific localized immune responses while maintaining the health of both the mother and the developing offspring.
4⃣ Trophic Level and Ecological Classification
• Parasites occupy a specific niche in an ecosystem's food web where they act as consumers feeding on a separate host organism.
• A fetus does not have an independent ecological niche or trophic level. It is a developmental stage of the host species' own life cycle, analogous to a seed inside a plant fruit.
@King___Nicholas@KokoHontas_xo@Jofus_Malone89@Fairyuxfhe By her reasoning, all children from 0 to ~10 are parasites.
And I am so sorry that you were born Black. Maybe you'll be White in the next life, if there is a next life...
What is it with women applying standpoint theory to everything? I swear, it's as if y'all are incapable of reasoning beyond subjective anecdotes.
Your ex-boyfriend isn't relevant. The fact is that a significant portion of currently active RS3 players are in opposition to having their 20+ year-old accounts reduced to a second-tier status.
You accuse people like me of trying to kill RS3 but then turn around and support alienating updates like Reignited. I wouldn't be surprised if you supported the annual faggot parades, which also caused a lot of division.
@royal_love04@1984orSomething Being present isn't the same as actively participating.
To meet the required elements of New York's rape statute, you need to prove that those additional 5 men were active participants despite being rejected.
@royal_love04@1984orSomething Under New York law, rape is defined as nonconsensual vaginal, oral, or anal sexual contact.
Prove that any of the 7 men present raped that Cornell whore.
Nobody said that it did, you fucking idiot.
However, tempting someone by dressing provocatively and being flirtatious changes the dynamic from innocent victim to malicious provocateur.
Besides, that Cornell whore gave consent, but because most women are neurotic retards who view everything through a mixture of rapidly fluctuating emotions, many of them are rejecting evidence proving this to be the case.
Dude, most of the people who've responded to me have just insulted me.
They aren't even creative with their insults either, opting to just parrot some variation of "touch grass" or "just stop participating in the thing you've always participated in."
I debate logic, philosophy, and politics for a living, but have never seen so many people commit ad hominin argumentation at the same time before.
@RsZellie@RuneScape 20+ years worth of leveling, questing, and achievement hunting is it not griefing.
Griefing is deliberately annoying, harassing, or ruining another player's online gaming experience just for fun, rather than trying to win the game.
@GentlemanYurii@slimothie@syrachillz@RuneScape Again, just refresh the leaderboards and restrict veteran accounts from participating in them.
Other than leaderboards, you have no argument.