“This is empirically false. First she assumes all sexism towards Blsck.women is misogyny. Benevolent sexism prevents outgroup lethal threats. So this is why you see upward mobility with BW that you do not see with outgroup men. Second, BW do not deal w/misandry or arbitrary set discrimination which means you are not eliminated & marked as alien by dominant group males. Lastly, the feminist argument assumes a separate sex based system applying equally to males and females regardless of race. She offers no evidence of outgroups recognizing Blacks on that basis since we k ow outgroup racial perceptions masculinize targets. Again nice story with little.empirical support.” - A Colleague
It’s incredible the lengths to which people will dumb themselves down just keep pushing identity politics and a priori theories of Black Patriarchy. If you think Black men “change in and out of 2nd place with white women,” despite all evidence to the contrary, you are criminally incompetent.
@DrTJC There was also no discussion of wealth during this entire conversation. White wealth is held in families, not gender, so this idea that ADOS men can have more privilege than white women—who were also slaveholders—is ridiculous. It was hard to watch.
When Black Male Studies scholars such as @eithbeezy, @LordHasan, and @DrTJC aver that feminism and its numerous theoretical acolytes (Black Feminist Thought, intersectionality), views of Black men are rooted in time-resistant 19th-century anti-Black misandrist frameworks. They aren’t being intellectually disingenuous or anti-Black woman. They are providing an example of anti-Black misandrist colonial pedagogy that axiomatically characterizes Black males as congenitally pathological and in need of dramatic course correction. For example, colonial pedagogy's (colonial and native American boarding schools, Black miseducation) core premise was that, in order for indigenous (non-white) "subpersons" to be functional beings in modern civil society, they must learn to be less of themselves, and more like their colonizers (Kill the Indian, Save The Man), i.e., they must be saved from themselves. This pedagogical approach is self-abnegating, cultural chauvinistic, essentialist, and paternalistic in nature. Nevertheless, this colonial philosophy of social development is present in feminist, Black Feminist Thought, nominal feminism, and intersectional (bell hooks, Mikki Kendall, Hortense Spillers, The Combahee River Collective) views of Black male development and socialization, which opines that Black males should be less of themselves and more like women in order to be functional beings in society. Thus, one can argue that the substratum of feminist views of Black males is one of subpersonhood, i.e., Black and male is analogous to less than human.
Just these three names alone got me excited. Note how it has nothing to do with "killing your mother dead" BTW 🤔
Just about Faith, fatherhood, and living in a world full of sin🫡
Deion Sanders went live and EXPOSED his ex girlfriend Karrueche after she broke up with him and claimed he couldn't SATISFY her in bed 😬👀
"She got over 200 BODIES of course I couldn't satisfy her, nobody can"
"I was paying her $50k every week anyway it shouldn't even matter"